Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Conformal Dimension And Charge

The discrete number of spatial dimensions that any physical phenomenon is to exist in, will always be of an integer amount -- such a general genus of a number, will always come into play as a packet of spatial dimensions that are here to be considered, -- such as in the case to where, one can not metaphorically have a fraction of a person, yet, one will always have an integer number of people in such a general genus of a metaphor, of which would obviously be the situation in any given case.  Yet, the conformal dimensionality of a Ward-Cauchy-related phenomenon, will just about never be equal to the directly corresponding discrete dimensionality.  The conformal dimension of an eminently potentially generative world-sheet, will tend to be equal to just over the scalar amplitude of what its correlative discrete dimensionality will happen to be.  When one is to have a generative 3 dimensional world-sheet, that is here to be kinematic over a set Fourier Transform -- it will tend to have a conformal dimension of anywhere from just over 3, up to 3+(1.6022*10^(-19)) spatial dimensions -- over the directly corresponding so-eluded-to set evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  If the conformal dimension of the just mentioned 3 dimensional world-sheet is to exceed a scalar amplitude of 3+(1.6022*10^(-19)), it will either tend to spontaneously decompactify into a world-sheet of 4 spatial dimensions plus time (to where such a said decompactification will here to be happening in and of its own accord), or else it will release a discrete quantum of cohomological-related homotopic residue -- that is here to be discharged externally from the Poincare-related Ward-Cauchy bounds of the directly corresponding proximal local region, that is of its correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, in such a manner to where this will be indicated by the generation of a discrete charge, in the form of an electron volt, -- as a general example. I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: