Initially, as I have mentioned before, the ghost anomalies or the cohomological-based indices, that are formed by the mappable tracings of two-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, tend to bear a relatively torroidal tense of morphology -- while, the ghost anomalies or the cohomological-based indices that are formed by the mappable tracing of one-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity tend to bear a relatively conical tense of morphology. So, Gliossi-Sherk-Olive ghosts tend to bear either a torroidal or a conical shape -- via the mappable tracings of their respective trajectory, over time. Yet, the shape of a Neilson-Kollosh ghost takes a little bit more of an explanation to tell here. In general, the shape or the morphology of a Neilson-Kollosh cohomological-based mappable tracing (one eigenset of the directly inferred general genus of such indices) will either tend to be the shape of an annulus of either a converging or a diverging hyperbolically-shaped toroid, or, the shape of a Neilson-Kollosh ghost may often, instead, be of the outer perimeter of the Ward-Neumman bounds of the respective shape of an annulus of either a converging or a diverging hyperbolically-shaped toroid.
I will continue with the suspense later! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment