Session 4 Of Course 13 About Stringular Transformations

All superstrings always have some amount of momentum of one sort or another.  All superstrings always have some sort of tense of inertia.  All superstrings bear some genus or format of kinematic-based interaction.  This is based upon a certain geometric set of conditions that I will here discuss now.  Inertia is a constant force that acts upon all particles.  All superstrings are connected to each other in some manner or another by mini-string when such superstrings are not frayed.  Mini-String segments are branched out through the general physically-based condition of tree-amplitudes.  A tree-amplitude is -- in the eluded to arbitrary case that I am here referring to -- the branching out of mini-string segments that exist in-between superstrings, the branching-out of which here works to allow for all superstrings to be interconnected in one manner or another throughout the Overall-space-time-continuum.  The Constituency is a term that I often use to represent the Overall-space-time-continuum.  All inertia and all momentum come from the general physical activities of wave-tug and wave-pull.  Wave-tug and wave-pull is the general format of conditions that works to define that force that exists in the Constituency that begins all action.  These actions include all inertia, momentum, and kinematic-based relationships.  Let us say that the mini-string segments that connect to a superstring are here, in this given arbitrary case, to directly push on a directly corresponding superstring via the mentioned mini-string segments -- in such a manner that the eluded to substringular field that thus exists due to the just discussed situation pushes directly upon the said superstring in a taut manner that has insignificant slack in the fractal-based modulus of the said mini-string segments.  This condition works to cause the differential geometry of the directly eluded to substringular neighborhood -- that here includes the said mini-string and the said superstring -- to bear a condition that applies a wave-tug and/or a wave-pull upon the Laplacian-based holomorphically directed holonomic substrate in an abelian manner.  If part of the local mini-string segment branching that is here being discussed is taut as previously mentioned, while part of the local said mini-string branching that is here being discussed is instead relatively bearing a lower scalar magnitude of fractal modulus, then, the wave-tug/wave-pull that will here be applied by the mentioned substringular field upon the said superstring will then be of a partially abelian genus.  Abelian geometry has both an abelian momentum, an abelian inertia, and, an abelian genus of kinematic-based interaction.  Non-Abelian geometry has both a non-abelian momentum, a non-abelian inertia, and a non-abelian genus of kinematic-based interaction.  Partially abelian geometry has both a partially abelian momentum, a partially abelian inertia, and a partialy abelian genus of kinematic-based interaction.  I will continue with the next session later!  Sam.