Some Substringular Activity In Laymens Terms

Let us consider the following metaphorical analogy, -- in so as to work to improve the reader's perspective, as to what is going on in the Ward-Cauchy-based bounds of the substringular realm -- by relating as to what is happening here, in pretty-much laymens terms.  Let us say -- in this analogy -- that one is to be the orbifold eigenset in and of itself.  The so-eluded-to person is to be moving in a direction-based path, in so as to reach a given arbitrary physical destination.  The person -- as a metaphorical orbifold eigenset -- is to then to be the allegorical Hamiltonian operator.  The region that is to be traversed, from the point of origin -- to the point of destination -- is to be the allegorical Lagrangian-based path.  The medium that one is to be moving through, over the course of moving along the said Lagrangian-based path, is the allegorical Hamiltonian operand.  What one is doing in the process of moving through the said allegorical Hamiltonian operand -- is the metaphorical Hamiltonian operation.  If one is to be making a straight shot from the point of origin to the point of destination, then, one may then say that the path as to where one had just traveled, is of a discrete unitary Lagrangian-based path.  Even if the path that is here to be traversed, is not of a directly straight translation over time, -- if the path that is to be traversed, is of one smoothly taken genus of motion, then, the path is of a discrete Lagrangian-based path.  And, if the path that one is to here to metaphorically take -- is to be done in a bunch of jagged motions, then, the translated Lagrangian-based path is not discrete.  Next, translate what I have just conveyed -- to what is happening at the Ward-Cauchy-based level of the substringular, and, you will then get a better idea as to some of what I have tried to teach you, about the cohomological-related mappable-tracing of the motion of orbifold eigensets, over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.