To The Effect of Mostly Empty Space

When one is to think of phenomenology that is most tangible to our general framework of reality -- phenomena of mass, such as a chair, a desk, or a book -- one is to probably think of the basic concept of a mass, or, a thing that one is able to touch.  Initially, if one were to not have a scientific background, one would probably think that the phenomenology of mass that we were just mentioning were to be without a lot of empty space.  Yet, when one is to study the rudiments of science,  one will then shortly learn that mass is actually mostly empty space -- molecules are mostly empty space, the atoms that work to comprise the said molecules are mostly empty space, etcetera.  Yet, if one is to think of the concept that we, as humans, are only able to only tend to perceive of those basic phenomena that are comprised by the substringular aspects of those fundamental conditions of phenomenology -- that are of our own universe -- out of the overall multiverse -- then, the degree and the manner as to that amount of phenomenology that we normally perceive of that is mostly empty space is not as sparsely set, as a condition of being empty space, as we would initially conceive it as -- from the time that we initially learn about basic science until we were to learn of this latter mentioned concept.  Phenomenology of our universe work to consist of superstrings that are pertinent to us, that are pretty much exactly orthogonal to each other -- when these are adjacent.  Superstrings that are adjacent that are Not exactly orthogonal, with a covariant wobble of 1.104735878*10^(-81)i degrees -- relative to each other, are not of the same Gaussian-based format, and, are thus not of the same universe.  Superstrings that are not of the same universe are not necessarily directly viable to each other, and thus, may not seem as real to the immediate extrapolation of an observer -- upon an initial attempt at extrapolation.  Please see my other writings.  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.