Conservation Of Higgs Field Density Eigenstates

 The mass-related density of the multiplicity of Higgs Boson eigenstates, is abnormally large. This works to help make the correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode that these work to express, abnormally great. In so long as such Higgs Boson eigenstates are not abruptly brought into perturbation, the directly associated attributable conservation of Higgs Field density eigenstates, works to prevent the facilitation of the formation of unwanted black holes. SAM. 

Initial Propagation

 The initial set of Higgs Boson eigenstates, that came into existence right after the Big-Bang happened, worked to create discrete energy, which was based upon the interdependent interaction of a correlative set of gauge-metric-related eigenstates, in what managed to be directly associated with two main physical attributes of expansion. These two expansion-related characteristics, were: 1) Discrete energy that was based upon the reductional flow of a Euclidean expansion; And — 2) Discrete energy that was based upon the reductional flow of a Clifford expansion. The inferred Euclidean flow, primarily worked to form superstrings of discrete energy permittivity; Whereas —The inferred Clifford flow, primarily worked to form gauge-bosons. Superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, work to form actual energy; Whereas, propagated vibrations that are “indirectly” formed by the interactions of gauge-bosons, eminently work to transfer the reductional forces of physical nature.  TO BE CONTINUED! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach. (1989).

Time -- The Light-Cone-Gauge -- The Higgs Boson -- Superstrings -- Gauge-Bosons

 When the Logos (the intelligent design that created the multiverse) struck the core of the "Big-Bang," this worked to initially create time. Soon after time was created, the multiplicity of the restraining force of the multiverse (the "light-cone-gauge), vibrated immensely, in so as to work to form, what I term of as being, the "isoelliptiabelianoid." (Of which is what I term of, as being the original tense of the "Higgs Boson.") It is the initial action of the original Higgs Boson genus, that worked to form the initially created superstrings. (And superstrings, as you well know, are those tiny phenomenology, that operate to form the multiplicity of the discrete energy of the multiverse.) Around the time that such superstrings were created, the presence of what may be termed of as being, "gauge-boson eigenstates," came into the forefront of the Rarita Structure. Once the presence of gauge-boson eigenstates was established, such inferred gauge-bosons, were then "incited" to bear the general tendency, of acting, in so as to "pluck" those individually taken second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that were here to work to comprise the first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that were each to be directly affiliated with the proximal local presence of each discrete increment of physical energy impedance, in so as to work to complete the general structural course of the Rarita Structure. Once the general structural course of the Rarita Structure was formed, it was then established, that the relative starting source of the Rarita Structure, was the presence of the multiplicity of the general loci of light-cone-gauge eigenstates; whereas, -- the relative finishing source of the Rarita Structure, was the presence of the multiplicity of the general loci of the gauge-boson eigenstates. It is the gauge-boson eigenstates (the E(6)XE(6) strings, of which are here to act, as the multiplicity of a general genus of a heterotic string), as these are here to act in so as to pluck (like a harp) their directly corresponding second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that acted to add an additional 6 spatial dimensions to the maximum number of spatial dimensions, to each individually taken set of parallel universes, in so as to work to make each of these three of such said individually taken sets of universes, to instead of having a maximum potential of having 26 spatial dimensions plus time (a maxed-out holographic space), into instead, having a maximum potential of having 32 spatial dimensions plus time (a maxed-out Hilbert space). This is part of why I perceive, that the multiverse is not purely acting as a cohesive set of three "hologram"-like entities. I WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SUSPENSE LATER! TO BE CONTINUED! SAM.

Higgs Boson Eigenstate — Anti-Holomorphic Kahler Conditions

 The general effect of the multiplicity of the Higgs Boson eigenstate, tends to be delineated to those given arbitrary regions, all over space-time-fabric, — at which anti-holomorphic Kahler conditions are to be initiated. I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (1989).

Center-State Between The Thought Force And The Gravitational Force

 Whenever the center-state of the interdependent interaction, that is here to occur between an increment of the thought force With a correlative increment of the gravitational force (as this is here to be taken, as an interdependent interaction, that is here to occur between a set of one or more thought waves With a correlative set of one or more gravitational waves), to where this is to alter in its delineation, -- this will consequently tend to work to form a tense of a re-positioning of the directly corresponding Higgs Action (as this is here to be taken, in the form of a re-positioning of one or more Higgs Boson eigenstates.) Sincerely, SAM ROACH.(1989).

Reiterating Why I Feel CERN Should Be Cautious

Discrete charge is About 1.6*10^(-19) of one coulumb.
The Leverage of the Fischler-Suskind Mechanism, upon the multiplicit holonomic substrate of the (multiplicit) Klein Bottle -- in so as to work to move the multiplicit Higgs Boson eigenstate into its main function, is on the order of About 6.25*10^(18).
The number "1.6*10^(-19)" is the reciprocal of the number "6.25*10^(18)."
Based on this general type of a consideration, -- isolating an eigenstate of the Higgs Boson , may potentially work to undue, at least a small degree of discrete charge -- in an unwarranted manner, to where this may potentially cause an unwanted fissure in space and time, -- to where this could possibly work to form a black-hole.  Black-Holes Should Not Be Harnessed.  These work to fray substringular phenomenology, of which is then to be subsequently "spit-out" at a different general locus as anti matter -- of which is then to subsequently to go into the process of re-organizing into matter.  This is why those general activities of CERN, -- in which such a process of doing such things like "isolating the Higgs Boson," should be refrained from, if you are able to "see what I mean."
"NOUS SOMMES ICI!"

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Phenomenology And Lagrangian-Based Paths

The multiplicit transference of discrete quanta of electromagnetic energy, tends to conform to a unitary Lagrangian-based path.
The multiplicit transference of discrete quanta of kinetic energy, tends to conform to a binary Lagrangian-based path.
The multiplicit transference of those discrete quanta of mass-bearing energy, that we would tend to normally think of -- such as, for example, the mass-bearing discrete quanta of energy, that are known of as quarks, -- tends to conform to a tertiary Lagrangian-based path.
However -- the multiplicit transference of Higgs Boson eigenstates, tends to conform to a quaternionic Lagrangian-based path.
It is the primeval existence of Higgs Boson eigenstates, that worked to form -- what we tend to think of now, as being the initially existent superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.
I will continue with the suspsense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Gaussian Transformations And Consecutive Kahler-Metric States

At the metrical end of one given arbitrary iteration of one respective Kahler-Metric eigenmetric -- the directly corresponding holonomic substrate-based eigenstate of the Klein Bottle, when along with its correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate, -- is to work to re-orientate by readjustment, by the metrical activity of three consecutive iterations of group-related instanton, in so as to be ready to act upon what is here to be a different Ward-Caucy-based topological substrate -- in so as to operate via the Kahler-Metric upon a different set of discrete energy quanta, that are to then undergo another eigenmetric of the Kahler-Metric.  This would then work to allow for the respective holonomic substate-based phenomenology of the said metric, to act in so as to work to help in another set of discrete quanta of energy to work to reattain their respective given arbitrary discrete energy, -- so that such discrete energy may both exist and persist.  Right after such a so-stated readjustment, -- that respective holonomic substrate-based phenomenology, that had just acted upon one set of discrete energy phenomenology -- is to then work upon another set of discrete energy phenomenology.  Such an ensuing set of phenomenology that is to be worked upon next, is not necessarily of the same universal setting as the respective given arbitrary initial set of discrete energy quanta-based phenomenology that had just been worked upon.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To The Gravity And The Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism

The more tightly-knit that the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode is, of the proximal localized Kahler-Metric eigenstates -- that are Yukawa to the directly associated discrete energy quanta, that are Gliosis to the directly corresponding Klein Bottle eigenstates, that are pushed invertly via the Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism -- by the directly corresponding Higgs Boson eigenstates (that are shaped like what may here be termed of as "isoelliptabelianoid" eigenstates), -- the more that such a said proximal locus is to then here, to be associated with the directly corresponding Rarita Structure eigenstates.  This would then work to make such a so-stated proximal locus to then bear a higher scalar amplitude of gravity.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Higgs Boson And The Klein Bottle

The general genus of activity, that is most directly related to the Fourier-based differentiation of the multiplicit Higgs Boson -- by which the multiplicit holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle is to here be translated, in so as to work to allow for the group-related activity of the Kahler-Metric -- is a major influence, as to what works to help in the perpetuation and in the continuation of homotopy.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part One Of Session 2 Of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds And Calabi Interactions

The Fujikawa Coupling is central, not only to that activity that is related to the formation of two-dimensional superstrings of discrete eletromagnetic energy permittivity -- that are known of as photons -- From the Fourier-based activity of one-dimensional superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity, that has to have here just dropped an energy level from within the Ward-Caucy bounds of a respective given arbitrary atom -- yet, it is also quintessential to the Fourier-based translation of having to work to help in the process of causing one respective individually taken fully Lorentz-Four-Contracted one-dimensional open-strand of plain kinetic energy permittivity, to be able to thenceforth work to help in the formation of a fully contracted closed-loop two-dimensional superstring that is of a discrete bosonic-based nature.  The Fujikawa Coupling is what had initially worked to form the light-like energy, from those initial open-strands of individually taken eigenstates that were of the correlative disturbances of space, that had been just struck by whatever worked to form the Big-Bang -- by the resultant of that discombobulation that had happened right after the core of the Big-Bang was struck, in so as to work to form the initial energy that had subsequently worked to form the multiverse, this of which had to have happened -- soon after the initial Higgs Boson eigenstate or the Isoelliptiabelianoid, had worked to form the initial set of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The 14th Test Solution To The Last Test Of Course 19

14)  The initial Fourier-based activity that I am to describe of, as to the Klein Bottle eigenstate -- is of appertaining to the holonomic substrate of a said individually taken Klein Bottle eigenstate.  As a respective given arbitrary Higgs Boson eigenstate is working to help move the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate, into the norm-to-holomorphic direction at the start of the Kahler-Metric, the so-stated Higgs Boson eigenstate is situated at the relative center of the  norm-to-holomorphic end of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate -- as such a so-eluded-to Fourier-based activity is in the process of moving the said Klein Bottle eigenstate, into the relative range of the Real Reimmanian Plane that is here to be directly associated with the Fourier-based activity of those correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittiivty, that are, as eigenindices of the correlative one or more orbifold eigensets that are to here be directly associated, to undergo the so-stated Kahler-Metric.  Once the said Klein Bottle eigenstate has reached the so-stated relative tense of the here local Real Reimmanian Plane, the correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate is to then angle at 22.5 degrees -- in such a manner that is here to be subtended between the relative holomorphic and the relative norm-to-holomorphic direction, by which the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is to ensue upon moving into.  Later on, as the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is to then be moving back into the relative reverse-holomorphic direction, the correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate is to then angle at 22.5 degrees -- in such a manner that is here to be subtended subtended between the relative reverse holomorphic and the relative norm-to-holomrphic direction, by which the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is to ensue upon moving into.  Once that the said Klein Bottle eigenstate has re-reached the initial spot as to the locus of where it had started to move upon the respective relative Real Reimmanian Plane, by which it had started to bear its Gliosis-based relationship to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- that were to enter into its Ward-Neumman bounds, in-between the individually taken increments of the here successive correlative iterations of BRST and the Regge Action eigenstates -- the correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate is to then be translated into bearing in the relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic direction, as this so-stated Higgs Boson eigenstate is to now be located, in a Laplacian-based manner, at the relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic positioning of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate. The 382nd to the 384th iterations of the correlative Kahler-Metric eigenmetric, work to reposition the Klein Bottle eigenstate, in such a manner by which it may strategically enter its ensuing eigenmetric of the Kahler-Metric.  This general format of activity, works to map-out a cohomological mappable tracing of a relatively deep bag-like bottle, that bears a handle that may be mapped-out at 22.5 degrees in the relative (-ihat, +zhat) direction, as the Klein Bottle is entering the Real Reimmanian Plane of the Kahler-Metric.  And as the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate is to act in so as to leave this relative Real Reimmanian Plane, this will work to map-out a cohomological mappable tracing of a relatively deep bag-like bottle, that bears a handle that may now be mapped-out at 22.5 degrees in the relative (+ihat, -zhat) direction.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Solution To The Second Question Of The Last Test Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

2)  The general flow of the Kahler-Metric, is as follows:  The holonomic substrate of an eigenstate of the Klein Bottle, is moved by the leveraging of the Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism -- in so as to be tugged by an eigenstate of the Higgs Boson, into the general relative forward-norm-to-holomorphic direction, until the said eigenstate of the Klein Bottle is to reach that given arbitrary Real-Reimmanian-based plane -- by which it is to interact with discrete energy quanta, in a Gliosis-based manner.  Once that the said eigenstate of the Klein Bottle has then reached the just mentioned plane, it is to then be translated per each successive iteration of group-related instanton -- as it is then moving in the relative forward-holomorphic direction, as the so-stated respective given arbitrary discrete energy quanta "tags along," by interacting with the so-eluded-to Schotky Construction-based compilation, as it is being translated to the relative "left."  After 96 consecutive iterations of group-instanton, that is of the so-eluded-to process of the said discrete energy quanta to here be interacting with the said eigenstate of the holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle, the just mentioned Klein Bottle eigenstate is to then be re-translated back into the relative reverse-holomorphic direction, -- by the activity that is to here be involved with 95 ensuing consecutive iterations of group-related instantons.  (No locus of the iteration of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate is to here be repeated in this so-eluded-to group-metric.)  As the said reverse-holomorphic activity of the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is then being translated back by 95 interactions of group-instanton, the correlative discrete energy quanta act in so as to again "tag along."  After this so-eluded-to Gliosis-based process, that is of the interaction of discrete energy quanta -- inter-mingling with the respective eigenstate of the holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle, is to then happen, the just stated eigenstate is to then be translated in the relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic direction -- to where this will then here work to cause the said eigenstate of the holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle to be moved out of the Real Reimmanian plane, that had acted as the Yukawa-based Hamiltonian operand of the so-written Kahler-Metric-affiliated tense, that is of the correlative Fourier-related activity.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Three Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

The condition that any mini-stringular Laplacian-based networking -- of what may be termed of as the mappable tracing of zero-norm-state-projections, often works to form a general condition of a Njenhuis state of substringular tension -- that is to be delineated here among the holonomic substrate of that mini-stringular segmentation, by which the Fourier-based activity of the so-stated Njenhuis tensors are to here be interactive upon certain other respective given arbitrary indices of the field-density of that homotopic residue, -- that is to here be external to the core-field-density of certain given arbitrary superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are to here be of a Yukawa-based nature, in a covariant manner, to the general tense of the interdependent Ward-Caucy-based conditions of the so-stated holonomic substrate of the extostential field divergence, that is of the said given arbitrary state of the so-stated zero-norm-projections of such a respective case, -- may often work upon the holonomic substrate of the directly corresponding superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that I have eluded--to in this said general codeterminable and codifferentiable sub-Fourier-based Ward-Caucy state, of what is to here be one relatively transient kinematic inter-relation of mini-stringular segementation with discrete energy, to come into the spontaneous need for the implementation of the interaction of the proximal local holonomic substrate of a respective given Higgs Boson to be brought into the so-eluded-to local substringular neighborhood, in so as to bring the Gliosis-based implementation of the Kahler-Metric upon the core-field-density of those substringular eigenmembers of which are to here be brought into what is here to be the Gliosis-based interaction of the directly associated quanta of discrete energy with the proximal localized Klein Bottle eigenstate, that is to here be brought into the said local substringular arena, in so as to bring into play those superstringular changes that are needed -- in order for there to be both the continuation and the perpetual interaction of certain discrete energy quanta among other discrete energy quanta, -- in order for energy to both persist and exist.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some Additional Information As To Centralized Knotting

Orbifold eigensets that are of a relatively stable atom, as well as the physical phenomenology of those orbifolds that act as Higgs Boson eigenstates -- have a mass that is proportional to the scalar amplitude of the Hodge-based magnitude of their directly corresponding degree of their centralized knotting, in space and time. So, let us consider the mass of an electron versus the mass of a proton -- that is of an atom that is of a relatively stable Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, over a discrete group-related metric, at the subatomic level.  A proton has About 1836 times the mass of an electron, in such a so-stated setting.  This would then mean that such a proton would here work to bear about 1836 times as much of a scalar magnitude of a tense of a centralized knotting, than an electron.  Of course, an electron does not bear a condition of having gluons to put together the three leptons -- that work to bring together the existence of each individually taken electron.  Yet, the physical integration of subatomic mers -- in so as to work to form any key ingredient of an atom -- does indeed work to involve the Ward-Caucy-based condition, of what would here amount to be the existence of what I term of here as an eigenstate of a centralized knotting.  Its just that those individually taken subatomic particles that would work here in so as to help at the formation of putting together the so-stated respective "mers," in so as to make the so-eluded-to "ingredients" of an electron, are a particle that is not technically a gluon.  So, any given arbitrary Higgs Boson eigenstate -- of which works to bear a mass that is 126 times the mass of a proton -- will then work to bear a tense of a scalar magnitude of a centralized knotting, that is of a Hodge-Index that involves an amplitude of 126 times as much of such a said manner of a condition of the so-stated centralized knotting, over any directly corresponding eigenmetric of an equally covariant sequential series of group-related instantons.  So, not only is any phenomenology that is of a certain covariant, codeterminable, and a codifferentiable manner -- to be of a certain behavior, in so as to work to bear a specific magnitude of a quantum of a given arbitrary multiple of having more of an amplitude of tending to have more mass, to be of a Ward-Caucy tense of conditions, in so as to work to tend to bear a proportional multiple of a gravitational-based push and pull over time -- yet, such a physical phenomenology will also tend to bear the same proportionality of a tense of a centralized knotting, over the same covariant group-related eigenmetric.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach

As To The Perturbation Of An Initially Conformally Invariant Setting

An orbifold eigenset -- that would here consist of both two orbifolds that act as two different individually taken entities of the holonomic substrate of a quark, as well as also consisting of one other individually taken entity that acts as the holonomic substrate of a lepton -- bears a proximal local gluonic force, that would here work to bind the two said quarks to the said lepton, in so as to help to form the construction of a proton.  The gluonic force -- that works in the process of working to piece together the so-stated proton -- is here an eigenstate of the activity of the strong force.  The genus of the multiplicit gluon-related force --  works to bear its directly corresponding Fourier-based transformation, as a Hamiltonian operation that is localized at the multivarious centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure.  When the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode of a proton is altered by a reversal in the holomorphicity of the topological sway of the said orbifold eigenset -- that acts as the compositional-based construction of a proton -- the so-eluded-to multiplicit Hamiltonian operator is thereby reversed in the covariant-based path that it had initially had, when it was in a state of conformal invariance in its initial said Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode.  This said reversal in the directoral-based topological sway of what is here the tensoric Ward-Caucy-based Lagrangian path of the so-stated proton, will then here be in the process of tending to form an antiholomorphic Kahler condition.  This said antiholomorphic Kahler condition, will then act as a group-metrical Hamiltonian operation -- that will here tend to trigger a Wick Action eigenstate.  This Wick Action eigenstate then tends to trigger the Landau-Gisner-Action, in so as to operate the Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism -- in so as to work to operate with  the directly correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate, in so as to move the correlative multiplicit Klein Bottle eigenstate -- in so as to help to work at allowing for a needed eigenmetric of the Kahler-Metric.

The Main Genus Of Centralized Knotting

The multiplicit Higgs Boson eigenstate bears a mass that is about 126 times that of a proton.  The mass-bearing core-field-density of a Higgs Boson eigenstate is much higher than the mass-bearing core-field-density of a proton.  This works to cause the condition -- that, a Higgs Boson eigenstate has much more of a tense of a centralized knotting than the physical state of a proton, when both the multiplicit Higgs Boson eigenstate and the multiplicit proton are to be compared at their multivarious-based respective given arbitrary Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based settings.  This is due to the condition, that, the Higgs Boson is that tense or genus of holonomic substrate -- that is utilized in so as to work to move the Klein Bottle -- in so as to bring the correlative respective Kahler-Metric into the general region of superstrings, in so as to work to allow for discrete energy to re-attain their fractals of the said discrete energy quanta, in order that discrete energy may be able to both persist and continue to exist, over time.  It is then eminent, that the multiplicit Klein Bottle eigenstates are to remain tied, in a homotopic manner, to their respective correlative Higgs Boson-based eigenstates -- in so long as the directly corresponding substringular phenomenology is to remain unfrayed.  This is because, even though a proton may often undergo the weak force -- which is the radioactive decay of an atom, it is still pervasive, that, in order for any respective given arbitrary Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based region to be able to both persist and continue to exist over any given respective successive series of iterations of group-related instantons -- that that particular genus of activity, that must be needed in order for discrete energy to keep re-attaining those fractals of discrete energy quanta, that are needed in order for energy to not fade-out of being actual energy -- must be able to continue to be able to happen, even if any of such respective Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based regions are to undergo the so-stated radioactive decay in a spontaneous-based manner.  Such a needed venue for a necessary additional Hodge-Index of homotopic residue, will then tend to work to require an additional Hodge-Index of what may be termed of as eigenstates of a centralized knotting.  The more of a Laplacian-based condition that is to exist, as a state or a genus of an additional centralized knotting, is likewise going to tend to work to be indicated by a Laplacian-based condition of such a proximal locus -- that works to bear a higher scalar magnitude of mass-bearing states.  The higher the mass that is to exist in a relatively confined region -- the more of a centralized knotting that is to then exist in the so-eluded-to Ward-Neumman-based region, in which such a higher mass is to kinematically exist at, over time.  Or, another way of looking at it -- the more of a Hodge-Index of centralized knotting that there is needed to exist per density of as to where such a so-stated additional scalar magnitude of inter-webbed mini-stringular segmentation is to exist in, in order for the proximal local space-time-fabric to not be frayed -- the higher that the mass will be, that is most directly involved with the correlative eigenstates of the said proximal local region in which such an additional tightness of inter-twined mini-stringular fabric is to be Poincaire at, to where then, the higher that the density of the membranes of homotopic residue that will then exist at the so-stated respective given arbitrary set locus of Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based mode will then tend to be.  I will continue with the suspense later!
To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Adjacent Flowing Orbifolds

Let us say that one is to here consider two different orbifold eigensets, that are initially moving in two different individually taken directions -- the first respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset is here to be moving in the opposite general direction as the second respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of this so-stated given arbitrary case scenario.  Let us now say that the first so-stated orbifold eigenset works to bear either a magnetic attraction or a fractal of a magnetic attraction to the second so-stated orbifold eigenset of this respective case.  Let us now say that the said magnetic attraction that is here to bear upon the second so-stated given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of this respective case -- from the first so-stated given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of this respective case, is of great enough of a scalar magnitude -- to where the initial Lagrangian-based condition as to that the two said respective individually taken orbifold eigensets are to here begin as moving in two different and opposite general directions, is to perturbate to where the said physical magnetic attraction is to then cause the two different respective orbifold eigensets to result into a Ward-Caucy condition as to then being brought into a state of moving in the same general directional-based flow, over enough of a transient period of time in which the so-eluded-to magnetic attraction that is formed between the two said eigensets is able to cause such a general genus of directoral-based alteration -- by a means of what would here be the result of some arbitrary Noether-based consideration, through the activity of a Fourier Transformation that would here involve a discrete number of iterations of group-related instantons.  Once the two so-stated orbifold eigensets of such a given arbitrary case are to then be moving in the same general directoral-based flow, then, one may say that both of the said orbifold eigensets would be going in what would soon ensue as to be one resultant generally-based holomorphic-based flow of the kinematic-based activity -- of two different sets of superstrings that would here be both operating in so as to perform two different individually taken functions, over time.  Basically right after the two different individually taken orbifold eigensets are to then be moving in the same tense of a holomorphic-based flow, then, the second said eigenset would have then switched in its general eigenbase of directoral-based holomorphism.  Remember that when a superstring or a set of superstrings that operate in so as to perform a specific substringular function -- is to switch from one discrete tense of a holomorphic-based flow to the oppositely projected discrete tense of a holomorphic-based flow in its general projection -- that this condition works to form what may be here described of as an antiholomorphic Kahler condition.  An antiholomorphic Kahler condition works to initiate what may be termed of as the Fourier-based activity of what may be termed of as a Wick Action eigenstate. The multiplicit Wick Action eigenstate acts upon the multiplicit Landau-Gisner Action egienstate -- in so as to act upon the multiplicit Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism, in so as to move the multiplicit Klein Bottle eigenstate, via the multiplicit Higgs Boson eigenstate, in so as to cause the Ward-Caucy conditionality of the activity of what may be termed of as the multiplicit Kahler-Metric, over what would here be a spontaneously brought-about succession -- that would here be over a relatively transient period of time.  This activity of the Kahler-Metric will tend to bring about the activity of a Gaussian Transformation -- in so as to work to cause the spontaneous perpetuity of optimum substringular spatial freedom, & in so as to help to bring about the re-attainment of those fractals of discrete energy, that are needed to be re-attained in so as to help discrete energy to still exist as discrete energy over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!
Sam Roach.

A Little As To The Relationship Of The Higgs Field To Photons

Most superstrings of discrete energy permittivity and their directly corresponding counterparts -- in conjunction with their correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates of discrete energy impedance and their correlative light-cone-gauge eigenstates -- in order to remain as discrete energy, must routinely undergo the Kaeler-Metric, via the correlative activity of the guidance of the directly corresponding Higgs Boson eigenstates --these of which move the directly corresponding Klein Bottle eigenstates, in so as to allow for the here needed correlative Gaussian Transformations, that work to allow substringular spaces to both persist and exist, over time.  This works to mean, that most superstrings of discrete energy are routinely put through the immediate influence of what is termed of as the Higgs Field.  The exception is photons.  Photons both have no mass, as well as the condition that photons are comprised of what would otherwise be completely Lorentz-Four-Contracted superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  This Ward-Caucy-based condition works to allow for photons -- that are Not being lagged-down by Calabi-based interactions, to just slide-out of the so-stated immediate influence of the genus of that Yukawa Coupling, that is known of as the said Higgs Field.  Yet, during the first 384 directly corresponding group-related instantons that happen -- right after any given arbitrary respective photon has struck another superstring of discrete energy permittivity in a Gliosis-based manner -- since this works to form discrete increments of entropy -- this will be the only exception as to a photon, instead, being directly influenced by the Yukawa-based pull of the Higgs Field.  This exception that I have just stated here, is when even a photon, that is normally not directly tugged by the Higgs Field, will be put into a situation -- in which it needs to re-attain its discrete fractals of energy -- in order to both persist and thereby exist as energy.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.

Some More as to the Big-Bang

Once the Logos struck the core of the Big-Bang, in 96 pairs of two different spatial directions -- as an equal and opposite reaction, and from the opposite general genus of directionality -- the general contents, that had worked to comprise the said core of the Big-Bang, were pulled from the initial state of implosion -- into a tense of an outward moving expansion, that then worked to form the initial basis of the substringular, in the process of the formation of what we now term of as the multiverse.  (From a dot-product of the Logos coming upon the said core of the Big-Bang, to a cross-product of the said core of the Big-Bang being pulled outward, as an equal and opposite response.)  Each so-mentioned pair of directions, of which had initially worked to strike the said core of the Big-Bang, worked to form what we may consider to be what is now the 96 spatial parameters of dimensionality of overall space-time-fabric -- that had come together in so as to work to form the overall Li-based Gaussian symmetry of the said space-time-fabric. These so-stated dimensional parameters happened in pairs, on account of the condition, that every spatial dimension, as an ansantz, bears at least two general bases of direction (a holomorphic or left-moving direction, and, an antiholomorphic or right-moving direction), in order to make physical sense.  This also works to show the condition, that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, happening in the opposite general direction.  The force of the initial strike of the Logos upon the core of the Big-Bang, is what had worked upon the tiny point particles that had initially comprised the shells and the center of the so-stated core of the Big-Bang -- in such a manner in so as to form the isoelliptabelianoid (the initial Higgs Boson eigenstate), of which had then worked to form the initial superstrings of space-time-fabric.  Once superstrings were formed, these had then worked to form the multivarious array of the phenomenology of physical space and time, over the succession of the flow of many sequential group-related instantons -- in so as to work to eventually form the physical world in which we live in today.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.