As To Scalar Magnitude of Certain Hamiltonians

When one norm-state-projection strikes another norm-state-projection, the resultant activity that happens on account of the said interaction, is based upon the scalar magnitude of the overall fractal of substringular momenta-based indices -- as this so-stated resultant is based upon the overall interaction of the directly corresponding Hamiltonian operations, these of which would here work to interplay in such a given arbitrary case of retrospection.  Here, let us now consider a certain general given arbitrary case of one relatively reverse-holomorphic norm-state-projection, that is to be extrapolated as annharmonically striking a forwawrd-holomorphic norm-state-projection -- as one set unique metric, that would here locally work to form a partial derivative of a Rayleigh-based scattering, that would, when such a so-eluded-to reverse-derivative of an anharmonic scattering of a ghost anomaly is to happen, work to break down one tense of substringular cohomological index at one respective given arbitrary locus -- where a ghost-based index had previously been formed, over the course of a previous Reimman scattering that had initially worked to form the initial said ghost anomaly.  Let us say, here, that the two approaching norm-state-projections that are to here soon collide, bear a trivially exterial abelian wave-tug/wave-pull, that would be otherwise adding a tense of what may be considered here as an unwanted substringular pulse.  So, then here, the only initial factors that one may thence potentially work to be able to extrapolate -- as the considerations that would here work to determine the resultant action that would result from the collision of the two so-stated assymetrically flowing norm-state-projections, would be the following:  1)The immediate lengths of the covariant gauge-action of the norm-state-projections.  2)  The spots at which the two covariant-based norm-state-projections are to strike in a Gliossi-based manner.  3)  The covariant-based angle of Gliossi-based contact.
4)  The Hodge-Index as to the quantity of a given arbitrary set number of cross-sections of mini-stringular segmentations that are to strike each other, when this is taken per unit Ward-Caucy-based region of Yakawa-based covariant-based interaction, per inter-related group instanton.
5)  The covariant-based inter-related angle of the covariant-based angle of Gliossi-based contact.
6)  Whether the contact is Noether or not.  If not, both the manner and the degree of the correlative tachyonic propulsion that is to be here considered.  7)  The means and the manner of the Lagrangian, in so as to bear the extrapolatable directorals.  8)  The covariant manner of both the transversal and the radial manner of approach.  9)  The type of norm-state-projections that are involved -- and, the specific Ward-Caucy-based conditions that would then here work to describe the manner as to how these directly corresponding norm-state-projections are geometrically designed as.
10)  The shape of the phenomenologies of the so-eluded-to norm-state-projections, that are directly involved with that Gliossi-based contact of which would then here relate to the here discussed general manner of such an extrapolatable collision.  Based upon these conditions, and potentially more, this type of extrapolation may be able to help in working to determine a ground-work in so as to the resultant of the collision of two antiholomorphically colliding norm-state-projections, such a collision in this case of which would then here work to annharmonically scatter a ghost anomaly or a cohomological index -- via a respective given arbitrary Rayleigh scattering, in so as to make room for the further activity of the motion of discrete energy.  To Be Continued!  Sam.