To Answer Many Of Your Questions

The harmonics mode of the vibratorial oscillation of a superstring during the generally noticed duration of instanton is related to the format of its spin. For example, if a superstring bears a harmonic mode during BRST, then, the said superstring will be said to have a whole spin. Yet, if a superstring bears an anharmonic mode during BRST, then, the said superstring will be said to have a fractional spin. Bosonic superstrings are closed strings. Closed superstrings that are not heterotic are two-dimensional superstrings. Fermionic superstrings are open strings. Open strings are one-dimensional superstrings. Fermionic superstrinigs bear an anharmonic mode of vibratorial oscillation when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices during BRST. Fermionic strings are said to have a fractional spin. Bosonic superstrings bear a harmonic mode of vibratorial oscillation when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices during BRST. Bosonic strings are said to have a whole spin. During the generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow, fermionic superstrings bear a harmonic mode of vibratorial oscillation when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices over the period of the said general format of duration mentioned here in this sentence. Also, during the generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow, bosonic strings bear an anharmonic mode of vibratorial oscillation when in terms of the pulse of their spin-orbital indices. Yet, the sequential series of the vibratorial oscillations of both the respective one and two-dimensional strings bears an even metrical isomorphic flow of pulse that works to form a basis of an even function for both substringular formats.  This is related to the concept of Christoffel connections, in a metrical tense.  Superstrings average at one basic location during BRST.  The said superstrings are taken as a snapshot basically during the said BRST.  The integration of a successive series of these "snapshots" forms the motion that forms the energy of space-time-fabric.  Superstrings, though, have more to do with the angular momentum of discrete energy, while, their directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Traces have more to do with the spin-orbital momentum of discrete energy. Yet, to some extent, every physical phenomenon bears at least some sort of angular momentum, and, every physical phenomenon bears at least some sort of spin-orbital momentum. The drive of a phenomenon through a directoral-based Lagrangian is the general operation of a tense of angular momentum. The shaking-like wave-tug/wave-pull of a phenomenon through a directoral-based Lagrangian is the general operation of a tense of spin-orbital momentum. The angular momentum of superstrings and the spin-orbital momentum of Fadeev-Popov-Traces works to relate the basis as to how the various spaces and sub-spaces of the substringular inter-relate in either a Real Reimmanian-based Gaussian or in a Li Algebra manner, while, the spin-orbital momentum of superstrings and the angular momentum of Fadeev-Popov-Traces works to relate the basis as to the covariant-based parity that exists among the various spaces and subspaces in the substringular. Again, superstrings are discrete units of energy permittivity, while, Fadeev-Popov-Traces are discrete units of energy impedance. Hold onto your hats, and, I will continue with the suspense later! Sam.