Interdependent Interaction Of Basic Forces Of Nature

 The greater that the interaction of the overall tense of the i*PI(del) Action is to occur, to where this is proximal local to any one given arbitrary region in time and space, -- the greater that the kinematic differentiation of the delineation of the i*PI(del) Action will consequently tend to be, not only when in consideration of the differential geometry of both the correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittivity and their counter parts, yet also when this is here to be in consideration of the respective proximal local light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that are here to be of that discrete permeability that is in a direct correspondence to the correlative implied discrete permittivity.  The greater that such a kinematic differentiation of the delineation of the i*PI(del) Action is to be, the more of a differential perturbation, that will consequently tend to be formed, as to the thence resultant formed Schwinger-Indices, that are here to be formed by the "plucking" interaction of the proximal local gauge-boson eigenstates With the directly correlative second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates. This will consequently tend to form a heightened interdependent interactive progression of the basic forces of nature upon each other, over any proscribed respective correlative duration of time, in which such a general tense of a super string-related activity is here to occur. To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL  ROACH.

Interdependent Interactive Progression

 In general; the interdependent interactive progression of the multifarious i*PI(del) Action, works to help facilitate the basic ability of first-order point particles, to act upon substringular topology, -- in such a manner, to where this helps in the process of working to allow for the phenomenology of cohomology to reverse-fractal into the phenomenology of charge.  This then, consequently -- works in the process of helping to allow for the Noether Current to reverse-fractal into electrical current (charge per time). SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (PHS1989).

More About Gauge-Bosons

Gauge-Bosons are essential in the field of a light-cone-gauge-eigenstate since, when individual gauge-bosons "pluck" the second-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstates that exist in the field of a first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate, the resulting vibrations are second-ordered Schwinger Indices (the summation of such vibrations per first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate being a first-ordered Schwinger Index) that flow through the Rarita Structure to allow for the Ricci Scalar to function so that gravity may take effect. This is just in reference to the E(6)XE(6) type of gauge-bosons. Just as adjacent electrons have to spin antisymmetrically, to give a reverse-fractored example, in order to obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle, adjacent E(6)XE(6) strings must bear an antisymmetric spin-orbital tensorism in order to not infringe on each others' space. Such an antisymmetric spin-orbital tensorism is caused by the spurious effect of the Chern-Simmons field that exists between adjacent E(6)X(E(6) strings. Such a Chern-Simmons field is due to the condition of such gauge-bosons differentiating per instanton in-between a discrete energy unit of permittivity and a discrete energy unit of energy impedance. So, whether a related light-cone-gauge topology is abelian or non-abelian, the substringular field that binds these gauge-bosons to both sides of an associated first-ordered-light-cone-gauge-eigenstate is primarily abelian so that the "plucking" of the second-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstates will not shatter the given first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate. The fabric of substringular field is what I call "mini-string." Mini-String is the fabric of gauge-action that interconnects the topology of all unfrayed substringular phenomena that forms the homotopic structure of the substringular. My website is http://www.samsphysicsworld@blogspot.com.
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach

The Twelvth Session Of Course Ten

The light-cone-gauge field of a first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate bears five links of mini-string when involving one-dimensional superstrings and ten links of mini-string when involving two-dimensional superstrings.  With the field of a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that involves a one-dimensional superstring, the five mini-loops consist of two segments of mini-sstring each that are looped around each other.  When it comes to the field of a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that involves a two-dimensional superstring, the ten mini-string links are not Gliossi to any mini-string except that of the ten mini-string segments that bind the associated two-dimensioal superstring that is being discussed here with its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace.  A Fadeev-Popov-Trace is the field trajectory of a superstring.  A Fadeev-Popov-Trace is a discrete unit of energy impedance, while a superstirng is a discrete unit of energy permittivity.  A superstirng consequently may be viewed of as a field trajectory of a Fadeev-Popov-Trace, yet, in the opposite tense of holomorphicity as the other way around.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates may either be abelian in geometric nature, or, these mentioned general types of eigenstates may be non-abelian in geometric nature.  An abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstate has a supplemental wave-tug in-between a related arbitrary given superstring and its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace.  The light-cone-gauge topology of an abelian geometric nature is known of as a Kaluza-Klein topology.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates that bear a sinusoidal interconnection between the arbitrary given superstring and its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace are said to be non-abelian.  A non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology is known of as a Yang-Mills topology.  
I will continue with the suspence later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

A Little About The Phenomena Of Superstringular Fields

The field density of a substringular field is the locus of region where the mini-string that most directly subtends from a given arbitrary superstring is so filled with topological holonomic Hodge-substrate that it is impossible -- for all practical purposes -- for another superstring to intersect that density of mini-string that forms the phenomenological entity of the said field density of the given initially so stated superstring unless there is a Gliossi-based cohomological interconnection that binds the two here mentioned superstrings.  Such a field density is two-dimensionally-based in relation to one-dimensional superstrings, and, such a field density is three-dimensionally-based in relation to two-dimensional superstrings.  A cohomology is the touch-based binding of topologically-based entities.  Cohomologies may be either in refference to: the binding of superstrings, the binding of first-ordered-point-particles, the binding of mini-string, or, for that matter, the binding of any phenomena that involves a topological holonomic entitiy.  Cohomologies may often be in refference to world-sheets.  World-Sheets that form a Ward-linear delineation are named Rham cohomologies, while world-sheets that form singularities in terms of the associated Laplacian-Based changes in norm-translation are named Doubolt cohomologies.  Cohomologies, in general, reffer to a Gliossi-Based form of binding via a touch-based coupling that allows more of a direct inter-relation between different substringular phenomena.  I will go back to the third part of session two later.  You have a phenonomenal day!
Sincerely, Sam Roach.           

Part Two Of Course Two Of Course Nine

The operator that I mentioned near the end of the first part of session two is, in their respective cases, one of the following:  a covariant organization of directly affiliated phenomena that are either zero-norm-states,  Hausendorf-Projections,  Campbell-Hausendorf-Projections,  Campbell-Projections, in some cases, simply the mini-string that binds the relative "up" and the relative "down" of  norm-states, or, in other cases, a combination of the just prior types of phenomena.  Such respective types of operators work to pull the scattered norm-states in such a manner so that the ghost anomalies (in some cases) or the just annhilated ghost anomalies (in other cases) may manuver in an appropriate manner around the direct field density of either the two-d fields of one-d superstrings or the 3-d fields of 2-d superstrings.  This helps to describe how -- to an extent -- norm-states work to form either ghost anomalies or to scatter these ghost anomalies so that gravitational particles may have a basis of formation.  I will continue with the third part of this session later!
Hope in anticipation for the suspence!  Sam Roach.    

A Little Dittie About The Light-Cone-Gauge

The light-cone-gauge field of a first-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstate bears five links of mini-string when such a phenomena is involving one-dimensional superstrings, and, a first-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstate that corresponds to the topological Laplacian mapping of a two-dimensional superstring bears ten links of mini-string.  With the field of a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that involves a one-dimensional superstring, the five mini-loops consist of two segments of mini-string that are both looped around each other.  When it comes to the field of a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that involves a two-dimensioanl superstring, the ten mini-string links are not homotopically Gliossi to any mini-string except that of the ten mini-string segments that bind such a given arbitrarily associated two-dimensional superstring with its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace.  A Fadeev-Popov-Trace is the field trajectory of a superstring.  A Fadeev-Popov-Trace is a discrete unit of energy impedance, while a superstring is a discrete unit of energy permittivity.  A superstring, consequently, may be viewed of as a field trajectory of a Fadeev-Popov-Trace, yet in the opposite tense of holomorphicity.  Such a Laplacan mapping of the described field trajection directoralization is based on the same concept, except that here, the mapping bears the opposite chirality.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates may either be abelian in nature, or, these may be non-abelian in nature.  An abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstate has a supplemental wave-tug in-between a given arbitrary superstring and its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace.  The light-cone-gauge topology of an abelian nature is known of a  Kaluza-Klein topology.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates that bear a sinusoidal interconnection between the given superstring and its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace are said to be non-abelian.  A non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology is known of as a Yang-Mills topology.  I will continue with the suspence later!
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.           

Session 15 Of Course Nine

The light-cone-gauge multiplicitly exists between Planck phenomena and superstrings.  The light-cone-gauge corresponding to one-dimensional superstrings consists of five mini-string segments that are in-between an arbitrarily corelative Planck-like phenomena ansd its corresponding one-dimensional fermionic string.  With a bosonic string, there are ten mini-string segments in-between the corelative Planck phenomena and its two-dimensional bosonic superstring.  When a one-dimensional superstring closes via the Fujikawa Coupling as may be mathematically described when using the Greene function, the five doubled up milni-string segments unravel and reconnect to form ten mini-string segments that connect homogeneously along the newly formed two-dimensional bosonic string.  So, when a two-dimensional bosonic superstring undergoes such a Yakawa Coupling via the Greene function to open to form a one-dimensional fermionic string, the ten mini-string segments mentionesd double-up to form five mini-string segments after the ten mini-string segments that were previously mentioned are released and ravled to reconnect in a homogeneous manner.  These switches in mini-string happen during iteration or instanton with the help of gauge bosons.  Gauge bosons are an example of two-dimensional superstrings that are larger than superstrings.  Gauge Bosons spin and roll to allign the light-cone-gauge during the activity that occurs during BRST.  BRST is when the Imaginary exchange of Real residue happens among superstrings that are discrete energy permittivity and their counterparts.  (The counterparts of such mentioned superstrings act as a substrate for the said strings.)  The gauge bosons act as "light-switches" that activate the other heterotic strings.  I will discuss what I mean by that in future courses.  As the gauge bosons counterspin and counter-roll, the corresponding activity levers thru space in a hyperbollic manner so that the other heterotic superstrings are able to spontaneously open when necessary so that their counterstrings may retie as one-dimensional superstrings during certain circumstances, and also so that other phenomena that is directly attached to the corelative substringular encoders may undergo the proper retying during the metric in-between instantons when such retying is prominent.     

Just To Make Sure

Superstrings are made up of beaded first-ordered-point-particles that exist in a Laplacian-based radial path for two-dimensional superstrings and of beaded first-ordered-point-particles that exist in a Laplacian-based linear path for one-dimensional superstrings.  Two-Dimensional superstrings are vibrating hoops of discrete energy permittivity.  One-Dimensional superstrings are vibrating strands of discrete energy permittivity.  The first-ordered-point-particles that comprise superstrings are interconnected via what I term of as mini-string.  Mini-String phenomena comprise the fields of superstrings.  Mini-String is beaded second-ordered-point particles that are interconnected via sub-mini-string.  The second-ordered-point-particles are comprised of by third-ordered-point-particles that are interconnected via sub-mini-string.  Mini-String interconnect superstrings.  The first-ordered-point-particles that comprise superstrings are comprised of metaphoically-based balls-of-yarn-like compactified mini-string.  As superstrings move, the mini-string that comprises the first-ordered point particles that comprise the said superstrings ebb away and back into the first-ordered-point-particles so as to provide a continuous flow of substringular fields.  Second-Ordered-Point-Particles are comprised of third-ordererd-point particles that fill the said second-ordered-point-particles in a metaphorically-based balls-of-yarn-like manner.  The sub-mini-string mers are held together via a fractal of pressurized vacuum-like activity.  The motion of the substrings, their fields, and the entirety of substringular activity is what forms the prior mentioned fractal of pressurized vacuum.  The Fadeev-Popov-Traces which are like a directly reverse-holomorphic field trajectory of superstrings are discrete energy impedance.  Fadeev-Popov-Traces are comprised of by beaded mini-string that forms a Chi-Shape that is interlaced with a figure-eight shape in a Laplacian-like manner.  The motion of discrete energy forms Gliossi-Sherk-Olive ghost anomalies that act as a substrate for the dilatons and dilatinos that are formed when such ghost anomalies are scatterd by the norm-states that strike the said anomalies in the process of the said norm-states motion in the reverse holomorphic direction relative to the arbitrary holomorphic motion of any given superstrings.  So, as superstrings move in an arbitrary holomorphic direction, the norm-states that move in the same arbitrary given holomorphic direction form Gliossi-Sherk-Olive ghosts.  The motion of norm-states that move in the reverse general holomorphic direction at some later metric scatter the mentioned ghosts so as to form that phenomena that consequently form the dilatons and dilatinos that are pulled off of the Real Reimmanian Plane so as to form gravitons and gravitinos that are the gravitational particles that cause the activity of gravity via their affect upon the Rarita Structure via the Ricci-Action.     

About Point Particles

First-Ordered-Point-Particles comprise superstrings.
Second-Ordered-Point-Particles comprise the mini-string that "balls-up" to form first-ordered-point-particles, while these second-ordered particles also form all mini-string that forms substringular fields.
Third-Ordered-Point-Particles only exist so as to form the composition of second-ordered-point-particles.
Sub-Mini-String binds together third-ordered-point-particles as well as interconnecting the said second-ordered-point-particles.
Just as mini-string forms all substringular fields -- and also considering the condition that second-ordered-point-particles are two orders lower in diameter than superstrings --  sub-mini-string is what binds the mentioned second-ordered-point-particles. 
Catch You Two,
Samuel David Roach.                                      

Some More Stough About Gauge-Bosons

Gauge-Bosons are essential in the field of a light-cone-gauge-eigenstate since, when individual gauge-bosons "pluck" the second-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstates that exist in the field of a first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigentate, the resulting vibrations are second-ordered Schwinger Indices (the summation of such vibrations per first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate being a first-ordered Schwinger Index) that flow through the Rarita Structure to allow for the Ricci Scalar to function so that gravity may take effect. This is just in reference to the E(6)XE(6) type of gauge-bosons. Just as adjacent electrons have to spin assymmetrically, to give a reverse-fractored example, in order to obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle, adjacent E(6)XE(6) strings must bear an antisymmetric spin-orbital tensorism in order to not infringe on each others' space. Such an assymmetric spin-orbital tensorism is caused by the spurious effect of the Chern-Simmons field that exists between adjacent E(6)X(E(6) strings. Such a Chern-Simmons field is due to the condition of such gauge-bosons differentiating per instanton in-between a discrete energy unit of permittivity and a discrete energy unit of energy impedance. So, whether a related light-cone-gauge topology is abelian or non-abelian, the substringular field that binds these gauge-bosons to both sides of an associated first-ordered-light-cone-gauge-eigenstate is primarily abelian so that the "plucking" of the second-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstates will not shatter the given first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate. The fabric of substringular field is what I call "mini-string." Mini-String is the fabric of gauge-action that interconnects the topology of all unfrayed substringular phenomena that forms the homotopic structure of the substringular. My website is http://www.samsphysicsworld@blogspot.com.
          

Sincerely,

Samuel David Roach

Part Two of the Thirteenth Session of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here!  Here is the continuation of the thirteenth session of the sixth course of my string theory in accordance with the order of courses that I originally came up with the basis of making.
          
Superstrings that act as waves are like a "thread" and first-ordered point particles are like small "knots" in the previously mentioned "thread."  Superstrings are like "embroided ties" of the previously mentioned "knots."  The stringular fabric never breaks in normal phenomenology except during the space-hole and also except in the case of the unfraying of substringular fabric that happens in the course of phenomena entering into black-holes.  Phenomena that exit black-holes are turned into antimatter that eventually reorganizes into matter.  The good news is that frayed material that is within black-holes can possibly be reconstructed eventually into matter, yet I refuse to want such a fatalistic end result to overshadow a more positive possibility.  (NOYB).  The fields of superstrings are like organized tiny virtual frays that eventually wrap back into mini-string and norm-states (and norm-states are a simple organization of point particles), depending on the tori-sector-range situation.  The lagging of the substringular "information" before an eigenmetric of the recycling of the mentioned substringular phenomena is a perturbation of the other interacting substringular phenomena and also a perturbation of certain point particle "information" to retie in a manner that promotes the perpetuation of all of the related phenomena of the given related tori-sector-range.  God Bless You In the name of Yahweh!  Samuel Roach.

Part Three of the Test Solutions For the Second Test of Course Six

9)  "Steady-State" superstrings, which are superstrings that obey Noether Flow, flow through all three sets of parallel universes in-between the durations of each instanton in order to share unified commutation that works to pull the three mentioned sets of parallel universes into one kinematically-based physical portion of space and time.                                                                                                                                  

10)  The symmetrism/assymetrism of the spin-orbital momentum that is fractorially associated with the activity of first-ordered point particles -- if these are respectively orientable or non-orientable via their intersymmetrisms of substringular field or mini-string -- allows for the proper associations that exist between superstrings that respectively obey both Noether Flow and/or tachyonic flow in such a manner so as to maintain homotopy with optimum ability.

11)  Superstrings remain in motion so that these may stay as the discrete units of energy that allow energy and thus existence to exist at all.  So, in-between each duration of an instanton, each superstring commutes throughout the Ultimon so that these may be tweaked to slow down just enough at instanton to allow us, as life forms, to experience the organization of integrated instantons that we know of as time.

12)  Dark matter exists in the proportion, relative to us, that the reverberation-half of a Kaeler-Metric eigenmetric that pulls a superstring out of a Klein Bottle eigenstate is in relation to the sum of the other reverberation-halves associated with one eigenmetric of a Kaeler-Metric, when taken as a fraction of one sub-metric out of one whole discrete gauge-metric of the described Kaeler-Metric.  Phenomena in a Klein Bottle eigenstate that are not being pulled out at a set general Laplacian bear a Ward Polarization condition relative to the associated reverberation-half that is put into the gauge-metric of the Regge Action.  Such a proportion is reverse fractored by the ratio of dark matter to light matter -- 15 to 1.
Without the Kaeler-Metric, superstrings would lose their permittivity that these need to be the energy that makes up reality.  So, the reverse fractor of the existence of dark matter is an essential product of those Ward Polarized reverberation-halves that mold the mini-loops of superstrings into the relatively discrete eigenstates of metric-gauge that exist as the topological holonomic field structure that maps out discrete loci of substringular permittivity.

A Summary Of Part One Of Session Five Of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here!  I am here today to explain a little bit more what I meant by "chords" in the first part of the fifth session of Course Six.
   
Every first-ordered point particle is interconnected with other first-ordered point particles via mini-string.  Mini-String is the phenomena based substance of substringular fields.  Mini-String is comprised of second-ordered point particles that exist in bi-holomoriphic succession in such a way so as to form curved and straight lines of interconnection that interconnect the first-ordered point particles that form the substance of norm-states, relatively loose point commutators, superstrings, and the counterparts of norm-states and the counterparts of superstrings (not to mention heterotic strings, the Klein Bottle eigenstates, and the Higgs Action eigenstates.  Second-Ordered point particles are comprised of third-orderd point particles.  Third-Ordered point particles only exist in the loci where second-orderd point particles exist in.  Second-Ordered point particles that are adjacent to one another are interconnected with each other via what I term as sub-mini-string.  Sub-Mini-String is thread-like and not pointal in nature.  Sub-Mini-String most directly interconnects third-ordered point particles that are interbound in the loci of second-ordered point particles.  The sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more direct in wave-tug (tending here to imply a condition of conformal straightness or flushness), or, in other words, the sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more abelian in-between second-ordered point particles that are adjacent when the said successive point particles are of the same layer of reality.  A layer of reality is a set of substringular phenomena of one whole space-time-framework of the same or of different universes that have the same ratio of Ying and the same ratio of Yang.  Susbstringular phenomena that are of different layers of reality, when the said phenomena are relating to second-ordered point particles that are adjacent, do not tend to have as abelian of a wave interconnection as adjacent substringular phenomena that are adjacent that are of the same layer of reality.  Here, what I mean by an abelian interconnection is a direct wave-tug that pushes or pulls in a uni-direcoralized Lagrangian.  At the pointal level, such a wave-tug tends to be conformally straight or flush relative to the immediate surroundings of the associated point particles.                                          

A Summary Of Part One Of Session Four Of Course Six

A Fourier Transformation is a description of changes that happen over the duration of the successive series of more than one instanton.  A Laplacian Transformation is a description of changes that happen in space that either do not involve any duration Or a Laplacian Transformation may, in other cases, be a description of changes that happen in space in a duration that is within the metrical duration of one instanton.
Since the future may be changed easier than the past, space-time substance tends to be more granular than fabrical.
         
When a superstring is usually directly affiliated with one layer of reality in one specific universe, than its home tori-sector-range and its home universe tend to be constant -- with no spontaneous changes in the prior named conditions.  The just described condition is considering what is distinguishable to extrapolation and detection, since the mini-string or substringular field substance of individual point particles is interchanged in the process of the recycling of the said holonomic phenomena -- in terms of the specific delineation of the amount, multiplicitly dimensionally curvedness, abelian geometry, permittivity, impedance, Yau Exact and/or Chern Simmons singularity conditions, light-cone gauge conditions, Schwinger wave-tug and wave-pull conditions, condition of holomoriphicity and directoralization, all of the Fock Space components of space and time, and in terms of the specific delineation of the counterpart-related point particles that have partitions that bear opposite Laplacian holomoriphicity relative to the partitions that exist among the point particles that comprise the kinematic operation of space-time superstrings, to where, during each instanton, every apparently indistinguishably different first-ordered point particle and every apparently indistinguishably different superstring is at least partially renewed in such a manner so as to not make a noticeable difference on account of the substringular recycling that involves the intechange of mini-string or substringular field.  Yet, still, the indistinguishable condition of first-ordered point particles and superstrings, that, from all practical appearance are the same over the course of a successive series of instantons, happens during conformal invariance.  The more that a first-ordered point particle and/or a superstring tends to remain in one layer of reality, the more that the said first-ordered point particle and/or the superstring tends to remain in its home tori-sector-range.  So, even if a point or string may vary in the universe that it exists in during the course of a tense of Fourier Transformation, in so long as the universes that the said phenomena differentiate through over the set duration that is here being described, exist in universes that have the exact same pecentage of relative Ying and Yang, then such described substringular phenomena are continuing in the same "layer" of reality.  The condition of substringular phenomena remaining over a prolonged duration in one layer of reality unless a perturbative force bears a direct Gliossi "infringement" upon the said substringular phenomena, is a condition of Fourier Transformation that is conformally invariant when compared to phenomena that are unstable in terms of which layer of reality that such related phenomena exist in -- particularly when the described instability happens spontaneously or without a significantly perturbative force acting directly upon the latest described points or strings that here do not have a stable home tori-sector-range.
                                                                                                                                   
I hope that I have been helpfull!  I will continue the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam.

Summary Of Part Two Of Session Two Of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here!  I am here today to help describe what I meant when I typed in the second part of the second session of Course six.               

In-Between each instanton, there are countless gauge-metrics and sub-metrics, with sub-metrics within these mentioned durations that are even more brief down to very infinitessimal yet discrete durations.  There are also countless, yet relatively fewer gauge-metrics, sub-metrics, and within these metric-related durations that are even more brief down to very infinitessimal yet discrete durations.  During the duration that operates (happens)  in-between instantons, there is alot of sharing of substringular field in terms of the mini-string that is utilized to interconnect all superstrings and norm-states in one giant web-like structure during instanton -- in both indirect and direct ways.  While the countless metrics, sub-metrics, down to the most relatively infinitessimal durations that happen in-between instantons, operate through the operand of space, the sharing of substringular fields occurs via the give-and-take of the ebbing of what I call mini-string that allows for the countless varieties of substringular field integrations that exist per the succeeding series of Laplacian Translations which come together to form the relatively countless yet fewer succeeding series of Fourier Transformations that define the covariant codifferentiation of the multiplicitly interbound substringular fabric -- which is more granular than fabrical -- to allow phenomena to happen through time relative to one another.  The recycling of substringular phenomena is able to hapen in part because of the existence of what I call the Royal Arc, in the general manner that I described in the last summary.  Sincerely, Sam.          

A Summary Of Part One Of Session Two Of Course 6

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here.  I am here today to summarize the first part of Session Two of Course 6.

                  
The physical portion of space-time-fabric may be described as a toroidal disc.  So, in a sense, the physical portion of space-time-fabric may be viewed of as a very large or infinite (even though no phenomenon is actually infinite if it is discrete, therefore this is not actually infinite) world-toroid.
There is a general phenomena that forms a relatively large Arc that interconnects the three sets of parallel universes that I name the Royal Arc.  Certain substringular phenomena that needs to be recycled, in terms of substringular field or mini-string that needs to be redistributed in such a way so that the different forms of ground and norm states may interchange indices, goes through the said general process of recycling via the sub-metric activities, that happen in-between a large number of instantons, through the relatively very large holonomic operand known as the previously stated Royal Arc.

The purpose of the Royal Arc is to recycle globally ground indices gradually into globally norm indices.  Globally ground indices would be the substringular field eigenstates of superstrings (and not their counterparts in this instance) that gradually become recycled into relatively holomorphically based norm-states.  Such recycling happens in such a way in that there is no distinguishable change in the holonomic entity of the described superstrings per the Laplacian Translation of the said superstrings per instanton.  As to what happens to counterstrings and "negative" or relatively reverse holomorphic norm-states in the process of substringular recycling is something that I will describe in a future session.

So, even though superstrings would not even "appear" to recylcle per each succeeding Laplacian framework, their is activity in the form of kinematic metric-gauge that operates in-between successive instantons in such a way so as to allow for the relatively unoticeable interchanges that allow for the substringular recycling that I have been describing.  The reason for substringular recycling is so that substringular fields may have a relative commutation with its surroundings, so that the said substringular fields may have a less direct yet still important commutation with the rest of space and time, so that superstrings, forward holomorphic norm-states, substringular counterparts, and reverse holomorphic norm-states, may share in substringular activities and thus not "overwork" themselves as only one Hamiltonian Operator in terms of kinematic operation over time, and so that jointal and smooth-curveded phenomena may interchange in operation.

I hope that this post answers some of your questions.  Sincerely, Sam.       

Course 6, Session 5, Part 2, The Toroidal Nature of Superstrings

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here! 
First of all, I would like to elaborate as to what I mean by a "chord."  The interconnections that exist in-between all of the second-orderred point particles taken per individual connection of all 91*10^(81) universes of a tori-sector-range that equally involves forward and backward moving time are flush between each individual of such second-ordered point particle and the interconnective one on either of its sides.  Yet, the interconnections that exist in-between all of the second-ordered point particles taken per individual connection of all of the universes of the rest of the tori-sector-ranges do not involve such a flush interconnection in-between the described individual succeeding flow of Laplacian-based second-ordered point particles.
Another way of looking at the concept of a "chord" is that the corresponding interconnections of Planck phenomenon related phenomena that involve the same tori-sector-range tend bear a mini-string connection that tends to be more abelian in Yakawa Gliossi based differential geometry than the corresponding interconnections of Planck phenomenoon related phenomena that involve different tori-sector-ranges.
So, what did I mean by the "moment" that I was just describing near the end of the post that I wrote for part 1 of session 5 of course 6?  If three people were to view the whole substringular Ultimon at once, and  they simultaneously were to observe three tori-sector-ranges -- oneperson viewing each tori-sector-range at once, what each person would describe to each other afterwards would different if they accurately described their persception.  This is because no two tori-sector-ranges are exactly the same, plus, the position and distance from where one observes something effects what your observation is, based from the general concept of Lorentz-Four-Contractions.  The "chords" you would be observing would actually be segments of reiterating group substringular relations of activity, since these would interconnect to each other, and these would all interconnect to other chord-like segments that would interconnect until these would circle around the Ultimon in-between each instanton.  This integration of chord-like segments form a hoop-like majorized surface that exist withing a main world-tube.  Each of such hoops is right beside another single hoop, and there is a world-tube relatively "above" or "below" each main world-tube. Their is also a corresponding world-tube to the relative "right" or "left" of each main world-tube.  This rectange of world-tubes represents a tensoric state of dimensionality, since we are here talking about the main world-tubes of one set of parallel universes, and, each of such hoops has the dimensional potential of exhibiting 32 spacial dimensions plus time.  Each of such "rectangles" forms a ring-like shape.  This "ring" interconnects to two other of such rings.  These three rings form the instanton-related basis of the Ultimon.  Each of such "rings" actually has a basis of three dimensions, though.  Each ring needs the other two in order to have the basis of the three dimensions that life-forms are able to generally perceive in day-to-day living.  The adjacent main world-sheets or world-tubes represent the fact that every dimension has two sides.  The inner/outer world-tube geometric general Ward Conditions represent the fact that time goes both forward and backward simultaneaously in the Ultimon, yet only evenly when under the globally distinguishable terms of the predominant substringular tori-sector-range.  So, each ring-like entity that I just described has a basis of three dimensions, in spite of the ability of each of these to exhibit 32 spacial dimensions plus time, yet each of such "rings" require the other two rings to allow an existence of 96 spacial dimensions plus time, and this ability allows for the fact that we as life-forms observe three spacial dimensions that each have two general sides -- not to mention that the iteration of the substance of these world-tubes allows for the dimension of time.  This should be enough food for thought for right now.  I will continue with the suspense of the third part of this session later. 
In the meanwhile, ponder this.:  How does the inter-relation of energy in terms of discrete permittivity and discrete impedance get effected by what I just wrote?  I will help with this later.  Sincerely, Sam.

Course 4 On The Substringular Vs. The Globally Distinguishable, Session 15, Part One

As a string spins, rolls, and transversely moves along the ultimon, it also moves as an organization of individual points. These individual points not only move as a unit, yet these also reform many times in the process of going between any two locations. So, as a string breaks down into point particles in-between instantons, the individual point particles are constantly iterating and fading as entities in-between each locant that is in the size of a point. This started when time began, and will continue until time ends. As explained, points attempt to obey the Heisenburg Principle and the Pauli Exclusion Principles. Points also involve many waves. The density of a point may be described as condensed oscillation. When the points are pulled "forward," these will be noded out. This will make these to appear faded out. The process of points of a string in-between stringular iterations fading out, and iterating in relation to the behavior of the basis of light effects the ways in which the string iterates in terms of the related Lorentz-Four-Contractions. This is because the ways in which the waves that comprise the partial aspects of the given string differentiate in terms of where these are nodal and antinodal relative to the nodes and antinodes of all of the proximal light eigenstates in such a way so as to influence the way that the string will be measured, as a unit, relative to light, how the string will cohesively integrate relative to the measurements of an observer, and how the parameters that are measured that that given string will differ with where the string is to be localized as a phenomenon that is determined to be in a specific spot in the globally distinguishable. If this given string were to remain as simply a set of point particles that are not and will not reorganize as a string, then the ways in which the given set of points differentiate and the boundary conditions of the vacuum regions that this space will now iterate will form. I will continue with the suspense of this session later. Until then, you have a great day!
Later,
Sam.

FTAAN, Session 9

A point particle as it exists in a superstring has a core diameter of 5*10^(-87) meters. The mini-string that connects to these is 5*10^(-87) meters long. A mini-string has a thickness of 10^(-129) meters. These are taken in the substringular. In the globally distinguishable, these phenomena are 10^8*3 times thicker, since the Lorentz-Four-Contraction works to a factor of 3*10^8. So, in the substringular, the Lorentz-Four-Contractions are maximized for optimal core detection possible. Thus, in the substringular, one has minimal to no increased Lorentz-Four-Contraction. As a point particle of the first-order travels through ultimon flow the given point particle has mini-string taken away by means of it being pulled out of the bundle to where the given point particle has then 10,000 times less volume during the core of ultimon flow, since the associated bundle has less mini-string, although the bundle has the same diameter. The compactified condition of a point particle is densely configured. This densely volumed point during the core of ultimon flow differentiation by a factor of 10,000 to exist at the whole volume of its neighborhood by a certain number of times since the loose bundle discussed is relatively thinned out here. It does this by molding into different morphologies that total to its total volume of a first-ordered point particle a certain number of times within the core of ultimon flow. The volume normally taken up by a first-ordered point particle is known as a point particle neighborhood. A point particle of norm state during the ultimon flow has the volume of a first-ordered point particle of a string during the core of ultimon flow. A point particle of a norm state during BRST is just 50 times smaller in volume to a supersting's point particle during BRST. Point particles of superstrings of non-abelian superstrings are more loose than those of abelian supertrings.