Let us here consider certain of some given arbitrary bosonic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity. The first of such superstrings, is a bosonic string that is stationary in a terrestrial-based manner -- in so that the Lorentz-Four-Contraction that is directly involved with it, may be deemed of as one. (No effectual tendency of a Lorentz-Four-Contraction happening to this respective superstring here at this given arbitrary moment.) Such a superstring of discrete energy permittivity would then work to bear 3*10^8 of what I term of as "partitions." As an ansantz, any number -- when taken to the zero power -- is one. So, the conformal dimension of such a so-stated superstring that is of the general nature of being of basically a two-dimensional spatial-based manner -- will then have a conformal spatial dimensionality of:
1+2^((3*10^8)/10^(43)), or, basically of a spatial dimensionality of "two." Now, let us then consider another bosonic superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- that bears a Lorentz-Four-Contraction of 3*10^8. Such a superstring would then work to bear only one of what I term of as a "partition," to where its conformal dimension would then be: 1+2^((1)/10^43)), or basically of a spatial dimensionality of "two." So, let us now complete an explanation of the pattern -- by now extrapolating a bosonic superstring of discrete energy permittivity that is Lorentz-Four-Contracted by a factor of 4. It would then only work to bear 75*10^6 of what I term of as "partitions," at that Laplacian-based point in time. Its conformal spatial dimensionality would then be 1+2^((75*10^6)/10^43), or basically, "two."
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment