Manner of Norm-State-Projection Strike

The main difference between a Hausendorf norm-state-projection and a Campbell norm-state-projection is that the relative holomorphic-moving end of a Hausendorf projection is of some sort of a half-shell-like-shape, while the relative holomorphic-moving end of a Campbell projection is of a disc or plate-like shape. This works to form the condition, that, when a Hausendorf norm-state-projection works to strike either a superstring or a world-sheet -- over the course of a set sequential series of group-related instantons -- the activity of what may here be deemed in this given arbitrary scenario as the Gliossi-based contact of the said Hausnedorf projection upon the respective superstring or world-sheet, will tend to be of more of a sliding-based torsioning, while, the activity of what may be termed of her in this given arbitrary scenario as the Gliossi-based contact of, instead, a Campbell projection -- upon the respective superstring or world-sheet, will tend to be more of a pulse-based torsioning.  This is due to the innate characteristic as to the difference between the resultant activity of a physical phenomenon being struck by a relatively thin perimeter with a comparitively large annulus, when in comparison to the resultant activity of a physical phenomenon being struck by a plate-like structure that has no annulus.  When a point of contact has a physical composite that bears a shape that one may here describe as a thin perimeter that has a comparatively large annulus, is to directly touch another phenomenon that were to here act as a fret of a relatively taut phenomenology that has an optimum fractal modulus and an optimum elastic modulus, then, as an ansantz, the here direct genus of contact will tend to bear  here a slippage in the process of the kinematic inter-play of the two phenomena-based holonomic substrate-based eigenstates that we are dealing with here.  Yet, if one were, instead, dealing with a point in contact that would here have a physical composite that bears a shape, that one may here describe as a disc or plate-like configuration that would here have no annulus -- that were to here directly touch another phenomenon, this latter mentioned phenomenon of holonomic substrate -- of which were to also act as a fret of a relatively taut phenomenology, ansantz, the here direct genus of contact will tend to bear less of a slippage and more of a pulse, in the process of the direct contact of what is here a Gliossi-based contact and/or some other sort of inter-bound Yakawa Coupling, in the kinematic inter-play of the two phenomena-based holonomic substrate-based eigenstates of this here anterior scenario.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.