A Little Bit Of Clarification as to A Certain Lagrangian

When I eluded the concept that one is to map a relativistic multiplicative increase in a scalar distance from a Poincaire-based locus -- when in terms of a Laplacian-based setting at the peak of an eigenmetric of Polyakov Action when relative to another of such conditions, what I meant by the center of the outer Neumman-Ward bounds of the outer surface of the said Gliossi-based Poincaire setting is the topological edge of where the eluded to superstring that one may arbitrarily consider in a given case to be undergoing an eigenmetric of a Polyakov Action as is according to its given arbitrary Lorentz-Four-Contraction during the BRST portion of a given arbitrary instanton reaches its peak as it decompactifies to the inverse of the degree in which the said superstring is contracted.  So, the multiplicative scalar that one utilizes in a Laplacian-based mapping, in so as to work to determine the condition of the Lorentz-Four-Contraction when in terms of examining the physical framework of the said superstring during the said instanton, is based on considering the Lagrangian that one may traverse toward the fully contracted potential end of where the said superstring would be if it was fully contracted, as taken over a unitary-based directoral over the Neumman-Ward space-time-curvature of space, as the space is intrinsically curved in so as to determine a physically-based linearity from the mentioned Poincaire toward the locus of  where a theoretically full LFC would place the end of such a related Poincaire if the said superstring was fully contracted.  (This is Not to be confused with taking linearity based on a Wilson-Line!)  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.