Fourier-Related-Progression And Inertia

 The stronger the Fourier-Related-Progression of a given arbitrary Noether-Based mass-bearing Hamiltonian Operator is to be, the greater that its resultant inertia will consequently often tend to be. SAM ROACH. 

Steady Tense Of Inertia

 A Noether-Based gauge-invariant Hamiltonian Operator, that works to express a De Rham cohomology, will have the general tendency of working to exhibit the display, of a steady tense of inertia. SAM.

Scalar Amplitude Of Kahler-Based Quotient -- Relative Tense Of Inertia

 In general, for a Noether-Based mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta: The stronger that the scalar amplitude of the Kahler-Based quotient is here to be, the greater that the relative tense of inertia that will tend to be exhibited, by the inferred "team" of mass-bearing discrete energy quanta. SINCERELY, SAM.

Inertia-Related Pulsation -- Fractal/Elastic Modulus

 Let us say, one were to have an inertia-related pulsation, that is here to be tugged, through a given arbitrary Lagrangian-Based path, over a correlative span of time. Such a tense of pulsation, is here to work to involve an eminent coupling, between a tense of metric, in conjunction with a tense of time. The "deeper" that the metric component of such a stated tense of an eminent coupling is to be, the more that the core-field-density of the Lagrangian drive, that is of the permeable wave-tug of such a stated inertia-related pulsation, will often consequently tend to work to bear a heightened tense of a pseudo fractal modulus. Furthermore; The "deeper" that the time component of such a stated tense of an eminent coupling is to be, the more that the core-field-density of the Lagrangian drive, that is of the permeable wave-tug of such a stated inertia-related pulsation, will often consequently tend to work to bear a heightened tense of a pseudo elastic modulus. I WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SUSPENSE LATER! TO BE CONTINUED! SAM.

Isotropically Stable Net Gauged-Action

 The "deeper" of a Kahler-Based quotient, that is here to be exhibited, by a given arbitrary Noether-Based mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, of which is here to work to bear an isotropically stable net gauged-action, as it is here to be homomorphic in its correlative spatial transference, via its kinematic propagation, that is here to be mappable, along its directly associated Lagrangian-Based path, as this is to be taken, over the course of its directly corresponding durational progression of Fourier-Related Transformation, the stronger of a resultant consequential tense of inertia, that may often tend to be displayed, by the exhibition of such a herein stated mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta. TO BE CONTINUED! SINCERELY, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (1989).

Abelian Wave-Tug -- Light-Cone-Gauge Eigenstate -- Inertia

 When a given arbitrary light-cone-gauge eigenstate, is here to work to apply an abelian wave-tug, upon the respective directly associated discrete energy quantum, that it is here to be physically operating upon, this general tense of a gauged-action, will consequently often tend to have the affinity, of working to form an inertial tense of impedance. Inertia is heuristically associated with the general characteristic of mass. Noether-Based mass-bearing discrete energy quanta, tend to always work to bear an abelian light-cone-gauge topology. This is part of the reason, as to why mass tends to have such an affinity, for working to display the general characteristic of "inertia." I will continue with the suspense later! SAM ROACH. (1989).

As To Tense Of Inertia — Just A Thought

 The following is just a “thought,” as to a key difference that I perceive — as to a relationship between the general tendency of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology, And, the general tendency of a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology. The general stratum of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology (Kaluza-Klein), tends to be inclined to propagate (phenomenology) Into a general tense of inertia; whereas, the general stratum of a non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology (Yang-Mills), tends to be inclined to propagate (phenomenology) Out of a general tense of inertia. (1989). To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH.

Quite An Interesting Editorial

When cognition came into a Gliosis-related contact with the core of the "Big-Bang," at the instant of the start of the multiverse, -- time was created, via a direct interaction of ideas with inertia.  Consequently; the interaction of the resultant frequency per earlier stated cognition per (just created) time, worked to form the general condition of the acceleration of those composite phenomenology, which had just existed at the core of that fabric, that had just been drawn outward, in the process of the occurrence of the "Big-Bang."  Since this overall general process worked to form both "time" and "acceleration," those countless components of holonomic substrate, that had just initially existed at the initial core of what "turned-out" to be the "Big-Bang," needed to go into the process, of what was here to be the expansion of each individually taken universal setting. P.S.:  All of the universes of each set of parallel universes, are entangled amongst each other.  To further illustrate; please read some of my earlier writings, as to the concept of Ultimon Flow. Sincerely, Sam Roach.

A Potentially Viable Idea

Here's a little bit of something to think of, in relation to the main influences of physical nature:

(((Discrete Metric-Gauge-Related-Field-Operator)*(Discrete i*PI(del) Action)*(Power (4.135607315*10^(-17) of one Watt))*(Discrete Inertial-Related Pulsation)*(Discrete Idea)*(Discrete Entropy)*(Discrete Charge))/(Discrete Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode))
= 2.062365054*10^(-129)*(6.62607004*10^(-34)Joules*Seconds) (Zero-Point Energy).

((1.110972413*10^(-18)Kg/Coulumbs)*(8.635858*10^(-63)Coulumbs*Seconds)*(4.135607315*10^(-17) of one Watt)*(8.71563*10^(-79)Meters*Seconds)*(7.041797292*10^(-27)Inverse Meters)*(3.364124329*10^(-25)Seconds/Coulumbs)*(1.6022*10^(-19)Coulumbs))/(9.5942*10^(-80)Kilograms*Seconds)).

= 2.062365054*10^(-129)*(6.62607004*10^(-34)Joules*Seconds) (Zero-Point Energy), or, in other words, this is 2.062365054*10^(-129) of the Planck Constant!

I apologize for the mistake about this earlier!!!

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

P.S.:  Yes Doctor Little, this is the blog of one of your patients!

Those General Influences That Worked At Forming Time And Space

Just as the coupling of the influence of thought energy with inertia worked at forming time, at the general instant of the "Big-Bang"; the action of such inertia over time, is what worked at forming the existence of what we call space, -- again, at the general instant of the "Big-Bang." Sam Roach.

An Editorial Thought That Came To My Mind

The following post is just an editorial set of thoughts that's been going on in my head, so I figured that I would "run" it by you.  Again, the following is just an editorial:

Here is an analogy between the 7 Main Influences Of physical nature, and their metaphysical corollaries:

1)  Ideas are analogous to Mind.

2)  Metric-Gauge ("Force-Fields") are analogous to Truth.

3)  The i*PI(del) Action is analogous to Spirit.

4)  The Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode is analogous to Soul.

5)  Charge is analogous to Love.

6)  Inertia is analogous to Principle.

And 7)  Entropy is analogous to Life.

Also,  just as the interaction that is here to exist between the seven Main Influences of physical nature, works to help to allow for the physical condition of homotopy;  The interaction that is here to exist between their seven metaphysical corollaries, works to help to allow for the metaphysical Presence of the Logos.

To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Spurious Perturbation Of Inertia

When there is to be a spurious perturbation in the flow of the fractal of inertia, that any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset is to exhibit, such a said orbifold eigenset will then consequently tend to bear a metric-related Chern-Simons singularity -- at the proximal local region at which there is to be such a said spurious perturbation in the flow of the fractal of its inertia. Samuel David Roach. (1989).

Ideas And Time

Even though time is actually the multiplicit duration of the sequential series of group-related instantons, time is Equivalent to acting as a Yukawa Coupling between ideas and inertia. Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Here's Why The Seven Main Influences Are As These Are

Here's why the seven main influences of physical nature upon reality, are as  these are:

1) Ideas, or, Thought -- Works to allow for any semblance of order or reality.

2)  Force-Fields -- Works to allow for any physical interaction.

3) The i*PI(del) action -- Works to allow for the existence of prolonged physical interaction.

4)  The Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode -- Works to allow for the existence of mass.

5)  Charge -- Works to allow for there to be an attraction between the various masses.

6)   Inertia -- Works to allow for the kinetic motion of attracted mass-bearing phenomenology.

& 7)  Entropy -- Works to allow for enough disorder to occur, so that a re-organization of a multiplicit resultant order may consequently occur.

The Seven Main Influences Of Physical Nature

The general effect of the multiplicit embedding of Chern-Simons Invariants -- that is here to be enacted upon the general phenomenology of physical stratum -- that is here to thence act in a Yukawa manner, upon the seven general forces of nature -- works to help at forming the seven main influences of physical nature upon reality.  These seven main influences that work upon physical nature are:

1) Ideas

2)  Force-Fields

3)  The i*PI(del) action

4)  The Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode

5)  Charge

6)  Inertia

&,

7) Entropy.

Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Ideas And Inertia

Chern-Simons Invariants that are embedded upon the holonomic substrate of thought waves, work to form ideas.  Furthermore -- Chern-Simons Invariants that are embedded upon the holonomic substrate of gravitational waves, work to form inertia.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Light Scattering And Inertia

The scattering of electromagnetic energy, is a Calabi-related interaction.  This is when there is the presence of a gauge-transformation. Whenever light is to scatter -- there is here to be a direct effect, that is taken upon the relative motion of such said light.  Whenever there is a direct effect upon the relative motion of light -- this, even in and of itself, will be a factor in tending  to have an effect on the motion of mass, when  in relationship to such light.  Therefore, -- the scattering of light, works to effect both the presence and the condition of inertia.  Gauge-Transformations, on the whole, work to alter the multiplicit conditions of those equal and opposite effectual gauge-action-related activities, that tend to happen, at a proximal local level. This is part of why such said gauge-transformations, tend to work to effect the multiplicit proximal local conditions of inertia.
Samuel David Roach.

As To The "Shimmying" Of Discrete Energy

At each iteration of group-related instant, superstrings are delineated at their correlative proximal loci.  Due to what I term of as being substringular momentum -- a number of things transpire, in order for such a multiplicit delineation of discrete energy to "handle" this condition of a so-eluded-to inertia.  Part of what happens -- in so as to work to counter such said substrinuglar inertia -- is the topological sway that happens to discrete energy, that I call, "The Imaginary Exchange Of Real Residue."  This exchange, -- involves a to-and-fro general genus of "shimmying" or wobbling, that any given discrete quantum of energy is to undergo, -- over the course of any one given arbitrary iteration of BRST.
Also -- as a discrete quantum of mass-bearing energy is to increase in its relative speed, its Lorentz-Four-Contraction goes up as its correlative Polyakov Action eigenstate is to be decreased.  The just inferred process of the Polyakov Action -- works to help to some degree or another -- in so as to assist in helping for discrete quanta of energy to be both aerodynamic, and, to help such quanta of energy to better endure the process of what I term of as "substringular inertia." Such said "inertia" and such said "momentum" are a fractal of what would actually be considered to be viable inertia and momentum.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Thrust Of Holonomic Substrate Of Klien Bottle

Let us initially consider the holonomic substrate, that is of a given arbitrary Klein Bottle eigenstate, as I have described of as thence being, in the substringular -- as it is here to be Gliosis to a set of discrete quanta of energy, that is to be eminently Yukawa to the Kahler-Metric in a Gliosis-related manner.  As I have said before -- as discrete energy is in the process of moving through the general tense of a Lagrangian, over the course of such a general genus of activity, in so as to go through the process of  Riveting into the norm-to-holomorphic region of such a just mentioned eigenstate of the Klein Bottle (since it is basically impossible for discrete energy to actually "enter" a Klein Bottle eigenstate) -- it is to shake back-and-forth 8 times (a total of 16 general thrusts), in so as to work to help for the so-eluded-to incoming discrete energy, to be able to reattain those fractals of discrete energy that these need -- in order for such said phenomena to both persist and exist as discrete energy.  As you may recall, it is what such an eigenstate of the holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle is to map-out, that is the Klein Bottle, and not this said holonomic substrate -- in and of itself.  This said holonomic substrate, is then to form a ghost-based set of cohomological indices, that come together in so as to appear as then to be in the shape of an actual Klein Bottle.  Remember: -- An object in motion tends to "want" to be kept in motion (inertia).  Each general thrust of the holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle, is here to theoretically "lurch-out," in the process, by 1/16th of a Planck Length -- while in the process.  Yet, due to the general condition of inertia, each actual increment of such an inferred "lurching," is to be directly related to a transversal scalar motion that is to actually tend to cover a distance, that is to be more equivalent to ~.06262929701 of a Planck Length -- it takes an extra .00012929701 or so of a Planck Length's equivalent transversal distance of Ward-Cauchy-related flow, for the said eigenstate of the holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle to stop for just an "instance," once it is pushed-out by .0625 of a Planck Length.  Immediately following, this is then to happen as such, for all 16 of such so-eluded-to back-and-forth thrusts.  (This involves a total of both 8 "back" and a total of 8 "forth" of such motions.)
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Last Test Solution To The First Test Of Course 13

1)  When both inerita and momentum are invariant upon a superstring, this means that over the observable extrapolation in which the said superstring is traced through its trajectorial projection, the pulse of the said superstrings Hamiltonian operation, as well as  the pulse of its Hamilonian operator,  is maintained as these are per eigenmetric in which the said superstring is differentiatin in  kinmatically over time.  For instance, if a given arbitrary superstring works to bear a given arbitrary Hamiltonian operation per a consistently observably transient-based extrapoloation -- along with the Hamiltonian operator of which works to function as having the said Hamiltonian operator that I have here eluded to, then, after every of such discrete set of eluded to instantons in which the said superstring is observably extrapolated, in such a manner in so that the conisdered Hamiltonian operator that is here directly pertainent and the considered Hamiltonian operation that is here directly pertainent as well are maintanined as such per each of the said conistent metrical pulses in which the said superstrings may here be considered as existing in as is according to the given case scenario.  This means that not only would the given operator of the directly related substringular momentum be either identically the same or else indistinguishably replaced over the eluded to extrapolatory-based metric in which such a superstring is here considered, yet, the function of such a substringular momentum would here remain the same over the same given arbitrary directly associated metric (duration that is here under specific consideration).  This not only conisders that the integrable vaible scalar amplitude of the said substrigular momentum is here maintained over the said kinematically-based said duration, yet, it also considers the overall directoral push and/or pull of the both the radial and the transversal tenses of the said superstring over the course of the said whole overall duration that is here under conisderation as being maintained over the eluded to Fourier Transformation.