Part Two of the Third Session of Course 14

To start out with where I left off last time, the said given arbitrary situation is isomorphic because one could pictorially bend the substringular fabric of the eluded to superstrings in so as to match the directly related superstrings as behaving identically.  The situation is isomorphic -- in terms of the directly related Planck phenomena -- because one could pictorially bend the substringular fabric of the eluded to Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates as behaving identically.  The situation is isomorphic because one could pictorially bend the substringular fabric of the directly related counterstrings in so as to extrapolate the said counterstrings as behaving identically.  the isomorphism is trivial because it is acting along a line of phenomena that may be mapped out over a unitary Lagrangian that does not change in derivative over the eluded to basis of a timeless tracing of the attributes of the relative covariant substringular phenomena that I have mentioned here.  Not all of such increments are isomorphic as to the mapping of the various superstrings, Planck phenomena, and the counterstrings, that may happen to exist within the given arbitrary substringular range that works to incorporate the general overall locus in which the Hodge-based sum of all of the said types of substringular phenomena exist -- over the metrical duration in which the said mapping of the isomorphic patterns is to be extrapolated in so as to work to determine the symmetry that would here exist among the individual substringular phenomena that I have here described in correlation to one another.  Substringular isomorphisms do happen, though, and these symmetrical determinations work to account for the repetition of certain substringular sequences -- when one works to extrapolate certain tenses of chiral-based formats of superconformal invariance, that here, involve various substringular phenomena that are codifferentiable and codeterminable from a relative distance at a metrical gauging that is simultaneous through a central conipoint.  The repetition of the just mentioned substringular sequences would here work to allow for the appropriate differential series', of which would here allow for the activity of certain discrete units of energy to be simulated in multiple general loci over an iterative set of group instantons.  Such a tense of a simulation of a kinematic propagation of energy (simulated, since the energy here is in such a tense of static equilibrium that it does not propagate here through enough of a viable Lagrangian in so as to bear any significant interaction with electromagnetic energy) that works through multiple general loci at once, may often work to allow for the needed codiffereniability in so that the proper order and commutation that may then exist here may be perturbated by the activity of the holonomic substrate of adjacent ghost inhibitors -- in order to pull the eluded to tense of superconformal invariance to move into a more viable tense of a kinematic flow or propagation of energy.  To Be Continued!  Sam Roach.