Course 4 on The Substringular Vs. the Globally Distinguishable, Session 5, Part 1

Energy? Energy is conceptually thought of as motion. When an object consisting of mass is in space, this motion is a form of kinetic energy. An object is usually identified as a phenomenon that has mass. Mass is present on every planet and star (stars are plasmic). Light is electromagnetic energy emitted by an electron when it drops in energy. As said before, mass, energy, and electromagnetic energy are all forms of motion that are founded upon by the same basic increment of phenomenon -- h for transversel energy and h bar for radial energy (h bar is equal to h/2pi). What I mean by "h" is Planck's Constant. What I mean by "h bar" is the radial form of Planck's Constant. H Bar is one radii of wave phenomenon broken down to the next lowest level of discrete from where we are at (next lowest quantum discrete level). Yet h bar is a physical phenomenon. This would need to bear truth, since it was proven that what we call energy and what we call matter are indeed interchangeable when given the appropriate conditions Yet, a physical phenomenon when denoted as an actual thing bears a sense of being an object verses being a translation or motion. So, if what we as humans term as energy is actually a different organization of things verses a translation of actual things in space, then what would one call the actual motion of those said basic increments of energy as that energy is being translated in space? Strings are composed of point particles, or else the said superstrings would not be able to commute and reorganize. As said before, a point particle is usually mainly space (since it is never fully condensed) except for at the location of its field density. This empty void in-between the loci of mini-string fabric is where waves may enter in and interact with each other. It's like the old adage, "Leave slack in the line, but no slop!" I will continue with the suspense later. I hope that my readers are following along. If you read very carefully and are a stringular physicist, you will understand to some extent, anyhow, the direction I am going with this.
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach

Course 4 on Lorentz-Four-Contractions, Session 3, Part 1

So the fields of an electron under a specific instant have to have surface areas that are smooth in shape and in the way that their distributing changes contour unless a definite singularity has acted upon the interconnection of its fields. If the homotopy of the field of an electron is not specific enough under any discrete detection, then the electron will be something other than what an electron is. Electrons are pretty much the same in some ways, yet there are some differences. There is angular momentum and spin-orbital interaction. Electrons mainly differ by where these are and what these are doing. The job of a quantum thing is its eigenfunction. By an eigenfunction, I mean a specific operation. Another aspect of difference is the transition of comparative electrons, either metrically or simply amplitudinally.
A thing is a relation of energy. If a thing exists, it has an operation. An operation is a function. An individual "task" that a particle has as it is propagated is thus its eigenfunction. If something exists, as said before, it has a spot, whether that spot is changing or constant. Where an electron is has more of an effect on its angular momentum. What an electron is doing has more of an effect on its spin-orbital-interaction. This is because the angle that something is placed in is where something is at relative to its surroundings, and a tangible object normally has three dimensions. So, if something is radially stable, it is a sphere. A sphere exists in space. Anything in space touches something, either directly or indirectly. Touch involves tangency or normalcy. Normalcy involves 90 degrees. So, when something pushes to its boundaries due to this defining the limits of what's inside of it, the transpiration of what a given object's tangency is is along the radial tangencies of any particularly defined circumferences that exist along that sphere's surface. The relative placement is arbitrary. The harmonics/anharmonics relation of one tangency is spin related, while the harmonic/anharmonic relation of the norm tangency to this is orbital related. Such motion pushes the electron on, just like X marks the spot. In art, whenever you want to know right where something is relative to a vanishing point, you use two lines. This defines right where the point would be. If you are starting somewhere, and you wanted to know a straight line to a destination you would need to know at least two other points -- where you are going and one in-between. So, by using tangent (norm) radiations in terms of spin and orbit, the transversel and radial motion of the given electron as a unit may be defined with almost certainty. I will conclude with what I am getting at with this session later with part two of Session three. I hope that people are following along with my blog.
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.