Diffeomorphic Topological Manifold -- Less Likely To Be Spurious, At An Internal Reference-Frame

 A diffeomorphic superstring-related topological manifold, tends to work to bear less of a chance of exhibiting the display of a spurious intrinsic vibration, when this is here to be taken at the Poincare level, to its respective internal reference-frame, than a superstring-related topological manifold, that is not of a diffeomorphic nature. SAMUEL ROACH. TO BE CONTINUED! (PINCKNEY HIGH SCHOOL, 1989);P.S.: THIS MAY SURPRISE YOU, YET, YES, U OF M ANN ARBOR (LEWIS HOUSE, BURSLY HALL) THIS IS MY BLOG!

A Perspective Of Mine -- As To Ancient Sumerian Writings

 When I observe some of the tablets that were inscribed with the "writings" of the ancient Sumerians, it appears to me, that a large amount of the language-related "symbols" that are "written" upon such a correlative set of tablets, appear to be shaped in such a manner, to where these seem to me, to have the appearance, of looking like a symbolic depiction of "conical world-sheets." This strikes me very curiously; because, at least to my particular model of string theory, Noether-Based superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity, just about always tend to bear world-sheets, that are shaped in such a general type of a manner, to where if such said world-sheets were here to be considered over a Laplacian Transformation, (as in a timeless "snapshot" of such said world-sheets), that such said world-sheets are to thence to appear, as conical-like shapes. This is also particularly curious; because it often tends to occur, that it is actually over the durational course, in which superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity are to undergo the Fujikawa Coupling via the Green Function, that the residual surplus energy of electrons, that is here to be released when it is to drop back-and-forth an energy level, that is what often tends to work to form the phenomenology of light. (Although I fully realize that the isoelliptiabelianoid (which is what I call the initial genus, of what we now know of today, as being the Higgs Boson), is the type of phenomenology, that had worked to create the basis of forming the initial superstrings of the multiverse.) So it makes me wonder, is it possible, that the initial superstring-related phenomenology, -- of which actually worked to create the multiplicity of electromagnetic energy, -- was actually discrete kinetic energy; and that such inferred superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity, is thereby what worked, in effect, to then resultantly work to form the initial "light" of the multiverse?! Let me know what you think. SAMUEL.

Substringular Manifold Globalization

 When a given arbitrary cohesive set of metric-gauge eigenstates are to come together, in so as to work to form the general entity of a topological manifold, at the Ward-Cauchy-related level, -- the general Process of the  kinematically delineated gauged-action, that is here to be spatially translated over time, in so as to work to form such an inferred entity of holonomic substrate, may be thought of, as being named, a tense of a Substringular Manifold Globalization. To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (1989).

Some Stuff As To Course 4 Session 5 -- On, the Substringular Versus The Globally Distinguishable

What does energy happen to be? Energy is conceptually thought of as motion. When an object consisting of mass is in space, then, this motion is related to a form of kinetic energy. The holonomic substrate of such energy, may be considered here  -- as those superstrings that work to comprise such kinetic energy, while the Lagrangian of such motion, may be considered here as the Lagrangian of such energy.  Furthermore, an object is usually identified as a phenomenon that has mass. Mass is present on every planet and star (stars are plasmic). Light is electromagnetic energy emitted by an electron, when it drops back-and-forth an energy level. As said before -- mass, energy, and electromagnetic energy, are all forms of motion -- that are founded upon by the same basic increment of phenomenon -- h for transversel energy, and h bar for radial energy (h bar is equal to h/2pi). What I mean by "h" is Planck's Constant. What I mean by "h bar" is the radial form of Planck's Constant. H Bar is one radii of wave phenomenon, when it is broken down to the next lowest level of discrete  from where we are at (next lowest quantum discrete level). Yet h bar is may be considered as a physical phenomenon. This would need to bear truth, since it was proven -- that what we call energy and what we call matter are indeed interchangeable, when given the appropriate conditions. Yet, a physical phenomenon, when denoted as an actual thing -- bears a sense of being an object, verses being a translation or motion. So, if what we as humans term of as energy is actually a different organization of things --  verses a translation of actual things in space, then what would one call the actual motion of those said basic increments is the Lagrangian of this just implied energy.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.