Let us say, one were to initially be considering a given arbitrary Non Abelian superstring of discrete energy permittivity, to where the directly corresponding superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is here to be directly to the relative reverse-holomorphic side of the respective directly associated counter string of discrete energy permittivity. The said superstring is to tend to basically work to exhibit the particle-related nature of discrete energy permittivity; whereas, -- the said counter string is to tend to basically work to exhibit the wave-related nature of discrete energy permittivity. I believe that superstrings -- of which are the smallest actual phenomenology of discrete energy permittivity, are here to be comprised of by a "beaded thread" of what I term of as being "first-order point particles," to where such an inferred set of such "beads," are comprised of by a metaphorical "balled-up" inter-twining of what I term of as being "mini-string-related segmentation," to where, also, this phenomenology, of which I describe of, as being the actual "beads" of such a stated tense of "mini-singular segmentation," work to act as the actual physical stratum, of what may be described of as being, "zero-point energy." As According to my model of string theory, this tends to be exemplified -- by the general physical condition, in which there is to be much more mini-string-related segmentation (that general phenomenology, of which one of its reductional functions, is to tend to work to form those Ward-Cauchy-related eigenstates, that are to work to allow for the directional guidance, that is here to exist among superstrings, so that there may be any viable inter-relationships, among the vast multiplicity of the panoply of superstring-related fields), that is here to be inter-bound amongst those respective first-order point particles, that work to help in forming counter strings at a sub-energy level, than the scalar amplitude of mini-string-related segmentation, that is here to be inter-bound, amongst those respective first-order particles, that work to help in forming superstrings at a sub-energy level. Next; let us say that the herein inferred discrete quantum of energy, that is here to be in the process of being described, is now to spontaneously alter into being of an Abelian light-cone-gauge topology. As this is here to be in the process of happening, -- the Superstring of discrete energy permittivity is Now to be altered, as well, in its relative distribution -- when this is in terms of its covariant positioning, in its relation to its directly corresponding counter string. Once this is here to take place, the said superstring, at this point in duration, is to be respectively associated with being delineated, at the relative holomorphic side of its directly corresponding counter string. Again, as was inferred before, what is here to be considered as being the "superstring" of discrete energy permittivity, is to have less mini-string-related segmentation branching from its core substrate of topological manifold, than its directly corresponding counter string is to have branching from it. Also, once again, as well; superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, tend to work to behave as basically being the particle-related nature of such said energy, whereas -- the directly corroborative counter strings of such discrete energy permittivity, tend to work to behave as basically being the wave-related nature of such said energy. SAMUEL ROACH.
No comments:
Post a Comment