A Little Bit Of Added Explaination

It is gluons that work to help, in the connection of those sub-atomic particles that come together -- in so as to form the nucleons of an atom.  Gluons are one genus of a sub-atomic particle -- that acts as the eigenstates of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure.  There are other genre of sub-atomic particles, that work to help connect other sub-atomic particles -- in so as to help to form other particles, besides those particles that work to form the nuclei of an atom, in general.  For instance, there is a different genus of a multiplicit eigenstate of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure -- that works in so as to bind the three leptons together, that are needed in so as to work to help form an electron.  The main difference that exists in-between a gluon (that helps to bind quarks with leptons) and the genus of a sub-atomic particle that helps to bind three leptons together -- in so as to work to form an electron -- is  that the torsioining of a gluon, in so as to work to help to make the charges that are directly associated with the nucleons (a positive charge for a proton, and a neutral charge for a neutron), act in a Fourier-based manner -- in such a way, to where this so-eluded-to activity works to bear individually taken whole spins, over time.  Whereas, the torsioning of that multiplicit genus of a particle -- that works to help to make the charge of an electron, acts in a Fourier-based manner -- in such a way, to where this so-eluded-to activity works to bear individually taken fractional spins.  Bosons work to bear a whole spin, while fermions work to bear a fractional spin.  Likewise, that genus, in general, of an eigenstate of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure -- that acts in so as to pull together those sub-atomic particles that work to make the composition of a boson -- works to bear torsional eigenindices, that have an integer-based spin.  Thurthermore, that genus, in general, of an eigenstate of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure -- that acts, in so as to pull together those sub-atomic particles that work to make the composition of a fermion -- works to bear torsional eigenindices that have a fractional-based spin.  This is the general case of two different genre of eigenstates -- that are, in general, of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

A Litte Bit As To Valence Stability

As everyone knows, if an atom has six protons in the region of its nucleus -- as well as the said atom having six electrons surrounding the region of its nucleus, then, the said atom, in and of itself, may be described of as a charge-wise stable particle.   This would then mean that the six positively charged protons of such a so-stated atom will be complemented by the six negatively charged electrons of the said atom, that is at hand.  So, the overall electron voltage of the overall positive charge of the atom -- of which is relatively centered From the nucleus of the said atom Towards its exterior -- will here be countered by the overall electron voltage of the negative charge of the atom, to where this said countering of negative charge is taken From the exterior Towards the interior of the nucleus of the so-stated atom of such a given case.  This would here work to attain the condition in this case, of the state of a stable atom -- that would here tend to bear no spontaneous valence charge at all, unless there is an overt force that acts upon the said atom -- in so as to form a static charge.  So, there will tend to be in this case, at the Ward-Neumman bounds of the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based region that is interior to the region that lays from within the physical bounds of the spot, where the atom of such a given arbitrary case is at -- :one Njenhuis-based positive charge for every Real Reimmanian-based positive charge, stemming in a manner that is both orthogonal to the respective given arbitrary Real Reimmanian plane of such a case, as well as being orthogonal to the directoral-based wave-tug/wave-pull of the overall angular momentum J(S+L) of the topological sway of the so-eluded-to individually taken positive-based charges, that are extended from and propagated from the so-stated protons of such an atom; and, there will also be, one Njenhuis-based negative charge for every Real Reimmanian-based negative charge, stemming in a manner that is both orthogonal to the respective given arbitrary Real Reimmanian plane of such a case, as well as being orthogonal to the directoral-based wave-tug/wave-pull of the overall angular momentum J(S+L) of the topological sway of the so-eluded-to individually taken negative charges, that are extended from and propagated from the so-stated electrons of such an atom.  This arrangement of the charges that are incorporated from within what would here tend to be a perfectly charge-wise stable atom, tend to be pulled into the interior bounds of the said respective atom.  What I mean by the Ward-Neumman bounds of the atom, are the physical bounds of the respective atom that is being discussed -- in and of itself.  What I mean by the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based region of the atom, in this case, is this:  whether or not the atom is moving transversally as a whole, and/or, whether or not the said atom is existing from within something that is moving transversally as a whole, as well, we are still working here to consider the activity of the atom, as a physical entity that is being considered in this case as being in a relatively transversal-based motionless mode -- as a holonomic substrate that would then be here considered over the course of a relatively respective given arbitrary Laplacian-based transform -- in order to consider those mappable tracings, that would then elude-to the determination of what I have discussed here.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.