Part Three of the Eighth Session of Course Nine

What I mean by relatively time-oriented and relatively timeless light-cone-gauge eigenstates is that only bosonic or closed superstrings may directly associate with a specific linearly directed time-frame.  Fermionic or open superstrings happen in time, yet, these do not have the capability to directly associate with a specific linearly directed time-frame.  This considers the condition that time moves forward and backward at the same time.  What I mean by a specific linearly directed time-frame takes into consideration that occasionally one-ten-thousandth of history changes.  What is cognitively imbued in the collective consciousness may not be changed in terms of history, yet, what is not cognitively imbued in the collective consciousness has more of a capability of changing in terms of history.
                       
There are five second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that directly associate with one-dimensional superstrings taken individually.  The second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates comprise a first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  There are ten second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that directly associate with two-dimensional superstrings taken individually.  Again, the second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates comprise a first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  The second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates directly associated with one-dimensional superstrings, taken individually, are comprised of two coiled chords -- either sinusoidal-based or flushly-directed-based -- of mini-strings that tie in-between a superstring and the Fadeev-Popov-Trace that is positioned directly in the reverse-holomorphic direction of the mentioned one-dimensional superstring.  The second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates directly associated with two-dimensional superstrings, taken individually, are comprised of a chord of mini-string -- either sinusoidal-based or flushly-directed-based -- that tie in-between a superstring and the Fadeev-Popov-Trace that is positioned directly in the reverse-holomorphic direction of the mentioned two-dimensional superstring.  Two-dimensional superstrings that are discrete units of energy permittivity bear two discrepencies in terms of the topologically pure hermicity that these would otherwise have -- yet, this condition is minor enough to allow for a two-dimenisional superstring to still have a conformal dimension of two.  This is because the discrepencies fit as locally hermitian cusps that help to allow for the field of an individual two-dimensional superstring to have a directly associated three-dimensional field.  These discrepencies exist to the holomorphic side and to the norm-to-holomorphic positioning at the  relative ninety-degree locus of a given two-dimensional superstring and to the reverse-holomorphic side and to the norm-to-reverse-holomorphic positioning at the relative 270 degree locus of the same given two-dimensional superstring.  Such two and three-dimensional discrepencies help to cause the potential instabillity, and thus, the potential entropy that is more associated with the kinematic translation of two-dimensional superstrings than with the kinematic translation of one-dimensional superstrings -- even though the end result of entropy itself is comrised of spurious plain kinetic energy, and, plain kinetic energy bears energy permittivity that is comprised of one-dimensional superstrings.  One-dimensional superstrings that are discrete units of energy permittivity bear one two-dimensional discepency at its relative center.  Such a discrepency deviates from th pure hermicity that these would otherwise have -- yet, this condition is minor enough to allow for a one-dimensional superstring to still have a conformal dimension of one.  This is because the discrepency mentioned fits as a locally hermitian cusp that helps to allow for the field of an individual one-dimensional superstring to have a directly associated two-dimensional field.  Such a discrepency here exists in the norm-to-norm-to-reverse-holomorphic side of any given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring.  I actually have at least a couple more parts to this one session about Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge, and I do not want to bore my reader's with too much information at once.  So, I will continue to ellaborate furter as to the conditions that work to allow for relatively timeless and relatively time-oriented light-cone-gauge eigenstates later.  Until then, I will continue with the suspense later!  God Bless You!
Sincerely, Sam Roach.