The flow here mentioned forms a Dirac-Based cone-like perturbation that has an increase in Hodge-Volume that is here an example of what I meant by a Clifford Expansion. (Reminder).
The said curves are non-trivially isometric if folded in the directoralization of the given Real-Reimmenian holomorphic Laplacian-Lagrangian, since inversely delineated hyperbollic curves bear assymptotic distributions that map-out an inverse chirality that thus does not overlap directly in terms of topological allignment -- in the course of the mentioned sub-Laplacian distribution frameworks that one would be dealing with here.
If, on the other hand, one were to map out the hyperbollic curves that appertain to the holonomic basis of the mentioned expanding sub-Fourier Clifford-field partial thru a Njenhuis norm-to-holomorphic topological-based sway, in such a manner so that the connection at the Fadeev-Popov-Trace is maintained as a conipoint of the associated coniaxial, then, the isomorphism of the said curves would be trivial in terms of the chirality of the mentioned 2-d superstring's light-cone-gauge. This is based on the Ward-Caucy delineations that may be determined by the corresponding proximal effects of the here given arbitrary Lorentz-Four-Contraction field index that acts upon the specific direct neighborhood of the said given 2-d superstring.
When one is dealing with the Clifford-expansion that relates to the sub-metrics that are similar but different during specific given examples that relate to the light-cone-gauge that is involved with 1-d superstrings, the main difference here is that one is then relating to a flat partial field that may be mapped out in this case in a purely Minkowski manner -- instead of dealing with a volume-based partial field that may be mapped out in the prior described case in a Hilbert manner.
I will get back to the session of Course 10 that I left out a while ago in one of my next posts.
I will continue with the suspence later! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment