A Certain Tense Of An Inverse Curl

Let's say that one were to consider (e^(Ricci Flow)) to arbitrarily be denoted by a given arbitrary cartesian function, that we will, for simplicity,  term of here as being called "u."  (In meters^2/seconds^2, in one tense or another of a directoral).  The inverse curl of (e^(del(the Ricci Flow))) is then to be congruent in symmetrical effect, to the inverse secant of
(e^(the Ricci  Flow)). I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.

Cevita Flow And Wess-Zumino Flow

Here is some metaphorical "food for thought.":

A "Cevita-based Flow" (the flow of a Cevita Action) tends to produce a tangential substringular flow, whereas, a "Wess-Zumino-based Flow" (the flow of a Wess-Zumino Action) tends to produce a co-tangential substringular flow.

If e^(Cevita-based Flow) were to equal "u":

((e^(del of the Cevita-based Flow))) = ((d/du) (inverse secant of e^(the Cevita-based Flow))).;

Or, if instead, e^(Wess-Zumino-based Flow) were to equal "u":

((e^(del of the Wess-Zumino-based Flow))) = ((d/du) (inverse cosecant of e^(the Wess-Zumino-based Flow))).

To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.