Session 2 Of Course 13

Strings always differentiate kinematically over any given arbitrary Fourier Transformation from one specific positioning to another, per successive iterations of instanton.  Each time a superstring comes back to an iteration of BRST, it is in a different position and/or in a different spot than it was in in the previous iteration of BRST. Strings that undergo homostasis in an equilibrium are constantly changing in position and locus during each ensuing iteration of instanton -- particularly after each individually considered iteration of BRST.  This is true, no matter how restrained the condition of conformal invariance may happen to be for any given arbitrary superstring that is to be considered here.  Yet, if the given superstrings are truly in equilibrium, then, the general activity of the said strings does not change -- in spite of the fact that the directly prior conditions will still hold as true.  Thus, the general activity of the given superstrings that are were just eluded to is relatively invariant, yet, the given superstrings are constantly changing in some sort of redelineation in one way or another after each successive iteration that these said strings are associated with.  This process of relative change of strings -- in spite of how tightly-knit the locus of their successive repositioning may be -- is a potentially relatively invariance that is conformal. -- That is, to say, the change of the said superstrings when in terms of their redelineation works to produce an equilibrium of an activity that transpires on a larger scale.  Change is constant.  Differentiation is even more constant, since it may be either non-time-oriented or time oriented -- depending on the specific circumstance.  Yet, strings are said to be conformally invariant when these involve a constant tense of limited Lagrangian projection per kinematically-based codifferentiation over a given arbitrary time period.  Sometimes, superstrings are conformally invariant in one tense, while yet being relatively more variant in another tense of consideration.  Let us take for instance a certain quantum of light that is projected into pure water.  The photons of the said light scatter to an extent when the said light strikes the mentioned water.  The superstrings that work to comprise the mass of the waater thus have some intrinsic characteristics of variance over time.  Yet, the light travels in what would here be the path of least resistance through the water -- rather than going through the path of least distance.  The bending of the said light -- as well as how and to what degree the light slows down while going through the water -- acts as according to Snell's Law.  As the mentioned light adjust to moving through the water discussed here, the light -- although being in less of a condition of conformal invariance -- will still bear a certain tense of conformal invariance.