Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Reimman Curvature Versus Ricci Curvature

As a general case, that is here to be the basic tendency in the substringular, -- the metaphorical "snapshot" of the mappable-tracing, as it is here to exist as being of a just completed path, through which a given arbitrary Hamiltonian operator has here to have been moved -- as this just mentioned phenomenology is here to exist as being a tense of a general genus of a re-delineated eigenstate, that is here to be continually re-distributed -- when this general genus of a case is here to be taken via those Ward-Cauchy conditions, -- as it is here to be of the nature of a Laplacian Transformation, -- to where this may be thought of as being of the nature of behaving as an eigenstate, of what may be thought of as being of the nature of that general tense of mapped-out homological stratum (whether one is here to be talking about cohomology that is of a symplectic nature, or whether one is here to be talking about Legendre homology that is of a Khovanov geometry), that is here to be of the general multiplicit nature of the Reimman Curvature.  Whereas -- the Laplacian-Based mappable-tracing --  that is here to have been formed by its existence here, as the resultant of the interaction of the respective given arbitrary Hamiltonian operator, (as such a said Hamiltonian Operator is here, to behave as a system of one or more eigenstates of discrete energy quanta -- that operate to perform one specific function at a microscopic level), With the holonomic substrate, that happens to exist as being of those directly corresponding correlative gravity waves, that are here to exist along the topological interplay of the Rarita Structure --  to where this may then be thought of -- as the multiplicit general state of the existence of the correlative Ricci Curvature, that is here to be of such a general given arbitrary respective case scenario.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: