Proximal Local Presence Of Kahler-based Quotients

 The proximal local presence, of what works to form that general holonomic substrate, that may be mathematically described by the conceptualization of Kahler-based quotients, as this is here to be appertaining to the multiplicity of the metric-related condition of discrete energy phenomenology, helps to work to form a basis, for the existence of magnetism. I will continue with the suspense later! Sincerely, SAM ROACH.

Rate Of Conformal Field Transformation

Let's say that one were here to consider two different mass-bearing orbifold eigensets, that are about to undergo a Conformal Field Transformation.  Both of these said mass-bearing orbifold eigensets, are here to work to bear both the same relativistic mass And the same relativistic velocity, to where such a common velocity may be relatively simultaneous, via the vantage-point of a central conipoint  -- over a transient discrete increment of time, to where such a so-inferred duration may as well be described of as acting as an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  Let us next say that both of such orbifold eigensets are here to be undergoing a Conformal Field Transformation, that is here to be of the nature of their spatial dimensionality, -- by going from an initial four spatial dimensional Calabi-Yau entity Into then to be transformed into a consequent six spatial dimensional Calabi-Yau entity.  Let us next stipulate, that both of such said orbifold eigensets, are here to work to bear their soon to be activated  engagement of dimensional expansion, as two different Ward-Cauchy-related phenomenology, that are to embark upon the "trail" of their Hamiltonian operand, through a path that may here be in general described of as being of a tertiary Lagrangian-based path.  Furthermore -- let's now consider that one of the two so-stated mass-bearing orbifold eigensets, is here to convert at a quicker rate, -- from being of an initial f-field that is of a Calabi-Yau space Into then being of a resultant d-field that is of a Calabi-Yau space.  Over the course of discrete time, by which one of the said orbifold eigensets is to convert at a quicker rate than the other orbifold eigensets, into an entity that is here to work to bear more spatial dimensions, -- the so-inferred Ward-Cauchy-related phenomenology that is here, in this particular case, to gain spatial dimensions at a faster rate than the other so-inferred Ward-Cauchy-related phenomenology, -- is then to tend to bear (again, this is simply during the specific given arbitrary respective duration, in which both of such described orbifold eigensets are to be increasing in the number of their spatial dimensions) a higher scalar amplitude of a Kahler-based quotient, than that other orbifold eigenset, that is, instead, to consequently be increasing in the number of spatial dimensions that it is here to be exhibiting, at a slower rate than the other so-stated orbifold eigenset.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sam D. Roach.  (Yes, the one from PHS (MI) class of '89.)

Tense Of Lagrangian And Kahler-Based Quotients

Let us initially consider three different mass-bearing orbifold eigensets, that each work to exhibit the same number of spatial dimensions -- to where each of such said eigensets, is here to both bear the same scalar magnitude of mass, as well as there here to be the Ward-related condition, that each of such said eigensets is to be traveling at the same relativistic velocity, -- from the vantage-point of a central coniaxion.  One of such orbifold eigensets is here to work to bear a unitary Lagrangian, in the course of the process of its motion through its directly corresponding Hamiltonian operand.  Another of such orbifold eigensets is here to work to bear a binary Lagrangian, in the course of the process of its motion through its directly corresponding Hamiltonian operand.  While yet -- the other of such orbifold eigensets is here to work to bear a tertiary Lagrangian, in the course of the process of its motion through its directly corresponding Hamiltonian operand.  Each of these three just mentioned orbifold eigensets, is here to be traveling through a sequential series of group-related instantons, that is here to be of the same scalar magnitude of duration -- to where each of such orbifold eigensets is consequently to then to bear the same scalar magnitude of an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- that is here to be relativistic in similtaniety, via the vantage-point of a central conipoint.  Consequently, in such a given arbitrary case -- that mass-bearing orbifold eigenset in this situation, that is here to work to bear a tertiary Lagrangian, in the process of its motion through space, -- will tend to bear the greatest Kahler-based quotient of the three; That mass-bearing orbifold eigenset in this situation, that is here to work to bear a binary Lagrangian, in the process of its motion through space, -- will tend to bear the next highest Kahler-based quotient of the three;  And Furthermore, that mass-bearing orbifold eigenset in this situation, that is here to work to bear a unitary Lagrangian, in the process of its motion through space, -- will tend to bear the lowest Kahler-based quotient of the three.   To Be Continued! Sam Roach.