Wednesday, June 30, 2021

A Perspective Of Mine -- As To Ancient Sumerian Writings

 When I observe some of the tablets that were inscribed with the "writings" of the ancient Sumerians, it appears to me, that a large amount of the language-related "symbols" that are "written" upon such a correlative set of tablets, appear to be shaped in such a manner, to where these seem to me, to have the appearance, of looking like a symbolic depiction of "conical world-sheets." This strikes me very curiously; because, at least to my particular model of string theory, Noether-Based superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity, just about always tend to bear world-sheets, that are shaped in such a general type of a manner, to where if such said world-sheets were here to be considered over a Laplacian Transformation, (as in a timeless "snapshot" of such said world-sheets), that such said world-sheets are to thence to appear, as conical-like shapes. This is also particularly curious; because it often tends to occur, that it is actually over the durational course, in which superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity are to undergo the Fujikawa Coupling via the Green Function, that the residual surplus energy of electrons, that is here to be released when it is to drop back-and-forth an energy level, that is what often tends to work to form the phenomenology of light. (Although I fully realize that the isoelliptiabelianoid (which is what I call the initial genus, of what we now know of today, as being the Higgs Boson), is the type of phenomenology, that had worked to create the basis of forming the initial superstrings of the multiverse.) So it makes me wonder, is it possible, that the initial superstring-related phenomenology, -- of which actually worked to create the multiplicity of electromagnetic energy, -- was actually discrete kinetic energy; and that such inferred superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity, is thereby what worked, in effect, to then resultantly work to form the initial "light" of the multiverse?! Let me know what you think. SAMUEL.

No comments: