Orthogonal Orbits

The physical condition of the orthogonal adjacent elliptical orbits of electrons -- as such said electrons are to be in the process of cycling around any one given arbitrary atom -- is influenced, by the condition of the previously implied relativistic E(8)XE(8) stringular oscillation-based tendencies.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Mass-Bearing Eigenstates And Gravity

The more that there is here to be the proximal local presence, of the eminent exhibition of mass-bearing eigenstates, -- the higher that there will then tend to be, the quantity of a proximal local Hodge-Index of eigenstates, that are of the proximal local "centalized knotting" of the Rarita Strcuture, to be locally present, from within the said proximal local region in which there is here to be a relatively high bearing of mass-bearing phenomenology. This will then tend to work to cause there, to here to be a relatively high local presence of gravity waves, from within the here to be adjutant and adjacent proximal local region -- in which there is here to be a relatively high quantum of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  This then works to tug the adjacent phenomena, in a Yukawa-related manner, upon its so-eluded-to "centralized" stringular phenomenology.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Cotangent Bundle And Polyakov Action

The greater that the Lorentz-Four-Contraction that is here to happen to an orbifold eigenset, that is here to be comprised of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- the more that there is to be a greater quantity of the respective mass-bearing strings, that are then to be existent from within the Ward-Cauchy-related bounds of the here mentioned orbifold eigenset, -- since such a said eigenset is to then to work to bear a greater quantum of mass, and mass is a form of energy, as well as the obvious and the fundamental condition that energy is comprised of by superstrings.  Yet, over the course of the same activity that is here to be directly associated with such an increase in the respective Lorentz-Four-Contraction that is of the said orbifold eigenset -- the individually taken superstrings that are here to work to comprise the said eigenset, are to then to contract as is as according to the just stated mode of a contraction, and the time that is here to be experienced by the said orbifold eigenset is to be slower than the time that would otherwise be experienced by a terrestrial observer.  Furthermore -- the greater that the Lorentz-Four-Contraction that is here to happen to a mass-bearing superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- the less mini-stringular segmentation that is then to tend to be fed into the proximal locus of the Ward-Cauchy-bounds of the so-eluded-to cotangent bundle of the said superstring of such a case, in and of itself, over a respective directly covariant eigenmetric, since the individually taken superstring that is here to be being discussed in this particular given arbitrary case, is to then to be experiencing a lower tense of a Polyakov Action egienstate.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The SETS metric

I am about to name a certain genus of a metric, that all substringular phenomenology of predominant discrete energy goes through, in-between each succeeding instanton -- over the course of the approach of the ending of each generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow.  During the said generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow -- right before the quaternionic-instanton-fied-impulse-mode, there is a brief Njenhuis metric -- in which homotopy works to re-adjust, in so that the activity that is most involved with the continued existence of Gaussian-based transformations is then able to both persist and exist, for both a spontaneous and an "enthusiastic" duration of a manner, over the ensuing set of those iterations of group-metric in so as to be able to keep happening, over time.  This is the duration that I have most directly associated with what I have termed of as the Bases of Light -- which happens, over the course of the general metric that I am eluding to right here -- as a "huddle" that happens during the "seamless" "break" that is then translated, through the ensuing activity of the said quaternionic-instanton-field-impulse-mode.  I am here coining the term:  The SETS metric, in so as to demarcate both the existence and the activity of such a so-stated duration -- as being what I have described of in my earlier writings -- in so as to officially name what I have tried to explain of, as I have briefly summarized in this said post.
What the SETS metric is an acronym for, is, the following:  Space-time-bearing
                                                                                                  Entanglement
                                                                                                    Topological
                                                                                                      Setting.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.