Course 4 on The Substringular Vs. the Globally Distinguishable, Session 5, Part 1

Energy? Energy is conceptually thought of as motion. When an object consisting of mass is in space, this motion is a form of kinetic energy. An object is usually identified as a phenomenon that has mass. Mass is present on every planet and star (stars are plasmic). Light is electromagnetic energy emitted by an electron when it drops in energy. As said before, mass, energy, and electromagnetic energy are all forms of motion that are founded upon by the same basic increment of phenomenon -- h for transversel energy and h bar for radial energy (h bar is equal to h/2pi). What I mean by "h" is Planck's Constant. What I mean by "h bar" is the radial form of Planck's Constant. H Bar is one radii of wave phenomenon broken down to the next lowest level of discrete from where we are at (next lowest quantum discrete level). Yet h bar is a physical phenomenon. This would need to bear truth, since it was proven that what we call energy and what we call matter are indeed interchangeable when given the appropriate conditions Yet, a physical phenomenon when denoted as an actual thing bears a sense of being an object verses being a translation or motion. So, if what we as humans term as energy is actually a different organization of things verses a translation of actual things in space, then what would one call the actual motion of those said basic increments of energy as that energy is being translated in space? Strings are composed of point particles, or else the said superstrings would not be able to commute and reorganize. As said before, a point particle is usually mainly space (since it is never fully condensed) except for at the location of its field density. This empty void in-between the loci of mini-string fabric is where waves may enter in and interact with each other. It's like the old adage, "Leave slack in the line, but no slop!" I will continue with the suspense later. I hope that my readers are following along. If you read very carefully and are a stringular physicist, you will understand to some extent, anyhow, the direction I am going with this.
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach