Part One Of The Test Solutions To The First Test Of Course 13

1)  If a swivel-shaped one-dimensional superstring is brought into a conditional tense of relative conformal invariance -- that, in the process, works to help the directly associated Bette Action eigenmetrics to have an even-functional Grassman Constant, then, the said one-dimensional superstring is more likely to remain in motion as according to Noether Flow, and, thereby, have more of a tendency to become basically straightened as a physical entity that acts as a holomomic substrate in its codifferentiable, codeterminable general locus.

2)  Generally, one-dimensional superstrings are relatively straight vibrating strands of physical phenomena -- except for the relatively few abberations that are due to these superstrings having anywhere from one to 3*10^8 partitions. This is at iteration.

3)  If a given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring differentiates kinematically within a relatively tightly-knit locus with a relatively low scalar amplitude that is directly associated with the Lagrangian of its physical trajectory over time, and, if certain other one and two-dimensional superstrings that are relatively adjacent here obey the same just mentioned Chan-Patton conditions, then, their codifferentiation will tend to be conformally invariant.

4)  Let us say that a given arbitrary set of a countable number of superstrings differentiate kinematically in a relatively tightly-knit locus over a relatively brief amount of time, the directly related mini-string segments that work to comprise the topology of the said superstrings has other segments that will here interplay at the said locus in this scenario -- in such a manner in so that a casual pervayance would not be able to detect the said eluded to replacement, due to the condition that the given need for the recycling of topological holomomic substrate that one may be able to extrapolate when in terms of the literally actual "stuff" that had been there has been redistributed in a manner that allows for the whole given cite to remain appearing as unchanged.  This is both in terms of the same format as to what was there being the same throughout the said alteration -- as well as the manner as to the behavior as to what was there also being the same throughout the said alteration.  Such an indistinguishable, yet actual change in venue, is a given arbitrary example of what is known of as indistinguishable difference.