Let us initially consider an orbifold eigenset, as I had described yesterday -- of which is a set of superstrings that operate in so as to perform one specific function, that goes from being of a superconformal invariant nature, to then scattering briefly into a looser mode of Majorana-Weyl-Invariance, to then scattering back into a tighter tense of conformal invariance, and back again, and so on. Let us next say -- that as this is happening, the field of the said orbifold eigenset as a whole, is to be otherwise tending to be traveling in the relative holomorphic direction at a constant rate. In this manner -- there are to here to be two different general partials of the correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction, that are to be Yukawa to the so-eluded-to Fourier differentiation, that is of the said orbifold eigenset, in this just mentioned process. There is to be that Lorentz-Four-Contraction partial, that is due to the directly pertinent tense of the scalar amplitude of the extent of the directly corresponding Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, that is to be differential in its Yukawa influence upon the so-stated orbifold eigenset, -- and, there is also to be that Lorentz-Four-Contraction partial, that is due to the directly pertinent tense of the scalar amplitude of what would otherwise be the tendency of a motion that is in the relatively metrical smooth holomorphic motion of the said orbifold eigenset, as it is here to be translated as a whole, across what may be termed of here as an approximate discrete unitary Lagrangian path, that is to bear both a codifferentiable and a codeterminable cohomological wave-tug -- across the space-time stratum of both that Hamiltonian operand that is in the direction of the region of its perturbative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, as well as that Hamiltonian operand that is of the tendency of moving in the relatively holomorphic direction of the region of the mappable-tracing of the just mentioned discrete unitary Lagrangian path.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment