Saturday, February 16, 2019

Boundedness Of Ricci Curvature

Let's initially consider a situation, in which one is to have mass-bearing superstrings that are superconformal invariant at an internal reference-frame, -- yet to where such strings are to be kinematically moved at an external reference-frame, by the activity of superstrings of discrete kinetic energy permittivity.  This just inferred overall system of energy, we will call in this given arbitrary post -- the directly associated Hamiltonian operator.  In this given case -- when the eluded-to Hamiltonian-related Ricci Curvature, that is to be the Lagrangian-Based Tracing of a gravitational-related scalar of force, as taken over a Laplacian Transform  -- that is here to be greater than lambda*gravity, (This will then mean, that the magnitude of lambda*gravity will be Less than the magnitude of the scalar amplitude of the correlative Ricci Curvature.), then, this will both mean, -- that there will tend to be the presence of a proximal local lower boundary in the correlative tracing of the said Ricci Curvature, -- as well as this working to indicate -- that the directly corresponding mass-bearing superstrings, that are here to be carried or moved by the correlative superstrings of discrete kinetic energy -- will then here in this case, act in so as to tend to degenerate more cohomology than it is here to be generating.  Furthermore -- when the eluded-to Hamiltonian-related Ricci Curvature, that is here in this case, to be the Lagrangian-Based Tracing of a gravitational-related scalar of force, as taken over a Laplacian Transform -- that is here to be less than lambda*gravity, (This will then mean, that the magnitude of lambda*gravity, will be More than the magnitude of the scalar amplitude of the correlative Ricci Curvature.), then, this will both mean, -- that there will then tend to be the presence of a proximal local upper boundary in the correlative tracing of the said Ricci Curvature, -- as well as this working to indicate -- that the directly corresponding mass-bearing superstrings, that are here to be carried or moved by the correlative superstrings of discrete kinetic energy -- will then, here in this case, act in so as to tend to generate more cohomology than it is here to be degenerating.  I will continue with  the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.

No comments: