LFCs and Cohomologies

Let us first consider here a superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that is differentiating in a Fourier-based manner -- over a sequential series of instantons.  Let us next consider the condition of such a so-stated superstring, as in the state of affairs -- to which it is moving at a constant velocity, in a terrestrial-based environment, over time.  Such a said condition -- as to any given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that is of a respective light-cone-gauge topology that is to here be of a Kaluza-Klein-based nature -- that is of a mass-bearing nature, of which is to here be moving in a terrestrial-based nature over time, at a constant velocity, is to here be in a condition by which it will then tend to work to bear a constant tense of having a consistent scalar amplitude  of its correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction.  Let us next consider the condition -- that the initially mentioned given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity, of which is here to be moving in a kinematic-based manner, in so as to work to maintain a constant state of its correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction -- is to form such a projection of its trajectory, to where the correlative cohomological-based pattern, of which it is to then form, as a physical memory as to the where, how, and when the so-stated superstring of discrete energy permittivity had differentiated in a Fourier-based manner, over time -- is to then form a mappable tracing of its ghost-based indices, that is to then tend to work to bear a relatively higher expectation value as to its probability of forming a Rham-based cohomological-based pattern, than if it were to, instead, exist in a state of a perturbative tense as to what its directly correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction, that it would otherwise tend to bear, would happen to be, if it were to vary in its velocity in its said environment of being in a terrestrial-based medium by which the said quantum of discrete energy permittivity is to be propagated or delineated through, over time.  This would then mean, that any given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- that is moving in a terrestrial-based environment at a constant velocity, as well as moving through the same general medium as to the basis of the holonomic substrate of its correlative Hamiltonian operand -- will not only tend to work to bear a consistent state of the scalar amplitude of its directly corresponding Lorentz-Four-Contraction, yet, such a so-stated Fourier-based tense of a respective given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity will as well tend to bear a higher probability of bearing both hermitian Lagrangian-based singularities and hermitian metrical-based singularities, as such a said discrete quantum of energy permittivity is to be moving over such a so-eluded-to consistent Hamiltonian-operand-based medium, over a tense of a homogeneous terrestrial-based general locus, that is to here be bearing a directoral-based angular momentum, through a discrete Lagrangian, over a discrete quantum of time.  This will then tend to mean, that such a respective superstring -- that is to be in the process of working to maintain an even tense of its directly corresponding Lorentz-Four-Contraction, will tend to bear, both less of a tendency of exhibiting Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularities and metrical-based Chern-Simons singularites -- as such a so-stated respective given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity is to here be in the process of differentiating in a Fourier-based manner, over the directly correlative metric in which such a superstring is being delineated through the duration of a directly corresponding sequential series of instantons.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.