What I Perceive Of As The Cohomology-Related Template And The "Force"

Here's something that I have mathematically worked with, as I currently perceive this, as a means of working to determine a general type here of a relationship, between the general tense of a cohomology-related template, and the "force." :

Let us initially and briefly explore the consideration of a few different general concepts.  Let us consider a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, that is of a particular general genus of a symplectic-related field, -- to where this said symplectic field is here to be transferred in a kinetic manner, over time, by a genus of a Khovanov-related field -- to where the inferred Legendre homology, that is here to be kinematically working to translate the mass-bearing orbifold eigenset through space over time, is here to be of a genus of field, that is here to act as a heuristical counter part to the implied mass-bearing symplectic field.  Next; Consider the general Union Set of eigenindices, that are here to act in common, between both the earlier implied mass-bearing field And the respective correlative kinetic-bearing field, -- and treat this as a theoretical eigenstate, via a little bit of tweaking.  Next; Consider a cohomology-related template, that may help one to mathematically translate that general type of a reverse-fractal, that is of the particular type of format, that may be present in any one given arbitrary respective case, to where one is then to consequently derive a tense of charge, to where such a charge, is here to be at a Less microscopic level. Next; consider what I have mentioned once, as the E(8)XE(8) stringular oscillation-based tendency, -- as this may here be thought of as being the source of that general type of an effect, that works to act to either form the general fortification or the general weakening of Chi-related entities in time and space.
Let's call the implied E(8)XE(8) oscillation-related tendency, "Chi.";
Let's next call the union set of eigenindices, that are here to be tweaked into an eigenstate, "U."
Let's next call the cohomology-related template mentioned here, "Gamma."

Consequently, in a non perturbative case, when the "force" is holomorphic in its delineation, then:
Chi = (((U*Gamma) + (U^2*Gamma^2 + 4*U)^.5)/2). -- to where this is the basic tendency.

Furthermore, in a non perturbative case, when the "force" is anti holomorphic in its delineation, then:
Chi = (((U*Gamma) - (U^2*Gamma^2 + 4*U)^.5)/2). -- to where this is the basic tendency.

Again, this is what I perceive in the math that I did earlier.  I thought that I would share this with you.  If one can come up with any viable changes or improvements upon this, more power to you!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Fortification Due To Oscillation-Based Tendencies

Just as the E(8)XE(8) Ward-Cauchy-related oscillation-based tendency operates, in so as to work to help at fortifying the structural integrity of their correlative orbifold eigensets -- the general action of E(6)XE(6) strings, in so as to work to form their pertinent correlative oscillation-based tendency among light-cone-gauge eigenstates -- works to help at fortifying the structural integrity, of those light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that work to form the discrete energy impedance of the directly corresponding orbifold eigensets, that are comprised of, in part, by these said light-cone-gauge eigenstates.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

E(6)XE(6) Strings And Oscillation-Based Tendencies

Just as the oscillation-based tendency of the multiplicit E(8)XE(8) string works, in so as to help in the structural integrity of its respective orbifold eigenset -- the oscillation-based tendency of the multiplicit E(6)XE(6) string works, in so as to help in the structural integrity of its respective light-cone-gauge eigenstate.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.