Showing posts with label Fourier Transform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fourier Transform. Show all posts

Friday, December 3, 2021

Holomorphic-Driven Collinear Homeomorphic Waves

 When two different and distinct covariant holomorphic-driven collinear homeomorphic waves, are to strike "head-on," these two different respective individually taken waves, will consequently tend to result, in working to bear the formation of the general proximal local presence, of a set of anti-holomorphic Kahler conditions, in the general process of working to bear the general condition, of a Ward-Supplemental tense of behavior. This will, in the process, often tend to occur, over the general processes, in which there is here to be the proximal local behavioral presence, of a tense of one or more Chern-Simons singularities, of which are here to be incurred, upon the kinematic gauge-metric-related action, of these two earlier stated different and distinct respective individually taken waves, as such a dual covariant tense of a topological collision, as taken over the Fourier Transform of a respective dual tense of a Lagrangian, is thence to work to bear the general supplemental Hamiltonian inter-reaction, that is of such an inferred Yukawa Coupling, as this is here to be taken, in a spontaneous manner, that is to immediately ensue the inferred Gliosis-Based contact, in which the immediately externalized fields, that are of both of such individually taken Ward-Cauchy-Related waves, are here to work to bear an eminent strike of dimensional-related pulsation upon one another, in so as to work to form the earlier implied condition, of the earlier stated tense of Ward-Supplemental behavior. I WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SUSPENSE LATER!  TO BE CONTINUED! SINCERELY, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (1989).

Saturday, January 16, 2021

Recursive Manner Of Smooth Ricci Flow

 When a relatively smooth Ricci Flow is to be exhibited, by a cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, --  that is here to recursively go back-and-forth, from working to display a radial-related sway, to working to display a transversal-related sway, to working to display a radial-related sway, and so on, -- this general type of a kinematic-related activity, will often consequently tend to work to cause a relatively heightened drive -- in the respective given arbitrary angular momentum, that is here to be directly appertaining to the holomorphic wave-tug, of the Hamiltonian fractal of "thrust," that is here to be exhibited, by the Lagrangian-based motion, of the Fourier Transform, that is here to be correlative to the spatial transference of the earlier mentioned cohesive set of discrete energy quanta in question. SAMUEL. (1989).

Sunday, January 10, 2021

Isotropic Stability And Homeomorphic Field

 The more isotropically stable, that the Fourier Transform, that is here to be of a Noether-based mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, is to be translated as, while it is here to work to bear the general manner of exhibiting the workings of a De Rham cohomology -- while such a herein stated cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, is here to be transferred through time and space -- from one spot to another, -- the more likely that the mappable-tracing, that is here to be of the cohomology-related projection, of the inferred directly corresponding propagated path, that is correlative to the direction of the Lagrangian-based path, that the earlier mentioned mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, is here to be traveling along, over a duration, that is here to work to involve a sequential series of group-related instantons, (as taken, over an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric), this will thereby often consequently tend to result, in the exhibition or display, of the propagation of a respective genus of a homeomorphic field. I will continue with the suspense later! Sincerely, SAMUEL ROACH. (1989).

Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Metric-Gauge-Related Pulsation And Holomorphic Subtension

Let us initially consider two different given arbitrary orbifold eigensets, that are here to be working to bear a Yukawa-related coupling upon one another -- to where the resultant inferred overall interdependent field, that is thus formed by the consequential kinematic interaction of the two different implied cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, -- is to be of a nature, that is here to be both covariant, co-differentiable, and co-determinable, over a relatively limited span of time (of which may be mathematically considered in this case, via the application of a correlative Fourier Transformation).  If both of the herein stated orbifold eigensets, when individually taken in respect to the other correlative orbifold eigenset of such a given arbitrary case scenario, are to be subtended in the relative holomorphic path of the other respective orbifold eigenset, -- then, the consequential resultant interdependent covariant field, that is thus formed by the Yukawa-related coupling of these two inferred cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta upon each other, will then tend to work to bear a relatively greater absolute value of a scalar magnitude of metric-gauge-related pulsation, -- than if these two different earlier implied interdependent orbifold eigensets were, instead, to not be subtended in the holomorphic path of one another, -- over the durational course of the earlier inferred tense, of a correlative Fourier Transform.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Theoretical Robin Boundary Condition At the Relative Norm-To Reverse-Holomorphic End Of An Orbifold Eigenset

Let us initially consider a given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, that is here to have a Robin Boundary Condition imposed upon it -- at the relative norm-to-reverse-holomorphic end of the said respective orbifold eigenset.  Let's say that the holonomic substrate, that is here to work to help in comprising this said Robin Boundary Condition, -- is to be maintained in its structure -- via the general tense of a respective homogeneous geometrical field, that is here to be relatively flush in its Gliosis-related contact, with the said relative norm-to-reverse-holomorphic topological surface of the said orbifold eigenset, at the internal-reference-frame of the so-stated eigenset, that is being discussed here.  Let us next say; that the one tightly-bound limiting surface, that was here to work to inhibit any spatial transference of the said oribifold eigenset, beyond its initially stated relative norm-to-reverse-holomorphic insulated plane  -- is to act, at a reference-frame that is External to the here stated eigenset, in such a manner, -- to where this may "teeter-totter" back-and-forth, like a see-saw, as such a said orbifold eigenset is to be translated over time and space, via a correlative Fourier Transform.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely Samuel David Roach.

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Resultant Binary Lagrangian-Based Paths

If one were to initially have two different distinct orbifold eigensets, that are here to be traveling in a way in so as to be working to express two different respective unitary Lagrangian-Based paths, in such a manner, to where these two so-stated orbifold eigensets are here to spontaneously become Yukawa to one another in a symmetric way, that is both covariant, codeterminable, and codifferentiable at the Poincare level that is relative to the proximal local region in which these said eigensets are here to be transferred -- via the explication of their respective Fourier Transform, then, this may often work to help in causing these two different orbifold eigensets, that had initially been working to form their motion through space as two different distinct substringlar entities, that were here to start in so as to be forming a unitary Lagrangian-Based path, to then instead, to be working to form their motion through space, as a pair of distinct substringular entities, that are here to then form a dual tense of a binary Lagrangian-Based path, -- over the course of a relatively transient evenly-gauge Hamiltonian eignemetric.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Friday, August 31, 2018

Path-Related Bundle And Legendre Homology

Let us initially consider a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset -- which is a set of mass-bearing discrete quanta of energy, that operate in so as to perform one specific function, over a sequential series of group-related instantons -- that may be be described of via a Fourier Transform, that is of an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  The directly corresponding mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that work to comprise the said mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, are each, individually taken, as working to bear a symplectic homology -- which may be described of as being cohomological entities.  The generation of the Lagrangian of such cohomological entities works here, in so as to help in the delineation of superstrings that are here, individually taken, to exhibit a tense of working to bear a Legendre homology.  What I am describing here -- is that the generation of the actual motion of the closed-strings that are of a mass-bearing nature -- works to help here at delineating the proximal local presence of isotropically stable superstrings, that are here of the nature of plain kinetic energy.  The so-eluded-to multi-dimensional delineation of the said Legendre homology, of which is here of the nature of being a tense of plain kinetic energy -- is to work to bear a path-related bundle, that is here to work to involve the proximal local presence of the condition of Chern-Simons Invariants.  Let's next say that each general directoral-related partial function, that is correlative to the said path-related bundle -- is to be expressed in this given arbitrary case -- as one quadratic-based equation.  Let us next say that the said path-related bundle is here to involve the presence of eight covariant, codeterminable, and codifferentiable spatial parameter-related physical dimensions -- that may be expressed in a manner as being of a product of eight of such so-eluded-to directoral-based quadratic equations, -- as to here to be appertaining to working to help at describing the Lagrangian-based path of the earlier-mentioned Legendre homology, that is of a multidimensional open-loop of substringular topological stratum.  If one were to then to consider the product of four of the eight of such directoral-related equations, that are here to help at working to describe the path-related bundle of such a Legendre-related superstring -- as it is to here to be working to exhibit the attributes of the Ward-Cauchy-related conditions of its correlative Chern-Simons Invariants -- and, if one were to then to take the overall expression of the said Chern-Simons Invariants of such a Legendre homology in the said exhibition of the so-eluded-to eight spatial dimensions, and if one were to then to divide this expression by the product of the earlier-mentinioned respective given arbitrary path-related bundle of the respecitve given arbitrary four directoral-related equations, -- this will then tend to indicate, what would here amount to an attenuation of the dimensional-related pulsation of the said correlative Legendre-related homology.  Such an attenuation of dimensional-related pulsation, will then work to form the presence of a set of one or more proximal local metric-based Chern-Simons singularities that are of a dampening nature, over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Monday, May 21, 2018

Spinors And Dilatinos

Take the expression for the euclidean expansion, that is of any one given arbitrary Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Spinor eigenstate -- that is of cotangent bundle R4.  This just mentioned expression -- of which is here to be in terms of its scalar amplitude, is here to be considered when this is coupled while from within the framework of its directoral-related conditions.  The respective externalized reference-frame, via which this said eigenstate that is spinning in a back-and-forth manner at an internal reference-frame -- is here to be, as well, propagating through a Lagrangian-based path in a kinematic manner, via a Fourier Transform as a Hamiltonian operator, in a transversal manner, over time.  Now -- couple the said expression for the euclidean expression of the said spinor, with both the brief time that it is propagating through as it is traveling (as is it is spinning) along the course of its said Lagrangian-based path, AND a pointal-related mass, AND the average angle that the here mentioned spinor is to be spinning in a back-and-forth manner through, as it is spinning via a central coniaxial.  At this point in derivation -- the just eluded-to metric-gauge-related pulsation per cubic directoral-based meter -- that is here to be resulted in, may be thought of as a dilatino.  The consideration of meter that I have mentioned here, is generally to be conveyed, via the usage of the correlative Hodge-based indices that are of any one respective given arbitrary case. Such so-eluded-to Hodge-Indices, are to directly correspond to the correlative litigee of directorals, that are here to be most applicable to the coherent Ward-Cauchy-related situation of such a general genus of a case.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Conformal Dimension And Charge

The discrete number of spatial dimensions that any physical phenomenon is to exist in, will always be of an integer amount -- such a general genus of a number, will always come into play as a packet of spatial dimensions that are here to be considered, -- such as in the case to where, one can not metaphorically have a fraction of a person, yet, one will always have an integer number of people in such a general genus of a metaphor, of which would obviously be the situation in any given case.  Yet, the conformal dimensionality of a Ward-Cauchy-related phenomenon, will just about never be equal to the directly corresponding discrete dimensionality.  The conformal dimension of an eminently potentially generative world-sheet, will tend to be equal to just over the scalar amplitude of what its correlative discrete dimensionality will happen to be.  When one is to have a generative 3 dimensional world-sheet, that is here to be kinematic over a set Fourier Transform -- it will tend to have a conformal dimension of anywhere from just over 3, up to 3+(1.6022*10^(-19)) spatial dimensions -- over the directly corresponding so-eluded-to set evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  If the conformal dimension of the just mentioned 3 dimensional world-sheet is to exceed a scalar amplitude of 3+(1.6022*10^(-19)), it will either tend to spontaneously decompactify into a world-sheet of 4 spatial dimensions plus time (to where such a said decompactification will here to be happening in and of its own accord), or else it will release a discrete quantum of cohomological-related homotopic residue -- that is here to be discharged externally from the Poincare-related Ward-Cauchy bounds of the directly corresponding proximal local region, that is of its correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, in such a manner to where this will be indicated by the generation of a discrete charge, in the form of an electron volt, -- as a general example. I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Monday, December 18, 2017

Homology Versus Cohomology

Here is the basic difference between what a homology is, versus what a cohomology is:
A homology is the physical memory as to the when, the where, and the how, that either an open substringular strand or an open substringular loop has differentiated, as a Hamiltonian eigenindex, over time.  A cohomology is the physical memory as to the when, the where, and the how, that a closed substringular loop has differentiated, as a Hamiltonian eigenindex, over time.  Such physical memories may be anywhere from being at a proximal locus, that is just external to the core-field-density of the superstring -- in other words, at the Ward-Cauchy-based field that is just external to the topological stratum of the substringular eigenindex, -- to being as a physical memory that may be extrapolated from the effect of such a respective strand or a loop, that has here to have just potentially differentiated through a Lagrangian that may be mapped-out, over a Fourier Transform that involves a sequential series of instantons.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Saturday, December 9, 2017

Photons And Rham Cohomology

Let us initially consider a given arbitrary photon -- that is moving transversally via a unitary Lagrangian-based path, -- in so as to work to form a Rham cohomology, over an evenly gauged Hamiltonian metric.  Such a photon may be said to be basically just generating cohomology in such a case (as opposed to degenerating cohomology).  Next, let us say that the said photon is to, all of the sudden, be scattered upon a phenomenology of holonomic substrate -- that such a photon is to eminently become Yukawa towards, in a Gliosis-related manner, -- at an instance of time.  Once the said photon has been scattered -- the consequently entropic photon is to then to briefly be just degenerating cohomology, as it is in the consequent operation of its perturbated Fourier Transform (as opposed to generating cohomology).  As such a so-stated photon is here to have then to have acted as an entropic eigenstate that is, over one relatively transient gauged-metric, to have gone from its prior condition of just generating cohomology -- into a state of Ward-Cauchy-based conditions, to where it is instead to be just degenerating cohomology, -- the photon of such a given arbitrary case scenario, that has just become entropic, is to now be moving along in such a manner -- to where it is to then to be working to form a Doubolt cohomology, -- in so long as the so-stated photon is in the process of scurrying via  the process of radiative scattering.  Once the said photon is to go back into quantizing with other light, -- then, the said photon will tend to return to going back into the tendency of basically  just  generating cohomology, via the Hamiltonian processes of a consequently formed Rham cohomology -- that will be aptly utilized instead, in such a case.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Friday, December 8, 2017

Perturbative Cohomological Eigenstates

Besides the more obvious general reason as to why an initially Rham-based cohological eigenstate, is to be perturbated into the ensuing general tense of a cohomological stratum, that is known of as a Doubolt cohomology, -- as to when a Rham cohomology is to scatter upon another cohomology, in such a manner that the initially mentioned Rham cohomology is to then to tend to become, instead, of the said Doubolt-related nature, -- there is as well to be one other epifany-related additional general alterior reason -- as to why an initial Rham cohomology is to eventually become of a Doubolt nature, to where this is because of the eventual spontaneous proximal local presence of certain entities, which may be as both group-attractors and/or the proximal local presence of certain entities, which may be as ghost-inhibitors, -- to where both of such just mentioned general categories of what would generally be as the nature of being Cevita-related Hamiltonian operators, are here to have an eminent tendency of, via the innate Hamiltonian operation of the activity of their respective Fourier Transforms, to helping at causing a peturbative effect upon both the pulsation and/or the path-based flow of the so inferred orbifold eigenset, that  was to initially be functioning as a Hamiltonian operator that was here to be undergoing a Fourier Transform -- via the mappable-tracing of the initially mentioned Rham cohomology, that is here to be extrapolated as to then of becoming of a Doubolt cohomology, over an evenly gauged  Hamiltonian operation.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Some Stuff As To Kovanov Homology

Here is one way to possibly look at the relations of a correlative Kovanov homology.:
Let us initially consider an orbifold eigenset, that is being translated across a gauged-metrical-transform -- over one given arbitrary Fourier-related Transform.  Let us say that the directly corresponding Chern-Simons Invariants -- when this is taken in terms of both the correlative pulsation and the correlative delineation of the said orbifold eigenset -- is to here be of a trivial isomorphic-based nature, as the said eigenset is to here to be translated via a Hamiltonian operand, that is to be correlative to a Lagrangian-based path -- that is to here to be of an innately Rham-related nature, over the so-eluded-to relatively transient duration in which the said orbifold eigenset is to be acting as such.  Under such an inferred set of Ward-Cauchy-based conditions -- such an orbifold eigenset will then tend to be of a hermitian nature, -- both in terms of its Lagrangian-based tendencies, as well as in terms of its metrical-based tendencies, -- in so long as such a correlative metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operation is to be gauged of as an even function, over time (to where time is here to be a given arbitrary sequential series of group-related instantons).  I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Monday, July 24, 2017

Lorentz Invariance

Let us consider one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- that is to here to be undergoing a respective proximal local relative state of Majorana-Weyl-Invariance.  Such an orbifold eigenset is to here to be existent under a tense of conformal invariance, that, let us here presume -- is to here to be translated via a Fourier-based Transformation, that is to here to be moving, at least transiently, at a relatively constant rate, over time.  At the Poincare level to the Gliosis-based topology of the external shell of such a said orbifold eigenset -- one may say that such an eigenset, as an eigenstate, may at least be exhibiting some sort of a transient tense of a state of Lorentz Invariance.  Next -- let us consider what is to here to be going on at the Poincare level to the Gliosis-based topology of those individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are to here to work to comprise the overall discrete energy quantum of the so-stated orbifold eigenset -- over that gauged group-metric, in which the said orbifold eigenset is, in and of itself, to be at least transiently Lorentz Invariant. Since such individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are to constantly to be moving the scalar magnitude of either both the Planck Length and/or the Planck Radius, per each succeeding iteration of group-related instanton -- the so-stated individually taken respective strings are to constantly be perturbating in their relative rate of Fourier-related Transform -- when this is taken in a general relation to both the existence and the motion of electromagnetic energy, per each succeeding so-stated iteration of group-related instanton.  Therefore -- at the Poincare level to the Gliosis-based topology of the holonomic substrate of any individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, -- such discrete increments of energy quanta are not to act here as being Lorentz Invariant, as such eigenindices that work here in so as to help at comprising the said orbifold eigenset, are to here to act as metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operators, that work together as a group, in so as to perform that specific respective given arbitrary function, that its so-eluded-to reverse-fractal-based orbifold eigenset is to operate in so as to do, as a Ward-Cauchy-based eigenstate, over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Types Of Time

This may not be perfect here, specifically, yet it is a definent movement in the direction of truth.
For every instanton that occurs for a specific individual life form, there are 3*(10^8) different speeds in which this time may appear to transpire. This is considering one iteration of Laplacian Transform. So, if you want to consider all of the theoretical varieties in which time appears to happen, multiply the number of instantons that exist for the total life spans of the total number of life forms that exist in one iteration of Tau, and multiply this number by 3*(10^8). So, we all experience the flow of time during the Fourier Transform of successive series of instantons as well as per each individual Laplacian condition that exists for all of the partially integrated redistributions of each associated described life form over the course of their physical existence.