Thursday, February 28, 2013

As To The Mass Increase Due To Lorentz-Four-Contractions

As a Lorentz-Four-Contraction is higher, a said given arbitrary superstring is denser during the corresponding course of BRST eigenmetrics that happen within the corelative eigenmetrics of group instanton that associate with the conditions of any given arbitrary superstring undergoing a Lorentz-Four-Contraction.  Such a Lorentz-Four-Contraction decompactifies to the inverse degree of the directly associated contraction during the Polyakov Action that happens during the directly related said instantons (more specifically, during the BRST portion of such iterations of instanton.)  .  Since the directly related superstrings that are more Lorentz-Four-Contracted are here more dense while compactified, their core field -- per overall field -- is denser during the directly related instantons in which such corresponding superstrings are more Lorentz-Four-Contracted.  Due to this condition of a denser core field out of the overall field-networking of the specific superstring(s) that is(are) undergoing a relatively higher Lorentz-Four-Contraction than another given arbitray superstring or another given arbitrary set of superstrings, the directly related mass that here corresponds to the said superstring(s) that bear(s) a more dense core field establishment is(are) said to bear a higher mass per instanton than when such said superstrings (in general) instead bear a relatively lower Lorentz-Four-Contraction. This is if such superstrings are said to bear a tense of mass.  Superstrings are said to bear mass if these are both bosonic, bear a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology, and bear Yau-Exact singularities in terms of how I have described as such in prior sessions.  Such an expansion that is directly inverse to the degree of the directly related contraction is here said to bear a genus of a tense of Clifford Expansion.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Hold onto your hats, there is alot more to come!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: