Some More Material About Session 2 of Course 16

Due to the need for the perturbation that happens to every superstring eventually, since Gaussian Transformations and gauge transformations eventually happen to every superstring -- every Rham cohomology eventually becomes a Doubolt cohomology.  Yet, since there is the physical need for every superstring to move in the direction of most relative stability, every unfrayed Doubolt cohomology eventually becomes a Rham cohomology.  This is also due to the condition that any superstring that moves in a hermitian-based trajectoral path -- that is not only hermitian in terms of its Lagrangian-based delineation, yet, is also hermitian when in terms of the harmonics of its pulsation -- must eventually bear a spur in either its Lagrangian-based delineation and/or its metrical-based delineation.  This works to cause the mappable tracing of the trajectory of the projection of any given superstring that is initially stable -- in terms of the harmonics of both the integration of the harmonics of its path, and also in terms of the harmonics of its pulse -- to eventually become of a Doubolt-based cohomolgy.  This is due to the condition that, any superstring that bears either a Lagrangian-based spike and/or a metrical-based spike in its trajectory, will work to form a physical memory of its trajectory that is of what may be termed of as a Doubolt cohomology.  This is also due to the condition that every superstring that -- at any given arbitrary metrical-based local delineation -- is undergoing a Chern-Simmons effect upon the cohomology, that is directly related to the mappable tracing of the trajectory of it projection, both in terms of its Lagrangian-based path delineation and/or the harmonics of its pulsation over time, if unfrayed, will eventually stabilize into a hermtian-based effect that is upon the cohomology that is directly related to the mappable tracing of the trajectory of its projection.  Again, all Doubolt-based cohomology that is unfrayed must eventually alter back into a Rham-based cohomology.  This is why the condition as to whether or not a cohomology is considered to be Rham, or, as to the condition whether or not a cohomology is considered to be Doubolt, is to be based upon both the Lagrangian-based span and the metrical-based span that may be worked into any given arbitrary extrapolation that is to be used in so as to quantitatively determine whether or not a mappable tracing of the physical memory of the trajectory of a superstring is of a purely hermitian nature (Rham), or, of a Chern-Simmons nature (Doubolt).  A cohomology that is to be extrapolated in a regional locus that starts out as either Rham or Doubolt, while then converting into a cohomololgy that is respectively either Doubolt or Rham -- may be considered as either partially Rham or partially Doubolt in nature.  Or, if a cohomology bears only Lagrangian-based spurs or only metrical-based spurs, but not both -- may be considered as Doubolt in terms of its Lagrangian-based format and Rham in terms of its metrical-based format, or, respectively, it may be considered as Rham in terms of its metrical-based format and Doubolt in terms of its Lagrangian-based format.  I will continue with the suspense late!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.