Comparing Hausendorf Projections to Campbell-Hausendorf Projections

A Hausendorf Projection is comprised of two ends of phenomenology that I will soon describe, that are bound in a homotopic manner, via mini-stringular segmentation that works to interconnect the two said ends of the here directly affiliated holonomic substrate of this case scenario -- into a projection that acts as a Hamiltonian operator of a set of first-ordered point particles, that work upon superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, in so as to both help superstrings to commute and to work to form cohomologies out of the physical memories of the so-stated superstrings.  At the two so-stated ends of the said phenomenology of a Hausendorf Projection, there is -- at one of the given arbitrary said ends, the presence of one half-shell-like curved holonomic substrate that is a composite of a given arbitrary number of layers of first-ordered point particles -- that work to comprise the so-stated half-shell-like structure -- the concavity of such a half-shell-like construction working to bear one discrete holomorphicity of concavity, while, at the other given arbitrary said end, there is the presence of one half-shell-like curved holonomic substrate that is a composite of the so-stated half-shell-like structure -- the concavity of such a half-shell-like construction working to bear an asymmetry tense of its holomorphic eigenbase of concavity.  However, the difference between a Campbell-Hausendorf Projection and a Hausendorf Projection is the physical condition that one of the ends of the so-eluded-to projection is a lone first-ordered point particle instead of what would otherwise be the otherwise eluded-to half-shell-like construction.  So, the concavity of what tends to be the relatively holomorphic end of a Campbell-Hausendorf Projection may bear one of two options of holomorphic-oriented eigenbase of concavity.  So, to reach the main point of this discussion -- When a non-collapsing Hausendorf Projection operates in so as to bear a Yakawa Coupling with either a superstring of discrete energy permittivity or a world-sheet, in a Gliossi-based manner, the initial scalar magnitude of the Hamiltonian Hodge-index eigenbase will tend to be relatively higher than that of a Campbell--Hausendorf Projection that were to form such an otherwise similar Gliossi-based Yakawa Coupling -- on account of the added wave tug of the alterior so-stated half-shell-like composite that a Hausendorf Projection is in part comprised of in its Ward-Neumman construction, while, the duration of impact of a Campbell-Hausendorf Projection will tend to be longer in gauge-metrical duration -- on account of the condition that the alterior half-shell-like holonomic substrate that works to form a Hausendorf Projection will tend to pull-off the Gliossi-based interbinding of the said Projection from the respective either superstring or world-sheet that it had formed such a Yakawa Coupling with directly previously, in the substringular, and, the nature of the strand-like structure of that part of a Campbell-Hausendorf Projection that is to the relatively reverse-holomorphic end of the so-stated half-shell-like composite will tend to bear significantly less of a reverberation-based mode than that of a Hausendorf-Projection would.  This is if the genus of both their Lagrangian-based mode and the manner of their abelian geometry are conformally invariant, to the same Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Index.  To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam Roach.