Course 4 on The Globally Distinguishable Vs. The Substringular, Session 9, Part 2(Two)

The globally distinguishable has no infinite changes in the position of an object between two direct moments of where that object is. -- In other words, in the globally distinguishable, if an object is at one spot in one nanosecond in the globally distinguishable, it cannot appear to exist at the other end of the Continuum during the next nanosecond unless it enters the SUBSTRINGULAR. In the globally distinguishable, every particle that appears near each other is near each other. Particles that we view of as far away from each other are far away from each other. Basically, the globally distinguishable assumes that the reality that we observe is as is. It assumes that the three-dimensional delineations that we observe actually define the basis of interaction, when, in fact, these do not do that. Newtonian physics works based on the conclusions reached with the globally distinguishable. Most "logical" conclusions of physics based on matter interplay involves all stipulation as derived from the workings of the globally distinguishable. How can one say that the globally distinguishable is ever wrong? Anomalous singularities alone proves the fact that the globally distinguishable is not the ultimate in perception. When the interacting physical limits define the basis of an object to be interspersed in space and time, then it can be proven that the locus of an object is not completely isolated, and inevitably that all energies interact within very, very brief periods. Thus, no objects are only closely isolated for what we would term of as even the briefest time period. The briefest time that is actually time is 10^(-43) of a second.