The First Part of the First Session of Course One

Think about it. Stuff exists. Things come into play the way that they do based on the summed happenings that preceded this. A limited mind can not possibly be consciously aware of everything that has ever happened, is happening, or ever will happen by the very nature of the word limited. Yet, through a little knowledge and rational thinking, there are many things about life that you may determine through PATTERNS. For example: One plus one is two. You could never count to two trillion, yet you just know that one-trillion plus one-trillion is two trillion. Of course, you might add. That takes no grandiose knowledge. But did you notice here that you did this with a pattern? Can you think of many other patterns that fit this example? Sure.

            
Another aspect of rational thinking is CLUE FITTING. If you ate one calorie of food, this alone couldn’t possibly make you gain one pound of fat non-water weight, since one pound of fat non-water weight due to calories consists of roughly 3,500 calories. Two things cannot occupy the same spot at the same time. An ice cube cannot remain frozen in a hot pan. Etc… .

Yet another aspect of rational thinking is FAMILIARITY. You know that ice is colder than water. Day is brighter than night. Steel is harder than felt.

Yet another aspect of rational thinking is ROLE PLAYING. I don’t mean pretending necessarily that you are everything, yet putting a situation into a scenario to where through familiarity, clue fitting, and patterns, you may estimate an interaction and/or a set of interactions.

Another aspect of rationality is DISTINGUISHABILITY. If you can distinguish similarities, differences, if something exists and where that is, and what it is collecting and/or giving off, then you may become more actively familiar with what you are talking about.

Finally, and aspect of rationale is BOUNDEDNESS AND SENSE OF DIRECTION.

If you know where you are and where you can go, then you are in less danger than if you don’t. Knowing something’s limitations may go hand-in-hand with the potential locations in which the object may travel.

Solutions To Test One of Course One

1)The six keys to logical organization are: Patterns, Clue Fitting, Familiarity, Role


Playing, Distinguishability, and Boundedness and Sense of Direction.

             

2)An example of Patterns is knowing that one trillion plus one trillion is two trillion

by knowing that one plus one is two. An example of Clue Fitting is realizing that one

calorie of food alone could not of itself cause a gain of one pound of fat non-water

weight. An example of Familiarity is knowing that day is brighter than night.

An example of Role Playing is understanding how electrons want to work toward their

most relaxed state. An example of Distinguishability is understanding right from wrong.

And an example of Boundedness and Sense of Direction is knowing a city’s limits, and

knowing how to get somewhere in that city.



3) to 6) are Pictorial. See the Related Pictorial Solutions.



7)Change can’t be constantly jointal because some aspects of reality are radially

dependent.



8)Change can’t be constantly smooth because some aspect of reality are linearly

dependent.                                                                                  

Part One of Something That Was Intended Earlier

Think about it. Stuff exists. Things come into play the way that they do based on the

             
summed happenings that preceded this. A limited mind can not possibly be consciously

aware of everything that has ever happened, is happening, or ever will happen by the

very nature of the word limited. Yet, through a little knowledge and rational thinking,

there are many things about life that you may determine through PATTERNS. For

example: One plus one is two. You could never count to two trillion, yet you just know

that one-trillion plus one-trillion is two trillion. Of course, you might add. That takes no

grandiose knowledge. But did you notice here that you did this with a pattern? Can you

think of many other patterns that fit this example? Sure.

Another aspect of rational thinking is CLUE FITTING. If you ate one calorie of food,

this alone couldn’t possibly make you gain one pound of fat non-water weight, since one

pound of fat non-water weight due to calories consists of roughly 3,500 calories. Two

things cannot occupy the same spot at the same time. An ice cube cannot remain frozen

in a hot pan. Etc… .

Yet another aspect of rational thinking is FAMILIARITY. You know that ice is colder

than water. Day is brighter than night. Steel is harder than felt.

Yet another aspect of rational thinking is ROLE PLAYING. I don’t mean pretending

necessarily that you are everything, yet putting a situation into a scenario to where

through familiarity, clue fitting, and patterns, you may estimate an interaction and/or a set

of interactions.

Another aspect of rationality is DISTINGUISHABILITY. If you can distinguish

similarities, differences, if something exists and where that is, and what it is collecting

and/or giving off, then you may become more actively familiar with what you are talking

about.

Finally, and aspect of rationale is BOUNDEDNESS AND SENSE OF DIRECTION.

If you know where you are and where you can go, then you are in less danger than if

you don’t. Knowing something’s limitations may go hand-in-hand with the potential

locations in which the object may travel.                   

PART 1 OF SESSION 2 OF COURSE 1

We will now focus on ROLE PLAYING. Two baseballs are shot at each other. Let us say that these balls go in a straight line and thus do not drop significantly. If you are familiar with projectile motion, you will know that if the balls were at any significant distance from each other, they must have been shot at a pretty fast rate of speed. The balls also must have struck each other soon after these were shot out. Otherwise, you would know from your familiarity, the balls would have dropped significantly. From clue fitting, you know that the balls would have to collide, since there was no information about any anomalous interference. And, through familiarity and patterns, you would know that when two of such objects collide at such a rate, hitting fast and in a straight line, these will rebound and/or be knocked further along. Through experimentation, you would see that, yes, if both baseballs struck at the same speed on their white parts, had the same solidity, had the same weight, and had the same roll and spin, these would rebound back in the same direction that these came from. Yet any alteration in these circumstances would probably effect this. In physics, one takes an ideal situation, considers the effects of common actual events in order to know what happened/happens/or is going to happen to whatever venture you are going to consider, in order to hopefully and theoretically do something of practical worth. If this is theory alone, you are talking plain physics. If this is applied you are talking engineering. College courses on physics generally talk a lot about math. Math interrelates concepts logically so as to come up with a solution that fits the need. Sometimes, the solution may indicate the simplicity of meeting that need -- or even that the need is immaterial. Equations have their place, yet this is not my focus. Math may be totally used without gorging on equations. The important part of math is the general order of magnitudes, directions, and tenses, along with other aspects, that describe the contexts and environments that issue a basis to answering whatever problem it is that you need to solve. The more that you understand physics, the more you will see that there are many things to the simplest thing, but that even complex issues may be solved by patterns.


This may seem odd, yet picturing yourself as the physical scenario may make it easier to understand the interactions involved. Getting your mind off of the words you are saying and onto a vision of what is actually happening may facilitate your understanding, and thus solidify your knowledge. Words with no pictures in mind not only means little, yet it is harder for others than to help you improve your conception. Yet, pictures without words may be helpful. If you try to explain the picture in your mind to someone, they may be able to help formulate what you are saying with appropriate words.