In my model of string theory, the following is the fundamental difference, between what I term of as being the "externalized core-field-density" of a superstring/counter string, and, the topology itself of such a said superstring/counter string:
As the multiplicity of mini-string-related segmentation, of which works to form the topological substrate of superstring-related fields (in order for the actual fields of such superstrings/counter strings to have any directional sense), works to be trace-wise mapped-out, in a Laplacian-Based manner, to where such a trace-wise approach, is directed, in a respectively covariant manner, Towards an actual given arbitrary inferred superstring/counter string of discrete energy permittivity, the density of such an inferred barrage of convergent zero-point-energy-related "eigenstates," is to consequently become so "thick," that the multiplicity of phenomenology, of which is here to be on the order of, as being as large of, or larger than, the general phenomenology of discrete energy quanta, will usually tend to Not be able to get any closer to the actual "topology" of such a said superstring/counter string.
Such said mini-string-related segmentation, tends to have a significantly greater convergence Towards superstrings/counter strings, than towards their directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates.
The multiplicity of the general region, adjutant to a superstring of discrete energy permittivity, at which the density of the convergent mini-string-related segmentation is so dense, that phenomenology will tend to not have much of a likelihood, to become even nearer to such a said superstring, is what I term of as being, -- the "externalized core-field-density" of a superstring/counter string.
Whereas; -- The multiplicity of the actual topology, of a given arbitrary superstring/counter string of discrete energy permittivity, is the actual phenomenology of such a said string/counter string, -- in and of itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment