Part Two of the 12th Session of Course 11 About Orbifolds

From where I left off last time as to the differences in norm-conditions working to designate different orbifolds from existing in different universes, if, under any given arbitrary case, certain Planck-like phenomena that are adjacent and are also of the same universe are here to bear orphoganation with a wobble of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees, then, such a condition is what works to help define the corresponding Planck-like phenomena -- along with their corelative superstrings and substringular counterparts -- as belonging to the same universe.  This is while the condition of adjacent Planck-like phenomena that are adjacent, yet, are of different universes will bear norm-based orphoganal conditions that involvle a covariant relativistic wobble other than ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees.  The latter condition of which works to cause both the corresponding Planck-like phenomena, their corelative superstrings, and the corelative substringular counterparts to here belong to different universes.  This is over both the sub-Fourier-based transformation in which the said superstrings are differentiating -- over the sub-metric in which such substringular phenomena are vibrating -- during the course of a group instanton, as well as over the successive series of instantons in which the mentioned substringular phenomena differentiate kinematically over the time-wise course of the directly related Fourier-Transformation in which such superstrings are covariantly codifferentiating in a codeterminable manner.  Such an inter-relation of norm-based conditions is derived by considering the angling of the various corresponding adjacent Planck-like phenomena relative to one another, while then considering such an angling as equal to the degree that the said codifferentiable superstrings are off of wobbling from the discrete degree of wobble of a Planck-like phenomenon of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees.  This is due to the condition that the scalar variance of the parameters as to the angling that two or more Planck-like phenomena are off from a discrete unit of Fadeev-Popov-Trace wobble torques toward the multiplicit Laplacian-based delineations as to where the said Traces are at -- in such a Clifford-based sway that happens in such a manner so that this format and genus of eluded to torque works to form a covariance in wobble that forms a larger basis of wobble.  This is in consideration of the condition that an individual Planck-like phenomenon that is not frayed always wobbles during the BRST portion of group instanton at an angle of ~.1104735878*10^(-81)I degrees.  This wobble is considered as Imaginary on account of the condition that the sway inter-relation of such wobbling happens at the Poincaire-based locus of each of the mentioned Planck-like phenomena, to where it always happens in a back-and forth manner that is covariant in one manner or another to all of the Planck-like phenomena that exist in space and time over the course of each iteration of group instanton.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.