When Superstrings Are Basically Flush, Ideally

Superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are in the earlier mentioned relatively flush condition -- besides the partitions that I had discussed -- at the very beginning of BRST, right after the instanton-quaternioinic-field-impulse-mode.  Just after the said superstrings of discrete energy permittivity in space-time-fabric have completed the directly prior said mode that works to delineate these to the positioning of their next iteration of group instanton, the mentinioned superstrings very transiently organize in a relatively flush manner, when not including their discrepencies that I word of as partitions.  Immediately ensuing such an organization, the superstriings of discrete energy permttitivty that I here have eluded to undergo the Polyakov Action -- that also happens during the Bette Acton.  At this point in metrical duration, superstrings as I have discussed will then expand to the inverse degree and manner that these appear to have contracted.  Also, as the said superstrings are then undergoing a relative variance from what was directly before a relatively flush pattern of being a vibrating hoop or a vibrating strand, respectively for two and one dimensional superstrings, these superstrings then "attempt" to become orientable.  As the first-ordered point particles that work to comprise the make-up of the direclty corresponding superstrings begin to "wiggle" from the directly prior relatively flush condition, these orientate in a manner that is either smoothly kinematic in homeomorphic relation to their directly corresponding counterstrings when these are to be Noether in their next iteration during group instanton, or, heteromorphic in terms of the anharmonic multiplicit Grassman condition that these bear if the directly related superstrings are to be tachyonic in their next iteration during group instanton.  This goes for both two and one-dimensional superstrigs.  Even though the "wiggle" of one-dimensional superstrings is anharmonic in a timeless manner during the general flow of BRST, the inter-relation of the net Grassman Constant that exists between a one-dimensional superstring and its counterpart is kinetically homeomorphic if it is to be Noether in its ensuing iteration of group instanton. -- Its just that the kinetically homeomorphic Grassman Condition that exists for one-dimensional superstrings during the core part of BRST is not as smooth curved as the kinematic homeomorphic Grassman Condition that exists for two-dimensional superstrings.  What is meant by "Constant" by mentioning the Grassman Constant is what is to be a consistent shape in the direct field that binds a superstring of discrete energy permittivity with its counterpart.  If such an "attempted" consistency is not maintained over the duration of the Bette Action during BRST, and, if the directly related superstring is not made orientable during the ensuing Regge Action, then, the given arbitrary superstring will not be orientable, and thus, the said superstring will become tachyonic.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.