Wave-Tug, Noether Flow, And Approaching Light Speed

Let us consider a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, that is here to be initially traveling transversally in its innate holomorphic direction, in relation to the motion of light.  The more that the Legendre homology-related grouping, that is here to be tugging-along the earlier mentioned mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, in its said implied innate holomorphic direction, -- to where this is here to be working to move the implied respective eigenset, in a linear-based transversal direction (in so far as the curvature of space-time-fabric is to make this feasible enough), in the directorial-related path, that is here to be of the initially inferred forward-holomorphic direction; that is here to be innate to the particular genus of Ward-Cauchy-related field, that is of the given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of this respective case scenario -- over the course of a tense of Noether Flow, the closer that such a said mass-bearing orbifold eigenset will consequently Tend to approach the speed of light. Sincerely, Samuel Roach.(PHS, Class of 1989).

Inhibition Of Noether-Based Flow (Noether Current)

The less inhibited that the Noether-based flow of a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset is to be, the closer that such a respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset will consequently tend to move toward the speed of light.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Samuel David Roach.

A Hint As To Relative Mass And Homotopic Residue

When an external reference frame, that is approaching the speed of light, is to be carrying an internal reference-frame, that is stationary in and of itself -- the maximum speed that the said external reference-frame is capable of going, in the process of traveling in a Noether-based manner -- is based upon the Lorentz-Four-Contraction of:
Lorentz-Four-Contraction here = 3*10^8*(1-(m/(M+m))) = (1/((1-(v^2)/(c^2))^.5))).
This is to where the "m" is here the mass of just the internal reference-frame,
whereas -- the "M" is here the mass of just the external reference-frame, when not including the said internal reference-frame.  The "v" here is the velocity that is to be potentially extrapolated, and "c" is here to mean the speed of light.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Relative "Length" That Is Contracted

Let us consider that the direction that a given arbitrary orbifold eigenset is to be traveling in, is to be in its forward-holomorphic direction.  The relative "length" that is to be contracted, as such a said orbifold eigenset is to be approaching the speed of light -- is to be in the relative respective norm-to-holomorphic/reverse-norm-to-holomorphic Fourier-related positioning/direction.
Think of this in terms of what happens with individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity during the Polyakov Action -- when such an action is to decrease in its scalar amplitude, which is as the correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction is to increase.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Homotopic Residue And Lorentz-Four-Contractions

As an orbifold eigenset approaches the speed of light, over an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- it will then tend to have an increased Lorentz-Four-Contraction.  As such an orbifold eigenset is to have a higher Lorentz-Four-Contraction -- the individually taken superstrings, that work to comprise the said orbifold eigenset -- will then tend to have less partition-based discrepancies, that are directly involved with the contour of their mappable topological sway.  As an orbifold eigenset is to work to bear individually taken composite superstrings of discrete energy permittviity, that work to bear less partition-based discrepancies -- homotopic residue will then tend to be diverging away from the moving differentiale locus, by which the said individually taken superstrings of the said orbifold eigenset are to be moving through over time, -- in the course by which the said orbifold egienset is to then to be going through an accelerated respective given arbitrary Lagrangian-based path, over the said respective given arbitrary evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Orbifold Eigensets -- Different Reference Frames

Let us initially consider a set of superstrings, that operate in so as to form one specific function -- as what is here to be the eminent presence of one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset.  Let us consider that the respective orbifold eigenset of this case, is to bear a relatively high scalar amplitude of a tense of Majorana-Weyl-Invariance -- when this is taken at an internally-bearing of a Ward-Cauchy-based reference frame.  Next, let us say that the orbifold eigenset as a whole phenomenon, is to here to be moving in a transversal-based manner -- via a discrete unitary Lagrangian, in such a manner to where the scalar magnitude of the said orbifold eigenset's velocity, as it is traversing its so-eluded-to discrete unitary path, is here to be about cosine(30 degrees)*(the speed of light).  As the said orbifold eigenset is here to be traveling in a relatively "straight" manner at a rate of cosine(30 degrees)*(the speed of light), -- it is here to bear a Lorentz-Four-Contraction upon its internally composite set of superstrings -- that are here to work to make-up the so-stated orbifold eigenset, of a factor of two.  So, as those superstrings that are here to move in a tense of Noether Flow, as these discrete quanta of energy are here to be working to comprise the said orbifold eigenset, -- each of the superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that  work to help at forming the so-stated eigenset, are to then to bear a Lorentz-Four-Contraction of a factor of two. This would as well work to mean, that the here involved Polyakov Action that is to be directly correlative in this case, would then work to bear a scalar amplitude of a factor of 1.5*10^8.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Lorentz-Four-Contractions, Session 7, Part 1

How does motion change as it exists relative to light? First, let us look at how time varies for an object relatively speaking as the given object changes in speed. This is because time is the "procedure" in which events take place, and the occurrence of events requires some sort of material medium which we signify here an "object." If you had 300 runners, and they ran a race, yet they all finished the race at different times, then, if they all started the race at the same "place" and at the same "time", then all 300 runners would have averaged a different speed during the race. Since having a different average speed means that one has had a different motion in terms of speed relative to light, that would mean that the extrapolated time that all 300 runners encountered during the race would be different. Yet how fast is light. Very much faster than any of the runners. So much faster that any differences in the extrapolated time that any of the runners would encounter would be quite minimal. Now let's say you were in a rocket ship that traveled eight-tenths of the speed of light. Let us say that you traveled in this ship for what would be for you six seconds. The amount of time elapsed on earth would be roughly 10 seconds. How do I figure? The rocket, including yourself, is traveling at eight-tenths the speed of light, or .8c. .8 squared is .64. 1-.64 = .36. the square root of .36 is .6. This means that .6 seconds for you in the ship would happen for you in the ship, while one second would happen here on earth for a standerby who was motionless. Or, 6 seconds would happen for you in the ship while 10 seconds would happen down on earth. The equation for this is:
t=(1-(v^2/c^2)^.5).