Manner of Norm-Projection Slide

Let us consider a situation in which there are two norm-state-projections that are to here strike, in the shape of a cross.  Let us say, here, that both of these types of norm-state-projections of this given arbitrary case are Hausendorf-Projections.  Let us here initially think in terms of two of such types of the so-stated norm-projections -- in which the concavity of the end-points of such a tense of  phenomenology, that are each here brought together by their respective subtensions of mini-stringular segmentation -- works to bear a condition to where the relatively horizontal-based of such projections, that is moving in a cross-product-based manner, moves through its Lagrangian in such a manner in so that the end-points of what would here act as basically the equivalence of the holonomic substrate of an x axial, would bear the said concavity in which the so-eluded-to phenomenology that works to comprise the said end-points are then here curving away from each other in a non-time-orientable manner.  Now, think in terms of the relative holomorphic direction of the one of such so-stated norm-state-projections, when in covariance with the relative holomorphic direction of the other of such so-stated norm-state-projections -- each of which would here work to bear a tense of a relatively antiholomorphic directoral wave-tug/wave-pull, when one will here consider the Hamiltonian drive of the first of such projections in retrospect to the other.  Let us now call the covariant-mode of the motion of such an implied tense of a Gliossi-based interaction, as in the inward or z to negative z based directorial-based pull (k hat).Then, the tendency of the manner of the resultant torsional-based sliding for the previously mentioned holonomic substrate that would here act as the equivalence of an x axial, would then here work to bear a wave-tug/wave-pull that would tend to be more inclined to veer the so-stated norm-based projections -- to what may be here viewed of as the relative right or the relative left -- or, in what may be here thought of as ether in the x or in the negative x direction (i hat) -- when this is compared to if the horizontally displaced projection that is here moving in either the z or negative z direction were to, instead, bear such an end-point concavity that would angle towards each other.   Now, if instead, the curvature of the concavity of the end-points of the what would here act as basically the equivalence of the holonomic substrate of an x axial, which would here be of the two of such just eluded-to Hausendorf-Projections, is to curve inward, then, the resultant torsional-based sliding would then here work to tend to bear a wave-tug/wave-pull that would be more inclined to veer the so-stated norm-based projections to what may be here viewed of as the relative up or the relative down -- or, in either what may be here thought of as in the relative y or negative y direction (j hat)  -- when this is compared to if these were to instead to bear such an end-point concavity that would angle away from each other.  I will continue with the suspense later!
Sam Roach.