Part Two of the Fourteenth Session of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here!  Here is the next part of Session 14.
           
One of the reasons for the torroidal shape of the field of such a two-dimensional superstring is because two-dimensional strings bear one and two-dimensional discrepencies along with a three-dimensional basis of field delineation over the course of each individual substringular Laplacian taken individually.  The extrapolated fields of one-dimensional superstrings bear two annuli given the condition that such fields are detected as a thin figure-eight-shape, yet such fields that are directly associated with one-dimensional strings are thinner during each individual Laplacian than those that are related to two-dimensional strings.  This is because, both one and two-dimensional superstrings exist in world-tubes that bear 32 spacial dimensions that have a basis in three spacial dimensions.  Yet one-dimensional strings generate primarily two-dimensional world-sheets.  Such world-sheets are the Gliossi mapping of where a world-sheet had just kinematically differentiated over a successive series of instantons, and bears a holonomic structure that consists of an organization of scattered norm-states.  Such "intertube" and "figure-eight" shapes ae examples of toroidal phenomena.  All illuminated superstrings that are detected are perceived of as having a toroidal shape for that reason!  Even though one-dimensional strings require being perceived of as toroidal, these fields are as such because the residue that these receive is acquired from within a general three-dimensional world-sheet as the assoiciated one-dimensional superstring is propagated through a Lagrangian.  The fact that one-dimensional superstrings primarily have only two-dimensional discrepencies helps to explain also why one-dimensional stringular fields eigenstates per Laplacian condition at instanton are always thinner than the corresponding field eigenstates that are associated with two-dimensional strings per Laplacian.  This is why superstrings are detected in the globally distinguishable as tori-related phenomena.  An individual eigenstate of a substringular field is an example of a torus.  (Such as similar in M-Theory.)  Superstrings are actually vibrating strands and vibrating hoops.  One-Dimensional superstrings are vibrating strands while two-dimensional superstrings are vibrating hoops, as you will remember from Course#2, yet, as detected from the surrounding fields of the superstrings, one-dimensional superstrings are detected as relatively thin propagated tori & two-dimensional strings are detected as relatively fatter propagated tori.  (As is always the case as shown by illuminated superstrings that are detected.)
I will continue with the suspense later!                                                       
Have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely, Sam.