As To Scalar Magnitude -- Etale/p-Adic Cohomology

 An Etale cohomology tends to work to bear a heuristic sheaving. 

When the Etale cohomology abelian-related "Grouping" factor, has a scalar magnitude of 

 "-i*(e^2);"

Then, the scalar magnitude, of the directly corresponding heuristic sheaving, will consequently tend to  be "0." (This will consequently tend to indicate, that there will here, in this particular case, be NO heursitic sheaving being displayed here.)

Whereas:

A p-Adic cohomology tends to work to bear an inverse sheaving.

When the p-Adic cohomology abelian-related "Grouping" factor is "0;"

Then, the scalar magnitude of the directly corresponding inverse sheaving, will consequently tend to be  

"-i*(e^2)." (This will consequently tend to indicate, that there will here, in this particular case, be No abelian-related "Grouping" being exhibited here.)

Please let me know if this is up to par! I am just beginning to learn of this type of cohomology! SAM.