In Reference To Holomorphic Direction

Let us initially consider a superstring of discrete energy permittivity. Let us now say, that such a said string is to be facing -- in a Laplacian-related manner, towards the relative forward-holomorphic direction. Let's say that one is then to theoretically consider a Laplacian-related pivoting of the mentioned string, as a whole entity, by 90 overall degrees into the forward-holomorphic direction, to where the said string of such a given arbitrary case, is now to be facing, what was initially to be in its relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic direction. (One is here to consider the relative "bottom" of the said string, to be at a fixed general locus.) Next; let's say that one were, instead, to consider a Laplacian-related pivoting of the said string, as a whole entity, by 45 overall degrees into the relative forward-holomorphic direction, from its initially stated positioning mentioned at the start of the given arbitrary scenario of this post. Let's say here, that the Initially inferred Holomorphic direction of this said given arbitrary superstring, is to be taken as to be of the general "i" direction. Consequently; once that the said string has been determined to have a Laplacian-related pivoting, as a whole, by 45 overall degrees, into the forward-holomorphic direction from its initial positioning, -- instead of the Norm-To-Holomorphic positioning of such a string to be facing in the relative (i-1) direction, -- instead, at this point in re-arrangement, the norm-to-holomorphic positioning of such a string, is now to be facing in the relative (((i-3)*(2^.5))/2) direction.  Consequently; at this point in consideration, the Reverse-Norm-To-Holomorphic positioning of such a string, is now to be facing in the relative (((3-i)*(2^.5))/2) direction (instead of it facing in its initially existent (1-i) direction.)  I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Immediately Adjacent Discrete Quanta Of Energy

Immediately adjacent discrete quanta of energy that are of the same universe, work to bear a covariant wobble relative to one another -- that is to bear both an orthogonal tense of wave-tug, as well as being directed at a relative Poincare-related angle of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees (~1.104735878*10^(-81) degrees back-and-forth.)
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Five Alephs Of Infinity -- From The Smallest To The Biggest

Here are what I understand to be the five Alephs of Infinity, from the smallest to the biggest.
These are thence the five general categories of "relative infinity," as I am able to presently perceive, from the smallest general category to the largest general category.

1)  Infinity.

2)  ((3.977746573*10^10)*Infinity)^8.

3)  ((3.977746573*10^10))^Infinity^8.

4)  (Infinity^8^Infinity^8).

5)  (e^Infinity^8^Infinity^8).

Here is part of my derivation, as to the immediately prior:

The hyperbolic tangent of 45 degrees is Infinity.  Both the sine of 45 degrees and the cosine of 45 degrees is equal to (1/(2^.5)).
sine(45 degrees)*cosine(45 degrees) =  (1/2^.5)*(1/2^.5) = 1/2.  (1/2)^5 = 1/32.
Let's say that (180 degrees/PI)/32  = x degrees.
Let's next say that (The hyperbolic tangent of (x degrees)) = y.
Let's say that y^8 = z.
Then, (33*z)^8 = ~ 3.977746573*10^10.

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Metric-Gauge-Related Pulsation

Here is an idea -- as to what the mathematical formula is, as to how one is to work to determine what the metric-gauge-related pulsation is to be -- between any two respective given arbitrary orbifold eigensets:

(3.026*10^(-32))(kilograms*meters^3/seconds^2))*
(1/(e^(del of the Ricci Flow))(seconds^2/meters^2)*
(Angle Subtended Between The Two distinct respective given arbitrary orbifold eigensets -- as to here to be taken in a consistent manner)(< in degrees)*
(The Duration Of The Respective Given Arbitrary Yukawa Coupling -- In Which Such A Said Respective Given Arbitrary Metric-Gauge-Related Pulsation Is Here To Occur)(Seconds)

This is then to arise, to give units of Kilograms*Meters*Degrees*Seconds, --
In so as to work to provide a tense of a consideration of metric-gauge-related (Kg*Degrees),
Pulsation (Meters*Seconds).

This is in an effort to move in the direction of the Grand  Unified Field Theory.

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Adjacent Superstring Wobble Versus Adjacent Light-Cone-Gaug Wobble

Take the covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling, that is here to exist between any two given arbitrary immediately adjacent superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  Whatever this so-eluded-to covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling is -- multiply it by i (the square-root of -1), and one will then get what the covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling will be, between the two directly corresponding first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates -- that are here to act in so as to work to make-up the primarily wave-based functioning of the discrete energy impedance, that is to be directly corresponding to the correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- that are of such a respective given arbitrary case scenario.  So, if two immediately adjacent superstrings are subtended from each other, with a covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling of (10i)degrees -- as just an arbitrary example, and this would then certainly mean that these two said superstrings will tend to be of two different universal settings -- then, those first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that are here to work to make up the two comparative said respective discrete quanta of energy -- will then be in so as to work to bear a covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling of (-10) degrees.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.