As to the Fractal of Magnetic Fields, Part One

Here is some of a heads-up as to the nature of the fractal of magnetic fields -- when one is to here consider some of the phenomenology that happens in the substringular.  Initially, the basis of the fractal of magnetic fields in the substringular is based, in part, on the multivarious conditions of the inter-relations of Fock Space.  This is due, in part, to the condition as to that -- the individual eigenstates of the wave-functionability of discrete energy permittivity is most directly associated with those individually taken eigenstates of superstringular counterparts that iterate just to the relative holomorphic side of the here multiplicitly taken eigenmembers of that holomorphic substrate, that acts as those superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that would here behave as the basis of the pointal-based conditionalilty of such a multiplicitly taken condition of discrete energy.  Just as the fractal of discrete electric field in the substringlar is based in part upon the angular momenta-based Hamiltonian-based operations of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- that of which may be here considered as being the fractal of discrete magnetic field in the substringular is based in part upon the spin-orbital-based Hamiltonian-based operations of superstrings of discrete energy permititivity.  So, since there are by far many more wave-like mini-stringular-based segments of core-field-density that are extended from that phenomenology that acts as the holonomic substrate of the counterparts of superstrings of discretely-based energy -- such a so-eluded-to Ward-Neumman-based physical bounds of the here multiplicitly taken counterstringular phenomenology may be then here considered to bear more of a shell-based piecewise continuous-based nature than that phenomenology that may be, instead, extrapolated upon a physical consideration of the Ward-Neumman-based physical bounds of the here multiplicitly taken superstringular phenomenology that I have here recently eluded-to as being the pointal basis of discrete energy permittivity.  So, the literal superstrings of discrete energy permititivity act more like a particle, and, the directly corresponding counterstrings -- of which iterate just to the relatively holomorphic side of these so-stated superstrings -- act more as waves (in comparison).  Since the counterparts of superstrings work in so as to behave in more of a shell-like manner -- in a direct comparison to the here so-mentioned particle-based holonomic substrate-based phenomenology of discrete energy permittivity -- the resultant Clifford-based Expansion that would thence be propagated from the kinematic and Laplacian-based extensions of such waves, that would then be protruded, over the projection of there exterialized trajectory, will inevitably tend to reach an assymptotic substringular Ward-Caucy bounds, work to form at least some sort of a homogenous slope, of which would eventually indirectly work to cause part of the reason as to the activity of the space-hole, this "space-hole" of which is what I term of as that general  activity that happens to the discretely ensuing kinematic superstrings and counterstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- during the majorization of what I term of as the Bases  of Light, in which the ultimate fractal of pressurized vacuum that exists in-between the superstrings and their correlative counterstrings works to cause those minute homotopic changes right before the quaternionic-instanton-field-impulse, that are needed in order for the holonomic substrate-based conditionalities of norm-based conditions to be able to change.  To Be Continued!  Sam.