Here Is A Little Knowledge As To Stringular Interchanges

  What are the ramifications of Yakawa Couplings?  Let us consider a specific scenario in which there are here three sets of one-dimensional superstrings as well as three sets of two-dimensional superstrings that we are to take into consideration.  These superstrings that I just mentioned in this case covariantly differentiate over the duration of a Fourier Transformation in such a manner that there are Gaussian Transformations that allow for the perpituity of the kinematic motion of the said superstrings.  One of these sets of one-dimensional superstrings as well as one of these sets of two-dimensional superstrings are both in what I describe as a transition kernel -- the given bilateral metrical conditon that I describe here as a "kernel" is covariant in the dual relationship that exists between the described set of one-dimensional superstrings in correspondance with the described set of two-dimensional superstrings.  During the bilateral dual Fourier-based codifferention that I just was mentioning that here exists between one set of one-dimensional superstrings among one set of two-dimensional superstrings, the other two sets of one-dimensional superstrings as well as the other two sets of two-dimensional superstrings are simultaneously -- via a conicentrally-based perspective -- in what I here describe as a transition eigenstate.  What I describe here as a "transition kernel" is a metrical duration in which a substringular phenomena is undergoing tachyonic propulsion, while what I term here as a "transition eigenstate" is a metrical duration in which a substringular phenomena is undergoing the typically depicted condition known of as Noether Flow.  The two mentioned  substringular groups of one-dimensional superstrings that are dissociated with the other mentioned group of one-dimensional strings that have a covariant Fourier-based codifferentiation with the two mentioned substringular groups of two-dimensional superstrings that are dissociated with the other mentioned group of two-dimensional strings bear kinematic homotopic residue that amounts to that indistinguishably different recycling of topological metric-gauge-like phenomena that allows for a part of those redistributions that allow for a balance between norm and ground states that is needed so that differential geometries may recycle so that Fouier Translations may continue to kinematically differentiate relative to the motion of electromagnetic energy.  This prior mentioned recycling is the continual and spontaneous activity that remains in tact during the existence of discrete physical reality.  The conditon of such a continual and spontaneous activity is known of as Cassimer Invariance.  The residue that is formed during the course of the activity of Cassimer Invariance has a differential symmetry in-between arbitrarily considered instanton durations that involve the previously mentioned substringular groups, while the recycling of such indistinguishably different topological residue also has a differential symmetry appertaining to the point-fill of the inter-related first-ordered-point-particles.  Such activity that exists over the metrical durations that involve the kinematic redistributions that happen over a given arbitrary covariant Fourier codifferentiation also has a differential symmetry that appertains to the spin and the roll of those superfield tensors which act upon the said two sets of one-dimensional superstrings that here bear a covariance with the said two sets of two-dimensioal superstrings in this particular case scenario.  Such superfield tensors here act upon all four groups of substringular groups that bear a tense of relativistic covariance in such a manner so that such an activity that happens over a sequential series of instantons quantifies as a homogeneous wave permittivity that is dually isomorphically bilateral for both of the two sets of superstrings that we are here discussing when one takes this kinemaic relationship in a respective manner.  And the here relatively invariant kinematic activity of the mentioned substringular groups is in this case is thus going through corresponding Gaussian Transformations that cause a change in the said invariance that will -- at this point -- cause a tense of conformal invariance in a relatively tightly-knit locus that is, at this point, bearing a tense of reverse-fractal-based statics.  (The said two sets of one-dimensional strings that bear a covariance with the two said sets of two-dimensional strings are here going through a tense of motion that involves a restricted localization of these sets over a course of orientable multiplicit substringular motion that causes a tense of Noether Flow that is limited in the overall region in which the kinematic delineations are being distributed through over a tightly-knit Lagrangian.  Such a tense of conformal invariance bears ghosts that -- from a relatively macro-level -- form a reverse fractal of statics to anyone who would be observing the GSO ghosts that are arbitrarily described in this given case scenario.  Got to run!  Sam.