Some Additional Information As To Centralized Knotting

Orbifold eigensets that are of a relatively stable atom, as well as the physical phenomenology of those orbifolds that act as Higgs Boson eigenstates -- have a mass that is proportional to the scalar amplitude of the Hodge-based magnitude of their directly corresponding degree of their centralized knotting, in space and time. So, let us consider the mass of an electron versus the mass of a proton -- that is of an atom that is of a relatively stable Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, over a discrete group-related metric, at the subatomic level.  A proton has About 1836 times the mass of an electron, in such a so-stated setting.  This would then mean that such a proton would here work to bear about 1836 times as much of a scalar magnitude of a tense of a centralized knotting, than an electron.  Of course, an electron does not bear a condition of having gluons to put together the three leptons -- that work to bring together the existence of each individually taken electron.  Yet, the physical integration of subatomic mers -- in so as to work to form any key ingredient of an atom -- does indeed work to involve the Ward-Caucy-based condition, of what would here amount to be the existence of what I term of here as an eigenstate of a centralized knotting.  Its just that those individually taken subatomic particles that would work here in so as to help at the formation of putting together the so-stated respective "mers," in so as to make the so-eluded-to "ingredients" of an electron, are a particle that is not technically a gluon.  So, any given arbitrary Higgs Boson eigenstate -- of which works to bear a mass that is 126 times the mass of a proton -- will then work to bear a tense of a scalar magnitude of a centralized knotting, that is of a Hodge-Index that involves an amplitude of 126 times as much of such a said manner of a condition of the so-stated centralized knotting, over any directly corresponding eigenmetric of an equally covariant sequential series of group-related instantons.  So, not only is any phenomenology that is of a certain covariant, codeterminable, and a codifferentiable manner -- to be of a certain behavior, in so as to work to bear a specific magnitude of a quantum of a given arbitrary multiple of having more of an amplitude of tending to have more mass, to be of a Ward-Caucy tense of conditions, in so as to work to tend to bear a proportional multiple of a gravitational-based push and pull over time -- yet, such a physical phenomenology will also tend to bear the same proportionality of a tense of a centralized knotting, over the same covariant group-related eigenmetric.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach