Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Adjacent Flowing Orbifolds

Let us say that one is to here consider two different orbifold eigensets, that are initially moving in two different individually taken directions -- the first respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset is here to be moving in the opposite general direction as the second respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of this so-stated given arbitrary case scenario.  Let us now say that the first so-stated orbifold eigenset works to bear either a magnetic attraction or a fractal of a magnetic attraction to the second so-stated orbifold eigenset of this respective case.  Let us now say that the said magnetic attraction that is here to bear upon the second so-stated given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of this respective case -- from the first so-stated given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of this respective case, is of great enough of a scalar magnitude -- to where the initial Lagrangian-based condition as to that the two said respective individually taken orbifold eigensets are to here begin as moving in two different and opposite general directions, is to perturbate to where the said physical magnetic attraction is to then cause the two different respective orbifold eigensets to result into a Ward-Caucy condition as to then being brought into a state of moving in the same general directional-based flow, over enough of a transient period of time in which the so-eluded-to magnetic attraction that is formed between the two said eigensets is able to cause such a general genus of directoral-based alteration -- by a means of what would here be the result of some arbitrary Noether-based consideration, through the activity of a Fourier Transformation that would here involve a discrete number of iterations of group-related instantons.  Once the two so-stated orbifold eigensets of such a given arbitrary case are to then be moving in the same general directoral-based flow, then, one may say that both of the said orbifold eigensets would be going in what would soon ensue as to be one resultant generally-based holomorphic-based flow of the kinematic-based activity -- of two different sets of superstrings that would here be both operating in so as to perform two different individually taken functions, over time.  Basically right after the two different individually taken orbifold eigensets are to then be moving in the same tense of a holomorphic-based flow, then, the second said eigenset would have then switched in its general eigenbase of directoral-based holomorphism.  Remember that when a superstring or a set of superstrings that operate in so as to perform a specific substringular function -- is to switch from one discrete tense of a holomorphic-based flow to the oppositely projected discrete tense of a holomorphic-based flow in its general projection -- that this condition works to form what may be here described of as an antiholomorphic Kahler condition.  An antiholomorphic Kahler condition works to initiate what may be termed of as the Fourier-based activity of what may be termed of as a Wick Action eigenstate. The multiplicit Wick Action eigenstate acts upon the multiplicit Landau-Gisner Action egienstate -- in so as to act upon the multiplicit Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism, in so as to move the multiplicit Klein Bottle eigenstate, via the multiplicit Higgs Boson eigenstate, in so as to cause the Ward-Caucy conditionality of the activity of what may be termed of as the multiplicit Kahler-Metric, over what would here be a spontaneously brought-about succession -- that would here be over a relatively transient period of time.  This activity of the Kahler-Metric will tend to bring about the activity of a Gaussian Transformation -- in so as to work to cause the spontaneous perpetuity of optimum substringular spatial freedom, & in so as to help to bring about the re-attainment of those fractals of discrete energy, that are needed to be re-attained in so as to help discrete energy to still exist as discrete energy over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!
Sam Roach.

No comments: